The Law Firm of Joel R. Brandes, P.C.
  • Home
  • Recent Decisions & Articles
    • Recent Decisions, Legislation and Court Rules
    • New York Law Journal Articles by Joel R. Brandes
    • Articles Published in NYSBA Family Law Review and Journal
    • Bits and Bytes™ Issues - New York Divorce and Family Law Newsletter
    • Table of Contents of this website
    • Joel R. Brandes Letters to the Editor
    • Recent International Child Abduction Cases
    • Books by Joel R. Brandes
    • Adoption Information Articles
    • Child Abuse & Prevention Articles
    • Common Law Marriage Articles
    • Child Visitation Supervisors
    • Domestic Violence Articles
    • Engagement gifts Articles
    • Family Court Proceedings Articles
    • Grandparent and Non-Parent Visitation Articles
    • Professional Conduct Articles
    • Income Tax and Capital Gains Tax Articles
    • Spousal Support Articles
  • Divorce Information
    • Antenuptial, Prenuptial, Nuptial and Post Nuptial Agreements
    • Child Custody, Visitation (Parental Access) & Parental Alienation
    • Child Support
    • Counsel Fee Awards
    • Degrees & Licenses
    • Emergency Court Applications
    • Enforcement of Judgments & Orders
    • Equitable Distribution of Marital Property
    • Equitable Distribution Law for Trial Counsel
    • Equitable Distribution Decisions Chart to January 1, 2023
    • Exclusive Occupancy of Marital Home
    • Frequently Asked Questions About Marriage, Divorce, Separation and Custody
    • Grounds for Divorce
    • Legal Fees, Liens & Sanctions
    • Litigation & Procedure
    • Maintenance Awards until 2016
    • Maintenance Awards on or after January 22, 2016
    • Maintenance, Special Relief & Spousal Support
    • Maintenance and Child Support New York Court System Tools
    • Marital Property, Separate Property and Property Distribution
    • Motion Practice
    • Modification of Maintenance and Child Support Orders and Judgments
    • Orders of Protection
    • Qualified Domestic Relations Orders
    • Retirement Benefits
    • Right to Counsel in Matrimonial Action
    • Role of the Attorney for the Child
    • Special Relief (life, health, accident, medical and dental insurance)
    • Social Security Benefits for Divorced Spouses
    • Table of Effective dates of Revisions to Domestic Relations Law §§ 236, 237, and 240
    • Trial and Trial Testimony
    • Trial and Trial Testimony 2023 Update
    • Trial of a Divorce and Custody Action Website
    • Trial Evidence for Divorce and Family Law
    • Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction & Enforcement Act Overview
    • Valuation Aids
  • Appellate Practice
    • Important Practice Updates from the Appellate Divisions
    • Instructions for taking an Appeal to the Appellate Division
    • Taking an Appeal from Supreme Court under NYCSEF
    • Who is served with the notice of appeal?
    • Registration and Consent to Efiling by Respondents
    • Preserving the Right to Appeal
    • Appellate Division is Single Statewide Court
    • Appeals to the Appellate Division as of Right from the Supreme Court
    • Permissible Appellant—“Aggrieved party” and Mootness doctrine
    • Permissible Appellant - Appealable Judgment or Order
    • Permissible Appellant - Appeal from Order denying motion with leave to renew or without prejudice
    • Appeals : Appellate Review of Non-final Orders in Matrimonial Actions
    • Appeals : Fundamental and Harmless Error
    • Appeals : Matrimonial Presumptions and the Burden of Proof
    • Appeals : Stare Decisis, Precedent and Dicta
    • Appeals : Understanding the Support Magistrate Objection Process
    • Appeals to the Appellate Division from Family Court
    • Perfecting the Appeal to the Appellate Division - Methods
    • Perfecting the Appeal to the Appellate Division - Appellate Division Bound by Record
    • Perfecting the Appeal to the Appellate Division - Order and Settle the Transcript
    • Method of Settlement of the Transcript
    • Appeals to Appellate Division from Supreme Court by permission
    • Form of Record and Briefs - Parties, Docket Number, Method of Reproduction
    • ​Form of Briefs and Appendices - CPLR
    • What must be in the Reproduced Full Record
    • What is the Judgment-roll?
    • What must be in the Appendix.
    • What must be in Briefs
    • Time, number and manner of filing of records, appendices and briefs
    • Cross appeals - Briefing Schedule, Joint Record, Content of Briefs, Time for Service
    • Extension of time to perfect appeal
    • Concurrent appeals, Appeals from a single order or judgment. Consolidation of Appeals.
    • First Department Requirement of note of issue
    • Stay of Enforcement of Order or Judgment Pending Appeal
    • Practice in the Appellate Division: What Laws Govern
    • Practice Rules of the Appellate Divison: Joint & Local Rules
    • Practice in the Appellate Division First Department New and Amended Local Rules June 25, 2021
    • Practice in the Appellate Division, First Department, Frequently asked questions
    • Practice in the Appellate Divison: Motions in the First Department
    • Practice in the Appellate Divison: Motions in the Second Department
    • Practice in the Appellate Division: Motions in the Third Department
    • Practice In The Appellate Division:Motions in the Fourth Department
    • Instructions for Taking an Appeal Frequently Asked Questions
    • Instructions for Perfecting an Appeal to the Appellate Division
    • Instructions to Perfect an Appeal in the Third Department
    • Instructions to perfect an appeal in the Fourth Department
    • Appellate Division Fourth Department Q & A
    • Universal E-filing in the Fourth Department
    • Standards of Appellate Review in Matrimonial Actions
    • Standards of Appellate Review of Custody Determinations
    • Standards of Appellate Review of Custody Determinations - Changed Circumstances during pendency of appeal
    • Standards of Review : Fugative disentitlement doctrine in custody and child support appealsw Page
    • Mandatory Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Digital submission in Non-Efiled Matters
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department New and Amended Local Rules
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Formatting Specifications
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Frequently Asked Questions
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Second Department Technical Guidelines
    • Mandatory Electronic filing (e-filing): Second Department
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Motions Frequently Asked Questions
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Second Department - Motions -22 NYCRR 670.4 (d)
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Third Department - Digital Copies - 22 NYCRR 850.4 (a)
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Third Department Motion FAQs
    • Mandatory Electronic filing (e-filing): Fourth Department
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Fourth Department Motion FAQS
    • Electronic filing Authorization in matrimonial actions
    • E-filing Rules and Forms of the Appellate Division
    • Joel R. Brandes Reported Appeals
    • Court of Appeals Rules of Practice
    • How to take an Appeal to the Court of Appeals
    • Appeals as of Right to the Court of Appeals
    • Motions for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeals
    • Guidelines for Preparing a Motion for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeal
    • Rule 500.11 Review Alternate Procedure for Selected Appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Appealability and Reviewability in the Court of Appeals
    • What is a Final Determination appealable to Court of Appeals?
    • The "Necessarily Affects" Requirement of the Court of Appeals
    • Filing of record material and briefs in normal course appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Contents of Records, Appendices and Exhibits in Normal Course Appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Content and form of Briefs in Normal Course Appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Frequently Asked Questions for Civil and Criminal Appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Civil Motions in the Court of Appeals Frequently Asked Questions
    • Court-Pass - Court of Appeals Digital Filing Frequently Asked Questions
    • Court of Appeals Portal for uploading companion digital submissions
    • Court of Appeals Court Pass Public Access and Search
  • Trial of a Divorce and Custody Action
  • ​New York Court System Links for Lawyers
  • New York Court Rules
  • Electronic Filing in Supreme Court Rules and FAQ's
  • Removal of NYCSEF Consent 22 NYCRR 202.16-c
  • Sending Documents to the Court Using EDDS
  • Family Court Official Forms
  • New York Courts Case Search Page for E-filed Case Files
  • New York Court System Site Map
  • New York Court Websites and Decisions
  • International Child Abduction Laws and Information
  • Hague International Child Abduction Convention cases from 2011 to date.
  • Table of Reported and Unreported Hague Convention Cases from 1988 until 2010
  • Who we are
  • Joel R. Brandes Curriculum vitae
  • Make an Appointment for a Consultation
  • Subscribe to Bits and Bytes™
  • Terms of Use Privacy Policy
  • Consultation Fee Payment
  • Untitled
  • New Page

​

Table of Hague Convention Cases from 1988 to May 20, 2015
​This  page contains a table of cases since 1988, and are organized by (1) Subject Matter; (2) Alphabetically; and (3) Unreported Cases. The links to the decisions have been discontinued. 

The page, titled Federal Hague Convention Child Abduction Cases to date contains Hague Convention cases from 2011 to date.

Attorneys Fees, Necessary Costs and Travel Expenses

Aguilera v. De Lara, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2014 WL 4204947 (D.Ariz.) [Mexico] [Necessary Expenses]
Aldinger v Segler,  157 Fed. Appx. 317 (1st Cir.,2005) [Attorneys Fees & Costs]
Aly v. Aden, 2013 WL 593420 (D. Mn) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Attorneys Fees & Costs Clearly Inappropriate] [Petition Granted]
Antunez-Fernandes v. Connors-Fernandes, 259 F.Supp.2d 800 (N. D. Iowa 2003) [France]
Avendano v Smith, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 3702401 (D.N.M.)  [Mexico] [Rights of Custody] [Patria potestas] [Grave Risk of Harm ] [Attorneys fees]
Berendsen v Nichols, 938 F.Supp. 737 (D. Kan., 1996)
Cuellar v Joyce, 603 F.3d 1142, 10 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5642 (9th Cir 2010) [Panama]
Dawson v McPherson, 2014 WL 4748512 (M.D.N.C.) [United Kingdom] [Necessary Costs]
Distler v Distler, 26 F.Supp.2d 723 (D. New Jersey, 1998) [Israel]
E.D.T. ex rel. Adamah v. Tayson, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 4116666 (E.D.N.Y.) [United Kingdom] [Attorneys fees and Costs]
Flynn v Boarders, 2007 WL 862548 (M. D. Kentucky) [Ireland]
Frier v. Frier, 985 F.Supp.2d 710 (E. D. Mich. 1997)  [Israel]
Gee v. Hendroffe, 2015 WL 2151885 (S.D.Tex.) [South Africa] [Costs and Expenses]
Hamprecht v Hamprecht, 2013 WL 1155675 (M.D.Fla.) [Germany] [ Attorney's Fees and Costs]
Hirst v. Tiberghien, 2013 WL 6827813 (D.S.C.) [United Kingdom] [Attorney's Fees]
Hirst v Tiberhagien, 2014 WL 3687425 (D.S.C.) [United Kingdom] [Necessary Expenses] [ Motion to Reconsider Denied]
In re One Infant Child, 2014 WL 704037 (S.D.N.Y.) [Singapore] [Attorney Fees and necessary expenses]
Lakeman v Weed, 2011 WL 824588 (D.Minn.) [Canada]
Larrategui v Laborde, 2014 WL 2154477 (E.D.Cal.) [Argentina] [Fees and Costs] [Not clearly inappropriate]
Lyon v. Moreland-Lyon, 2012 WL 5384558 (D.Kan.) [England] [Attorneys Fees]
Matter of S.E.O. and Y.O., 2013 WL 4564746 (S.D.N.Y.)) [Turkey] [Costs and Expenses] [Clearly Inappropriate]
Mendoza v Silva, 2014 WL 658068 (N.D.Iowa) [Mexico] [ Attorneys Fees] [Clearly inappropriate]
Montero-Garcia v. Montero, 2013 WL 6048992 (W.D.N.C.) [Dominican Republic] [Attorneys Fees]
Norinder v Fuentes, --- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 3966153 (7th Cir.(Ill.))[Sweden]
Paulus ex rel. P.F.V. v. Cordero, 2013 WL 432769 (M.D.Pa.) [Dominican Republic] [Attorney Fees and Costs] [Pro Bono Counsel]
Pliego v. Hayes, 2015 WL 1893426 (W.D.Ky.) [Turkey] [Costs and Expenses]
Ponce v Sanchez, 2011 WL 6820332 (D.Colo.) [Mexico] [Attorney Fees]
Rydder v Rydder, 49 F.3d 369 (8th Cir.,1995) [Poland]
Salinier v. Moore, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 3515699 (D.Colo.) [France] [Attorneys Fees and Costs]
Salvidar v Rodella, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 4497507 (W.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Attorneys Fees]
Salazar v Maimon, 2014 WL 1688197 (5th Cir., 2014) [Venezuela] [Attorneys Fees and Necessary Expenses]
Slagenweit v. Slagenweit, 63 F.3d 719 (8th Cir. 1995) [Germany]
Taylor v Hunt, 2013 WL 620934 (E.D.Tex.) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Guardian Ad Litem] [Guardian Fees] [Petition Granted]
Whallon v. Lynn, 356 F.3d 138 (1st Cir.,2004) [Poland]
White v White, 893 F.Supp.2d 755 (E.D. Va, 2013) [Switzerland] [Attorneys Fees and Costs]


Availability of Hague Convention as a Remedy

Matter of Mohsen, 715 F. Supp. 1063 (D. Wyo. 1989) [Bahrain]
Mezo v. Elmergawi, 855 F. Supp. 59 (E. D. N. Y. 1994 [Egypt/Libya]

Suarez v Castrillo, 2011 WL 2669198 (D.Colo.) [Venezuela] 
Taveras v. Taveras,  397 F. Supp. 908, (S.D. Ohio, 2005)  [Dominican Republic]

Tavaras v Tavaras, 477 F.3d 767 (Sixth Cir., 2006) [Dominican Republic]
Viteri v Pflucker, 550 F.Supp.2d 829 (ND Illinois 2008) [Peru]
Wiezel v. Wiezel-Tyranauer, 385 F.Supp.2d 240 (S. D. N. Y., 2005) (S. D. N. Y.) [Israel]


Defenses

Acosta v Acosta, 2012 WL 2178982 (D.Minn.) [Peru] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Acosta v Acosta,--- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 3970239 (C.A.8 (Minn.)) [Peru] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Expert opinion]
Aguilera v. De Lara, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2014 WL 3427548 (D.Ariz.)[Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition granted]
Anderson v. Acree, 250 F.Supp.2d 876 (S.D. Ohio 2002) [New Zealand] [Wishes of Child]
Antunez-Fernandes v. Connors-Fernandes, 259 F.Supp.2d 800 (N. D. Iowa 2003) [France] [Consent and Acquiescence]

Aranda v Serna, 2013 WL 665064 (M.D.Tenn.) [Mexico] [Well Settled ][Age and Maturity] [Petition Denied]
Baran v Beaty, 479 F.Supp.2d 1257 (S.D. Alabama, 2007) [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Baran v Beaty, 526 F.3d 1340 (11th Cir. (Ala.)) [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Baxter v. Baxter, 324 F.Supp.2d 536 (D. Delaware, 2004) [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Baxter v. Baxter, 423 F.3d  363  (3rd Cir., 2005)  [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Belay v Getachew, 272 F.Supp.2d 553,(D. Md. 2003)  [Sweden] [Well-Settled in New Environment]
Buenaver v Vasquez, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2014 WL 3058250 (E.D.N.Y.) [Colombia] [Now Settled] [Petition Granted]
Blondin v. Dubois, 19 F. Supp. 2d 123 (S. D. N. Y. 1998), judgment vacated, 189 F.3d 240 (2d Cir. 1999) 78 F. Supp. 2d 283, 288-93 (S. D. N. Y. 2000) ("Blondin III"), 238 F.3d 153 (2nd Cir. (N.Y.) 2001) ("Blondin IV")  [France] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Wishes of the Child]
Bobadilla v Cordero, 2014 WL 3869998 (M.D.N.C.) Mexico] [Now Settled] [Discretion to Order Return] [Petition granted]
Bocquet v Ouzid, 225 F.Supp.2d 1337 (2003)  [France] [Well-Settled in New Environment]
Bowen v. Bowen, 2014 WL 2154905 (W.D.Pa.) [Northern Ireland] [Habitual Residence] [Consent] [Wishes of Child] [Petition denied]
Broca v. Giron, 2012 WL 7660123 (E.D.N.Y.)  [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Age and Maturity]
Broca v Giron,--- Fed.Appx. ----, 2013 WL 3745985 (C.A.2 (N.Y.)) [Mexico] [Well-Settled]
Carrascosa v Mcguire, 520 F.3d 249 (3d Cir. 2008) [Spain] [Fundamental Freedom]
Caro v Sanchez, 2013 WL 5300671 (D.N.J.) [Spain] [Consent] [Petition Denied]
Cascio v Pace, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2014 WL 197724 (N.D.Ill.) [Italy] [Rights of Custody] [Public Service Org] [Consent] [well settled] [Petition denied]
Castillo v Castillo, 597 F.Supp.2d 432 (D. Delaware, 2009) [Colombia] [Well-Settled in New Environment] [Wishes of Child]
Castro v  Martinez, 2012 WL 359901 (W.D.Tex.)) [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 20]
Charalambous v Charalambous, --- F.3d ----, 2010 WL 4963063 (1st Cir.(Me.)) [Cyprus] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Choi v. Kim, 404 F. Supp. 495 (S. D. N. Y., 2005) [Canada] [Consent and Acquiescence]

Cuellar v Joyce, 596 F.3d 505  (9th Cir. (Mont.)) [Panama] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Consent]
Currier v. Currier, 845 F. Supp. 916 (D.N.H.1994) [Germany] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Dalsgaard v Montoya, 2011 WL 5037223 (M.D.Fla.) [Denmark] [Habitual Residence] [Wishes of the child defense]
Danipour v. McLarey, 286 F.3d 1 (1st Cir., 2002) [Sweden] [Grave Risk of Harm]

DeSilva v Pitts, 481 F.3d 1279 (10th Cir.2007)   [Canada] [Wishes of child]
Di Guiseppe v DiGuiseppe, 2008 WL 1743079 (E.D. Michigan)[Canada] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Age and Maturity]
De Vasconcelos v De Paula Batista, 2011 WL 806096 (E.D.Tex.) [Brazil] [Rights of Custody] [well settled] [age and maturity]
Didur v Viger, 392 F.Supp.2d 1268 (D. Kansas, 2005) [Canada] [Grave Risk of Harm] 
Didur v Viger, (10th Cir. 2006) No. 05-3440 D.C. No. 05-CV-2188-JWL)  [Canada] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Duarte v Bardales, 526 F.3d 563 (9th Cir. 2008) [Ecuador] [Equitable Tolling]
Edoho v Edoho, 2010 WL 3257480, (S.D. Texas, 2010) [Bahamas] [Well-Settled in New Environment]
Elyashiv v. Elyashiv, 353 F.Supp.2d 394 (E.D.N.Y., 2005) [Isreal] [Grave Risk of Harm]
England v. England, 234 F.3d 268 (5th Cir. 2000)   [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Ermini v Vittori, 2013 WL 1703590 (S.D.N.Y.) [Italy] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Ermani v Vittori, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 3056360 (C.A.2) [Italy] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Denied]
Estrada v. Salas-Perez, 2012 WL 4503147 (N.D.Ill.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm
Etienne v. Zuniga, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 4918791 (W.D.Wash.) [Mexico][Well-Settled in New Environment]
Falk v Sinclair, 692 F.Supp.2d 147 (D. Maine., 2010) [Germany] [One year Statute of Limitations] [Wishes of the Child]
Fernandez-Trejo v. Alvarez-Hernandez, 2012 WL 6106418 (M.D.Fla.) [Mexico] [Rights of Custody] [Equitable Tolling] [Well-Settled]
Flynn v. Borders, 472 F.Supp.2d 906 ( E.D. Ky. 2007) [Ireland] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Font Paulus ex rel. P.F.V. v. Vittini Cordero, 2012 WL 2524772 (M.D.Pa.) [Dominican Republic] [Well Settled in New Environment] [Wishes of the Child]
Foster v Foster, 654 F. Supp 2d 348 (W. D. Pennsylvania, 2009)[Canada] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Friedrich v. Friedrich, 78 F.3d 1060 (6th Cir. 1996) [Germany] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Freier v. Freier, 969 F. Supp. 436, 443 (E.D.Mich.1996) [Israel] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Furnes v Reeves, 362 F.3d 702 (11th Cir., 2004) [Norway] [One year limitations]
Application of Garcia v Varona--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 3805778 (N.D.Ga.) [Spain] [Rights of custody] [Patria potestas ] [Consent] [Abandonment]
Application of Gavia v Hernandez, 2013 WL 6115725 (D. Utah) [Mexico] [Guardian ad litem] [Well-Settled] [Age and Maturity] [Petition Denied]
Gwiazdowski v. Gwiazdowska, 2015 WL 1514436 (E.D.N.Y.) [Poland] [Well settled defense]
Gallagher v. Gallagher, --- F.Supp.3d ----, 2014 WL 7251039 (D.Mass.) [Ireland] [Consent] [Petition granted]
Gonzalez-Caballero v. Mena, 251 F.3d 789 (9th Cir., Ariz., 2001) [Panama] [Consent]
Giles v Bravo, 2012 WL 704745 (D. Nev.) [Mexico] [Well Settled in New Environment] [Acquiescence]
Habrzyk v Habrzyk, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 1331674 (N.D.Ill.) [Poland] [Well-Settled] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Haimdas v Haimdas, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2010 WL 2342377 (E.D.N.Y.)  [England] [Rights of Custody] [Wishes of The Child]
Hazbun Escaf v. Rodriquez, 200 F.Supp.2d 603 (E. D. Va. 2002)  [Colombia] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Hirst v. Tiberghien, 2013 WL 1867343 (D.S.C.) United Kingdom] [Age & Maturity] [Guardian] [Visitation] [Petition Granted]
Hofmann v Sender,--- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 1955846 (C.A.2) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Consent or Acquiesence]
In re B. Del C.S.B., 525 F. Supp.2d 1182 (C.D. California, 2008) [Mexico] [Well Settled in New Environment]  
In re D.T.J., 2013 WL 3866636 (S.D.N.Y.) [Hungary] [Well Settled] [Age & Maturity] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Denied]
In re Koc, 181 F.Supp.2d 136 (E.D.  N.Y. 2001) [Poland] [Well Settled in New Environment]
In re Robinson, 983 F. Supp. 1339 (D. Colo. 1997)  [United Kingdom] [Well Settled in New Environment]

Karpenko v Leendertz, --- F.3d ----, 2010 WL 3326131 (3rd Cir. (Pa.) 2010) [Netherlands] [Unclean hands]
Kufner v Kufner, 440 F.Supp.2d 491 (D.R.I., 2007) [Germany] [Grave Risk of Harm  [Wishes of Child]
Kufner v Kufner, 519 F.3d 533 (1st Cir. 2008) [Germany] [Grave Risk of Harm  [Wishes of Child]

Matter of Lieberman v Tabachnik, 625 F.Supp.2d 1109 (D. Colorado 2009) [Mexico] [Rights of Custody][Wishes of the Child]
Muhlemkamp v Blizzard, 521 F Supp 2d 1140 (E.D. Washington) [Germany] [Well Settled in New Environment] [Full Faith and Credit] [Temporary Custody]
Laguna v Avila, 2008 WL 1986253 (E. D. N. Y.) [Colombia] [Video Link Testimony] [Wishes of Child]
Larbie v Larbie, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 3089773 (C.A.5 (Tex.) [United Kingdom] [Moot Appeal ][Consent and Acquiescence] [Habitual Residence]
Larrategui v. Laborde, 2014 WL 128048 (E.D.Cal.)[Argentina] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Denied]
In re Application of Lozano, 2011 WL 3667444 (S.D.N.Y.) [United Kingdom] [Well-Settled in New Environment]
Lozano v. Alvarez, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 4479007 (C.A.2 (N.Y.)) [United Kingdom] [Well-Settled Defense] [Equitable Tolling]
Ly v. Heu, 296 F.Supp.2d 1009 (D. Minn. 2003) [France] [Well Settled in New Environment]
Lyon v Lyon, 2012 WL 1970363 (D.Kan.) [England] [Consent and Acquiescence]
Locicero v. Lurashi, 321 F. Supp. 2d 295 (D. Puerto Rico, 2004)  [Argentina] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Lockhart v Smith, 2011 WL 4402361 (D.Me.) [Canada] [Wishes of the Child]
Lopez v. Alcala, 547 F.Supp.2d 1255 (M. D. Fla. 2008) [Mexico] [Well-Settled] [Immigration Status]
Lopez v Villareal, 2012 WL 458490 (D.Nev.)) [Mexico] [Consent or Acquiescence]
Lynch v Mendez Lynch, 220 F. Supp.2d 1347, ( M.D. Florida, 2002)  [Argentina] [Well Settled in New Environment] 
March v Levine, 136 F. Supp.2d 831, (M.D. Tennessee,2000)  [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Margain v Ruiz-Bours, Not for publication, 2015 WL 500685 (9th Cir., 2015) [Mexico] [Now Settled Defense]
Matas-Vidal v. Libbey-Aguilera, 2013 WL 3995300 (D.Utah) [Mexico] [TRO Granted] [Well-Settled] [Age and Maturity] [Petition Denied]
Matter of Mahmoud, 1997 WL 43524 (E. D. N. Y.) [England] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies]
Matovski v Matovski, 2007 WL 2600862 (S. D. N. Y., 2007) [Australia] [Well Settled In New Environment] [Wishes of the Child]
Mauvis v Herisse, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 5659412 (C.A.1 (Mass.)[Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Granted]
Miller v. Miller, 240 F.3d 392 (4th Cir. 2001)  [Canada]
Mlynarski v. Pawezka, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 1150310 (D. Mass, 2013) [Poland] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Granted]
Moura v Cunha, --- F.Supp.3d ----, 2014 WL 7251039 (D.Mass.) [Brazil] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition granted]
Mozes v. Mozes, 239 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2001) [Israel] [Well Settled in New Environment]
Munoz v. Rivera, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 563419 (W.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Granted]
Ngassa v Mpafe, 488 F.Supp.2d 514 (D. Maryland, 2007)  [Italy] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Neves v Neves, 637 F. Supp 2d 322 (W.D. North Carolina, 2009) [Germany] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Attorneys Fees]
Nixon v Nixon, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 7972481 (D.N.M.) [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Nunez-Escudero v. Tice-Menley, 58 F.3d 374 (8th Cir.1995)  [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Oddy v Morris, 2012 WL 464227 (D.Hawaii) [United Kingdom] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Ortiz v. Martinez, 2014 WL 1409446 (N.D.Ill.)  [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition denied]
Ozaltin v Ozaltin, 2012 WL 2026443 (S.D.N.Y.) [Turkey] [Well-Settled] [Rights of access]
Pesin v Osorio Rodriguez, 77 F.Supp.2d 1277 ( S.D. Florida, 1999) [Venezuela]  [consent and Acquiescence] 
Pesin v. Rodriguez, 244 F.3d 1250 (11th Cir. 2001) [Venezuela]  [Acquiescence] [Fugitive Disentitlement]
People ex rel. Ron v. Levi, 719 N.Y.S.2d 365 (App. Div. 2001) [Israel] 
Philippopoulos, v. Philippopoulou, 461 F.Supp.2d 1321 ( N.D. Georgia, 2006) [Greece] [Well Settled in New Environment]

Pignoloni v Gallagher, 2014 WL 642596 (2d Cir 2014) [Italy] [Consent] [Petition denied]
Pignoloni v Gallagher, Slip Copy, 2012 WL 5904440 (E.D.N.Y.) [Italy] [Consent]
Raijmakers-Eghaghe v. Haro, 131 F.Supp.2d 953 (E. D. Mich. 2001) [Netherlands] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Ramirez v Buyauskas, 2012 WL 606746 (E.D.Pa.) [Mexico] ["Patria potestas'] [Well-settled in New Environment] [Wishes of the Child]
Rial v Rijo, 2010 WL 1643995 (S. D. N. Y.) [Spain] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Rodriguez v. Sieler, 2012 WL 5430369 (D.Mont.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 20]
Rivera Rivas v. Segovia, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 5394778 (W.D.Ark.) [El Salvador] [Well-Settled in New Environment]
Roche v Hartz, 2011 WL 841556 (N.D.Ohio) [Australia] [One Year Statute of Limitations]
Rovirosa v. Paetau, 2012 WL 6087481 (S.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Patria Postestas]
Rowe v Vargason, 2011 WL 4529341 (D. Minn.) [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Well Settled in New Environment] [Conditional order]
Rydder v Rydder, 49 F.3d 369 (8th Cir.,1995) [Poland]  [Grave Risk of Harm]
Sanchez v Sanchez, 2012 WL 3204183 (W.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Well-Settled] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] 
Silverman v Silverman, 338 F.3d 886 (8th Cir, 2003) [Israel] [ Grave Risk of Harm]

Simcox v Simcox, 511 F.3d 594 (C.A.6 (Ohio)) [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Undertakings]
Slight v. Noonkester, 2014 WL 282642 (D.Mont.) [Ireland] [Wrongful Retention] [Chasing order] [Well-Settled] [Petition Denied]
Souratgar v Fair, 2012 WL 6700214 (S.D. N.Y., 2012) [Singapore] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Souratgar v. Fair, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 2631375 (C.A.2 (N.Y.))[Singapore] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Fundamental Freedoms]
Stirzaker v. Beltran, 2010 WL 1418388 (D.Idaho) [Mexico] [Rights of Custody] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 20]
Tavares v Morales, 2014 WL 2038318 (S.D.N.Y.) [Spain] [Now Settled] [Petition Denied]
Taveras ex rel. L.A.H. v. Morales, --- Fed.Appx. ----, 2015 WL 2263023 (C.A.2 (N.Y.)) (summary order) [Spain] [Now Settled]
Trundig v Trundig, 686 F.Supp.2d 570 ( M.D. North Carolina, 2010) [Germany] [Wishes of the Child]
Tsarbopoulos v Tsarbopoulos, 176 F.Supp.2d 1045 (E. D. Washington, 2001)  [Greece] [Grave Risk of Harm]
State ex rel Geiser v Valentine, 11/16/2007 NYLJ 30, (col. 3) (Sup. Ct, Richmond Co., Minardo, J.) [Switzerland] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Steffen F. v. Severina P., 966 F.Supp.2d 922 (E. Ariz. 1997) [Germany] [Grave Risk of Harm]

Taylor v Taylor, 2012 WL 6631395 (C.A.11 (Fla.)) [United Kingdom] [Grave Risk of Harm] 
Trundig v Trundig, 686 F.Supp.2d 570 ( M.D. North Carolina, 2010) [Germany] [Wishes of the Child]
Uzoh v Uzoh, 2012 WL 1565345 (N.D.Ill.)) [England] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Unclean hands]
Van De Sande v. Van De Sande, 431 F.3d 567 (7th Cir., 2005) [Belgium] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Van Driessche v. Ohio-Esezeoboh,466 F.Supp.2d 828 (S.D. Tex.,2006) [Belgium] [Well Settled in New Environment]
Vasconcelos v. Batista, 2013 WL 600200 (C.A.5 (Tex.)) [Brazil] [Age and Maturity]
Vasquez v Colores,--- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 3366380 (8th Cir.(Minn.)) [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Evidence]
Velasquez v Green, 2012 WL 2885662 (E.D.Tex.)) [Canada] [Well-Settled in New Environment] [Age and Maturity]
Velasquez v. Funes de Velasquez, 2015 WL 1565142 [E.D. Virginia ] [El Salvador] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Vasquez v Vasquez, 2013 WL 7045041 (N.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Consent] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Denied]
Vujicevic v. Vujicevic, 2013 WL 2627132 (W.D.Wash.) [Croatia] [Age & Maturity] [Petition Denied]
Walker v. Kitt, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 5237262 (N.D.Ill.) [Israel] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 20]
Walker v Walker, 2012 WL 5668330 (C.A.7 (Ill.) [Australia] [Habitual Residence] [Consent]
Walker v Walker, 2011 WL 5008533 (N.D.Ill.) [Australia] [Habitual Residence] [Abandonment and Consent]
In re Walsh, 31 F.Supp.2d 200 (D. Mass. 1998) [Ireland] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Walsh v. Walsh, 221 F.3d 204 (1st Cir. 2000)  [Ireland] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Germany]
Wanninger v. Wanninger, 850 F. Supp. 78 (D. Mass, 1994) [Germany]  [Consent and Acquiescence]
Whallon v. Lynn, 230, F.3d 450 (1st Cir. (Mass.) 2000)[Germany] [Consent and Acquiescence]
Wojcik v. Wojcik, 959 F.Supp.2d 413 (ED. Mich. 1997) [France] [Well Settled in New Environment]
Yaman v. Yaman, 2013 WL 322204 (D.N.H.) [Turkey] [Well-Settled] [Equitable Tolling]
Yaman v. Yaman, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 4827587 (C.A.1 (N.H.)) [Turkey] [Now Settled] [Equitable Tolling] [Article 18] [Guardian Ad Litem] [Petition Denied]
Yang v Tsui, 416 F.3d 199 (3d Cir.,2005) [Canada] [Wishes of Child]

Yang v Tsui, 499 F.3d 259 (3d Cir., 2007) [Canada] [Wishes of Child]
 

Effect of Notice on the Merits of the Custody Dispute 

Miller v Miller, 240 F.3d 392, (4th Cir.,2001)  [Canada]

Federal and State Judicial Remedies, Younger Abstention, Colorado River Doctrine and Appeals

Alcala v Hernandez, 2014 WL 5506739 (D.S.C.) [Mexico] [Provisional Remedies] [Temporary Restraining Order] [Judicial Notice]
Alcala v. Hernandez, 2015 WL 1893291 (D.S.C.) [Mexico] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Testimony by Video]
Application of Stead v Menduno, Not Reported in F.Supp.3d, 2014 WL 6819547 (D.Colo.)  [ New Zealand] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Expert Testimony]
Arulpragasam v. Bronfman, 2013 WL 2249256 (E.D.N.Y.) [England] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Use of Pseudonyms in Civil Litigation]
Asvesta v Petroutsas, 580 F.3d 1000 (9th Cir 2009) [Greece] [Comity]
Barzilay v Barzilay, 536 F.3d 844 (8th Cir. 2008) [Israel] [Rule Against Abstention]
Bekier v. Bekier, 248 F.3d 1051 (11th Cir. 2001) [Israel] [Appeal moot after child returned]

Biel v. Bekmukhamedova, --- F.Supp.2d ---- 2013 WL 4574161 (E.D. Louisiana.) [Luxembourg] [Younger and Colorado River Abstention]
Broda v Abarca, 2011 WL 900983 (D.Colo.) [Mexico] [Comity]
Boehm v Boehm, 2011 WL 863066 (M.D.Fla.) [Austria] [Comity]
Bromley v Bromley, 30 F.Supp.2d 857 (E. D. Pennsylvania, 1988)  [United Kingdom] [No authority to enforce rights of access]

Carnelli v Pas, 2011 WL 1983360 (D.N.J.) [United KIngdom] [Return of Child to Different Country than Habitual Residence] [Wishes of the child]
Cerit v. Cerit, 188 F.Supp.2d 1239 (D.Haw.2002) [Turkey] [Younger abstention and Colorado River abstention]
Charalambous v Charalambous, 744 F.Supp.2d 375 (D. Maine 2010) [Cyprus] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Stay]
Charalambous v Charalambous, 744 F.Supp.2d 379 (D. Maine 2010) [Cyprus] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Stay] [Temporary Custody]
Chafin v Chafin, --- S.Ct. ----, 2013 WL 598436 (U.S.) [Scotland][ Federal & State Judicial Remedies - Appeals - Mootness]
Copeland v Copeland, 134 F3d 362 (4th Cir., 1998) [France] [Colorado River Abstention]
Culculoglu v Culculoglu, 2013 WL 4045905 (D.Nev.)) [Canada] [Consent or Acquiescence] [Petition Denied]
Culculoglu v Culculoglu, 2013 WL 1413231 (D.Nev.) [Canada] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Temporary Restraining Order Granted] [Delivery of Passport to Court]
Diabo v Delisle, 500 F.Supp.2d 159 (N.D. New York, 2007) [Canada] [Enforcement of Own Judgment]
Demaj v Sakaj, 2012 WL 476168 (D.Conn.) [Italy] [Discovery]
Demaj v. Sakaj, 2012 WL 3822015 (D.Conn.) [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Evidence of Parental Alienation]
Ebanks v Ebanks, 2007 WL 2591196 (S.D.N.Y.) [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Service of process]
Escaf v. Rodriquez, 191 F. Supp. 2d 685 (E. D. Va. 2002) [Colombia] [ Younger Abstention and Colorado River Abstention not required]
Fawcett v McRoberts, 326 F.3d 491 (4th Cir.,2003) [Scotland] [Appeal not moot after child returned]
Filipczak v Filipczak, 2013 WL 692694 (2d Cir 2013)  [Poland] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Well Settled]
Fridlund v Spychaj-Fridlund, 654 FSupp 2d 634, ( E.D. Kentucky, 2009) [Sweden] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] 
Gaudin v. Remis, 379 F.3d 631 (9th Cir. (Hawaii) Mar 11, 2002) [Canada] [Appeal moot when petitioner moves to US]

Gee v Hendroffe, 2014 WL 60325 (D.Nev.) [South Africa] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [42 U.S.C. § 11603(b)]["Located"]
Gee v Hendroffe, 2013 WL 5375294 (D.Nev.)  [South Africa] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Jurisdiction] [Venue]
Gonzalez-Caballero v. Mena, 251 F.3d 789 (9th Cir. (Ariz.) 2001) [Panama] [Scope of Review]

Grieve v. Tamerin, 269 F.3d 149 (2d Cir. 2001) [Israel] [Younger Abstention]
Hamprecht v Hamprecht, 2012 WL 1367534 (M.D.Fla.) [Germany] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies]
Haylock v. Ebanks, 2013 WL 5410463 (E.D.La.) [Honduras] Necessary Costs and Expenses] 
Holder v. Holder, 305 F.3d 854 (9th Cir., 2002) [Germany] [Colorado River abstention not required]

Hynes v. Berger, 2012 WL 4889854 (D.Md.) [Germany] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Denial of Notice and Opportunity to be Heard]
In re A.A.S., 2014 WL 840010 (S.D.N.Y.)[Dominican Republic] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Anti-injunction Act]
Journe v. Journe, 911 F. Supp. 43 (Puerto Rico, 1995) [France] [Waiver of rights]
Jakubik v Schmirer, 2013 WL 3465857 (S.D.N.Y.) [Hungary] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Intervention By Child Subject of Proceeding]
Khan v. Fatima, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 1560398 (C.A.7 (Ill.)) [Canada] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies -Rule 52 - Duty to Make Findings of Fact]
Khalip v Khalip, 2011 WL 1882514 (E.D.Mich.) [Ukraine] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Stay]
Karpenko v Leendertz, --- F.3d ----, 2010 WL 3326131 (3rd Cir. (Pa.) 2010) [Netherlands] [Unclean Hands]
Larbie v Larbie, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 3089773 (C.A.5 (Tex.) [United Kingdom] [Moot Appeal ][Consent and Acquiescence] [Habitual Residence]
Lawrence v. Lewis, Slip Copy, 2015 WL 1299285 (S.D.Ohio) [United Kingdom] [Temporary Restraining Order]
Leser v Berridge,--- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 6811035 (C.A.10 (Colo.)) [Czech Republic] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Moot]
Londano v Gonzalez, 2013 WL 1934043, (D. Massachusetts) [Colombia] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Temporary Restraining Order]
Lops v. Lops, 140 F.3d 927 (11th Cir. 1998) [Germany] [Abstention not required]
Marquez v Castillo, 2014 WL 5782812 (M.D.Fla.) [Mexico] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Temporary Restraining Order]
Matter of Leslie v. Noble, 377 F.Supp.2d 1232 (S.D. Florida, 2005) [Belize] [Fugitive disentitlement]
Matter of Mahmoud, 1997 WL 43524 (E.D.N.Y., 1997) [England] [Removal From State Court to Federal Court]
Mauvais v. Herisse, 2013 WL 6383930 (D.Mass.) [Canada] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Temporary Restraining Order]
Morgan v. Morgan, 289 F.Supp.2d 1067 (N.D. Iowa 2003) [England] [Temporary restraining order]
Morton v Morton, 982 F. Supp. 675 (D. Nebraska, 1997) [Germany] [Full faith and credit" and "res judicata]
Muhlemkamp v Blizzard, 521 F Supp 2d 1140 (E.D. Washington) [Germany] [Well Settled in New Environment] [Full Faith and Credit] [Temporary Custody]
Murphy v. Sloan, 2013 WL 4725120 (N.D. California) [Ireland] [Temporary Restraining Order] [No Security Required] [Deposit Passports]
Navani v Shahani, 496 F.3d 1121 (10th Cir., 2007) [England] [Appeal Moot After New English Custody Order]
Norinder v Fuentes, --- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 3966153 (7th Cir.(Ill.))[Sweden] [Discovery]
Ohlander v. Larson, 114 F.3d 1531 (10th Cir.1997) [Sweden] [Error to deny motion to dismiss own petition]
Ordon Ez v. Tacuri,  2009 WL 2928903 (E. D. N. Y. 2009) [Ecuador] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Video link Testimony]
Ostos v Vega, 2015 WL 569124 (N.D. Texas, Dallas Division) [Mexico] [Motion to dismiss] [Maintain Statues Quo] [Guardian Ad Litem] [Expedited Discovery]
Patrick v. Rivera-Lopez, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 388053 (C.A.1 (Puerto Rico)) [Puerto Rico] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies - Bond] [Rights of Custody]
Pliego v Hayes, 2014 WL 6674560 (W.D.Ky.)[Turkey] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Expert Testimony][Privilege]
Prevot v Prevot , 59 F.3d 556 (6th Cir, 1995) [France] [Fugitive disentitlement]
Rana v Multani, Slip Copy, 2015 WL 2330163 (S.D.N.Y.) [Canada] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies]
Reyes v Jeffcoat, 2012 WL 4009641 (D.S.C.) [Venezuela] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Evidence]
Rigby v Damant, 486 F.Supp.2d 222 (D. Mass. 2009) [Canada] [Anti-Injunction Act]
Rigby v Damant, 486 F.3d 692 (1st Cir. 2007) [Canada] [No Appeal from Denial of Injunction]
Romero-Mejia v. Ivers, 2013 WL 1412237 (E.D.Wash.) [Mexico] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies ][Temporary Restraining Order]
Rowe v Vargason, 2011 WL 4529341 (D. Minn.) [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Well Settled in New Environment] [Conditional order]
Rowe v Vargason, 2011 WL 6151523 (D.Minn.) [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Australia]
R.S. v. D.O., 2012 WL 874833 (N.Y.Sup.) [Italy] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies]
Sanchez v. R.G.L.,--- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 684606 (C.A.5 (Tex.)) [Mexico] [Proper Respondent] [Child’s Right to Appeal] [Guardian ad litem] [Effect of asylum pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1158. ]
Sanchez v Sanchez, 2012 WL 3204183 (W.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Well-Settled] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies]
Silverman v. Silverman, 267 F.3d 788 (8th Cir. 2001) [Israel] [Younger Abstention not required]
Singh v Pierpont, 2014 WL 6471374 (D. Hawaii) [Canada] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Res Judicata]
Skolnick v Wainer, 2013 WL 6732656 (D.Conn.) [Singapore] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Motion to Dismiss] [Consent or acquiescence]
Skolnick v. Wainer, 2013 WL 5329112 (E.D.N.Y.)) [Singapore] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Jurisdiction][Venue]
Smedley v Smedley, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 5647426 (C.A.4 (N.C.) [Germany] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Comity] [Petition Granted]
Teijeiro Fernandez v. Yeager, 121 F.Supp.2d 1118 (W. D.  Mich. 2000)  [Spain] [No authority to enforce rights of access]

Tlustochowicz v. Tlustochowicz, 2012 WL 3779071 (N.D.Ill.) [Poland] [Article 15] [Habitual Residence]
Tucker v Ellenby, 2011 WL 5361154 (S.D.Fla.) [Belize] [Yunger and Colorado River Abstention]
Von Kennel Gaudin v. Remis, 282 F.3d 1178 (9th Cir. 2002) [Canada] [Appeal moot when petitioner moves to US]
Velasquez v Velasquez, 2014 WL 7272934 (E.D.Va.) [El Salvador] [Provisional Remedies] [Temporary Restraining order]
Vujicevic v Vujicevic, 2012 WL 4948640 (S.D.N.Y.) [Croatia] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Notice & Opportunity to Be Heard]
Vujicevic v Vujicevic, 2012 WL 5896766 (S.D.N.Y.) [Croatia] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] Service of Process]
In re Walsh, 53 F.Supp.2d 91 (D. Mass. 1999) [Ireland]  [Fugitive disentitlement]

Walsh v. Walsh, 221 F.3d 204 (1st Cir. 2000) [Ireland]  [Fugitive disentitlement]
White v. White, 556 Fed. Appx. 10 (2d Cir., 2014) [Fed & State Judicial Remedies] [Petition Denied]
West v Dobrev, 2013 WL 5813749 (10th Cir, 2013) [France] [Belgium] [Summary Determination]
White v White, 2012 WL 3041660 (S.D.N.Y.)  [Germany] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Rooker-Feldman Doctrine] [Res Judicata] [Collateral Estoppel][Failure to State a Claim]
Wood v Wood, 2013 WL 1907492, (E. D. Washington) [United Kingdom] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies ][Temporary Restraining Order] [Deposit Passport with Court]
Yang v Tsui, 416 F.3d 199 (3d Cir.,2005) [Canada] [Abstention]
Zajaczkowski v. Zajaczkowska, 932 F. Supp. 128 (D. Maryland) [Poland] [Petition treated as habeas corpus]


Habitual Residence

Aly v. Aden, 2013 WL 593420 (D. Mn) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Attorneys Fees & Costs Clearly Inappropriate] [Petition Granted]
Application of Adan, 437 F.3d 381 (3rd Cir. 2006) [Argentina]
Application of Falls v. Downe, 871 F. Supp. 100 (D. Mass., 1994) [Germany]
Application of Inna Kharlamova v. Roach, 2014 WL 4983837 (WD, Washington) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Petition granted]
Application of Nicholson v. Nicholson, 1997 WL 446432 (D. Kan.) [Germany]
Application of Ponath, 829 F. Supp. 363, 367 (D. Utah 1993) [Germany]
Arboleda v. Arenas, 311 F.Supp.2d 336 (E. D. N. Y., 2004) [Colombia]
 
Armiliato v. Zaric-Armiliato, 169 F.Supp.2d 230 (S. D. N. Y. 2001)  [Italy]

Avila v. Morales, 2013 WL 5499806 (D.Colo.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Telephone appearance]
Barr v Barr, 2011 WL 797664 (S.D.Tex.) [United Kingdom]
Barzilay v Barzilay, 600 F.3d 912 (8th Cir 2010) [israel]
Bedder v Bedder, 2013 WL 504022 (S.D.Ohio) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Granted]
Berezowsky v. Ojeda, 2013 WL 150714 (S.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of Custody] [Deposit Passport] [Petition Granted]
Berezowsky v Ojeda, 2014 WL 4216286 (5th Cir, 2014) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [No Habitual Residence]
Bernal v. Gonzalez,--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 7113186 (W.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of Custody] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 16 & 17] [Petition Granted]
Bocquet v Ouzid, 225 F.Supp.2d 1337 (2003) [France]

Bowen v. Bowen, 2014 WL 2154905 (W.D.Pa.) [Northern Ireland] [Habitual Residence] [Consent] [Wishes of Child] [Petition denied]
Brennan v. Cibault, 227 A.D.2d 965, 643 N.Y.S.2d 780 (4th Dept 1996)  [France]
Brosselin v Harless, 2011 WL 6130419 (W.D.Wash.) [Habitual Residence] [France]
Burch v Burch, 2013 WL 1909472 (S.D.Ind.) [Finland] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of Custody] [Petition Granted]
Bustamente v Serrano-Figueroa, 207 F.Supp.2d 1205 (D. Colorado,, 2002) [Mexico]
Cabrera v. Lozano, 323 F.Supp.2d 1303 (S.D. Florida, 2004) [Argentina]
Carranco v Munoz, 2013 WL 150760 (D.N.J.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Granted]
Carrasco v. Carrillo-Castro, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 1948996 (D.N.M.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence]
Darin v. Olivero-Huffman, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 1053775 (C.A.1 (Puerto Rico)) [Argentina] [Habitual Residence] [Consent] [Acquiescence] [Petition granted]
Darin v. Olivero-Huffman, 2012 WL 3542514 (D. Puerto Rico) [Argentina] [Habitual Residence] [Consent]
Daunis v. Daunis, 222 Fed.Appx. 32 (2d Cir., 2007) [Italy] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
David B. v. Helen O., 164 Misc. 2d 566, 625 N.Y.S.2d 436 (Fam. Ct. 1995) [Nigeria] [United Kingdom] 
David S. v. Zamira S., 151 Misc. 2d 630, 574 N.Y.S.2d 429 (Fam. Ct. 1991) [Canada]

De La Vera v Holguin, 2014 WL 4979854 (D. NJ) [Spain] [Habitual Residence] [Petition granted]
Deloyve v Lee, 329 F.3d 330 (3rd Cir.,2003) [Germany]
Estrada v. Salas-Perez, 2012 WL 4503147 (N.D.Ill.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Feder v. Evans-Feder, 63 F.3d 217 (3d Cir.1995) [Australia]
Fernandez v. Somaru, 2012 WL 3553779 (M.D.Fla.) [Costa Rica] [Habitual Residence]
Friedrich v. Friedrich, 983 F.2d 1396 (6th Cir. 1993) [Germany]
Gallardo v. Orozco, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 3803905 (W.D.Tex) {Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Patria Potestad] [Petition Granted]
Gitter v Gitter,  2003 WL 22775375 (E. D. N. Y. 2003) [Habitual Residence]
Gitter v. Gitter, 396 F.3d 124 (2nd Cir.,2005)  [Israel]
Guzzo v Cristofano, 2011 WL 6934108 (S.D.N.Y.)[Italy] [Habitual Residence]
Guzzo v. Cristofano, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 2476835 (C.A.2 (N.Y.))  [Italy] [Habitual Residence]
Hamprecht v Hamprecht, 2012 WL 1890857 (M.D.Fla.) [Germany ] [Habitual Residence]
Hanley v Roy , 485 F.3d 641 (11th Cir. (Fla.) 2007) [Ireland]
Haruno v Haruno, 2013 WL 5663070 (D.Nev.) [New Zealand] [Habitual Residence] [Consent]
Headifen v. Harker, 2013 WL 2538897 (W.D.Tex.) [New Zealand] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
Hofmann v Sender,--- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 1955846 (C.A.2) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Consent or Acquiesence]
Holder v Holder, 392 F.3d 1009 (9th Cir. 2004) [Germany]
Hollis v O’ Driscoll, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 43890 (C.A.2 (N.Y.) [New Zealand] [Habitual Residence] [Costs]
Holmes v Holmes, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 3610218 (E.D.Mich.) [Ireland] [Habitual Residence]
In re A.L.C., 2014 WL 1571274 (C.D.Cal.) [Sweden] [Habitual Residence ] [Acquiescence] [Fundamental Freedoms] [Petition granted]
In re ALC, --- Fed.Appx. ----, Not for publication, 2015 WL 1742347 (C.A.9 (Cal.)) [Sweden] [Habitual Residence]
In re Morris, 55 F.Supp.2d 1156 (D. Colo. 1999) [Switzerland]
Jenkins v Jenkins, 569 F.3d 549 (6 Cir 2009) [Israel]
Jensie v Jensie, 2012 WL 5178168 (E.D.Ky.) [Sweden] [Habitual Residence]
Johnson v Johnson, 2011 WL 569876 (S.D.N.Y.) [Italy]
Kijowska v. Haines, 463 F.3d 583 (C.A.7 (Ill.),2006) [Poland]
Kanth v. Kanth, 79 F.Supp.2d 1317 (D. Utah 1999) [Australia]

Karkkainen v Kovalchuk 445 F.3d 280 (3rd Cir. (Pa.) 2006)  [Finland] 
Koch v Koch, 416 F.Supp.2d 645 ( E. D. Wisconsin, 2006) [Germany]

Koch v Koch, 450 F.3d 703 (7th Cir.,2006) [Germany]
Lachman v Lachman,  2008 WL 5054198 (E.D.N.Y.) [England] [Habitual Residence]
Langa v Langa, --- Fed.Appx. ----, 2014 WL 60110 (C.A.3 (N.J.))[South Africa] [Habitual Residence]
Larbie v Larbie, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 3089773 (C.A.5 (Tex.) [United Kingdom] [Moot Appeal ][Consent and Acquiescence] [Habitual Residence]
Levesque v Levesque, 816 F. Supp. 662 (D. Kansas, 1993) [Germany]
Londono v Gonzalez, 2013 WL 6093782 (D. Mass)  [Colombia] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
Luedtke v Luedtke Thomsen, 2012 WL 2562405 (S.D.Ind.) [Switzerland] [Habitual Residence]
Lutman v Lutman, 2010 WL 3398985 (M.D.Pa.) [Isreal] [Habitual Residence]
March v Levine, 136 F.Supp.2d 831, (M.D. Tennessee, 2000) [Mexico]
March v. Levine, 249 F.3d 462 (6th Cir. 2001) [Mexico]
Marquez v Castillo, 2014 WL 6883134 ( M.D. Florida)  [Mexico] [Habitual Residence]
Matter of SLC, 2014 WL 2801053 (M.D.Fla.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Petition granted]
Mauvais v Herissee, 2014 WL 1454452 (D.Mass.)) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition granted]
Mauvis v Herisse, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 5659412 (C.A.1 (Mass.)[Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Granted]
Maxwell v Maxwell, 588 F.3d 245 (4th Cir.(N.C.) 2009) [Australia]
Maynard v. Maynard, 484 F.Supp.2d 654,  (E .D. Mich., 2007) [Australia]
Menechem v Menechem,246 F.Supp.2d 437 (D. Md., 2003) [Israel]

McCurdy v Shreve-McCurdy, 2011 WL 1457158 (E.D.Mich.) [Canada] [Habitual Residence]
Mendez v. May, --- F.3d ----2015 WL 627215 (1st Cir.,2015) [Argentina] [Habitual Residence]
Meredith v. Meredith, 759 F. Supp. 1432, 1433 (D.Ariz.1991) [France]

Mero v Prieto, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2008 WL 2331927 (E.D.N.Y.) [Mexico]
Mckenzie v McKenzie, 168 F.Supp.2d 47 (2001) [Germany]
Mendoza v Silva, 2013 WL 6491479 (N.D.Iowa) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Consent or acquiescence] [video testimony] [Petition Granted] [Stay pending appeal denied]
Miller v Miller, 240 F.3d 392, (4th Cir.,2001) [Canada]
Mota v. Castillo, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 3330176 (C.A.2 (N.Y.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence]
Mozes v Mozes, 239 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir, 2001) [Israel]
Murphy v Sloan, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 4179961 (C.A.9 (Cal.)) [Ireland] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
Neergaard v Colon, 2014 WL 936691 (D.Mass.)[Singapore] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Granted]
Neergaard-Colon v Neergaard, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 2111307 (C.A.1 (Mass.)) [Singapore] [Habitual Residence] [Remanded]
Nelson v Petterle, 2011 WL 1048107 (E.D.Cal.) [Iceland] [Habitual Residence]
Nicolson v Pappalardo, 674 F.Supp.2d 295, (D. Maine, 2010) [Australia]
Nicolson v Pappalardo, --- F.3d ----, 2010 WL 1730393 (1st Cir.(Me.))[Australia]
Norinder v Fuentes, --- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 3966153 (7th Cir.(Ill.))[Sweden] [Discovery] 
Nunez-Escudero v. Tice-Menley, 58 F.3d 374 (8th Cir.1995) [Mexico]

Ordon Ez v. Tacuri, 2009 WL 2928903 (E.D.N.Y. 2009) [Ecuador]
Ozgul v. Ozgul, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 3981238 (D.Colo.) [Germany] [Habitual Residence]
Panteleris v Panteleris, 2014 WL 3053211 (N.D.Ohio) [Australia] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of Custody] [Petition granted]
Panteleris v. Panteleris, --- Fed.Appx. ----, 2015 WL 468197(6th Cir., 2015) [Australia] [Habitual Residence]
Pasten v Velasquez, 462 F.Supp.2d 1206 (M.D. Alabama, 2006) [Chile]
Papakosmas v Papakosmas, 483 F.3d 617 (9th Cir.(Cal.) 2007) [Greece]
Paz v Paz, 169 F.Supp.2d 254 (S.D. New York, 2001) [ New Zealand]
Prouse v. Thoreson, 2012 WL 5199182 (W.D.Wis.) [Italy] [Habitual Residence]
Redmond v Redmond, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 3821595 (C.A.7 (Ill.))[Ireland] [Habitual Residence]
Rehder v Rehder, 2014 WL 6982530 ( W.D. Wash) [Germany] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of Custody] [Petition granted]
Robert v Tesson, 507 F.3d 981 (6th Cir., 2007) [France]
Rodriguez v. Sieler, 2012 WL 5430369 (D.Mont.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 20]
Rydder v Rydder, 49 F.3d 369 (8th Cir.,1995)  [Poland]
Saldivar v Rodela, 2012 WL 2914833 (W.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of custody] [Consent]
Sanchez-Londono v. Gonzalez, 752 F.3d 533 (1st Cir., 2014) [Colombia] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
San Martin v. Moquillaza, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2014 WL 3924646 (E.D.Tex.) [Peru] [Habitual Residence] [Petition granted]
Sasson v. Sasson, 327 F.Supp.2d 489 (D. New Jersey, 2004) [Israel]
Sealed Appellee v Sealed Appellant, --- Fed.Appx. ----, 2014 WL 3585835 (C.A.5 (Tex.))[Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Granted]
Seaman v Patterson, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 124223 (M.D.Ga.) [Mexico][Habitual Residence] [Rights of Custody - patria potestas]
Seaman v. Peterson, 2014 WL 4377582, --- F.3d ---- (11th Cir., 2014) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Petition granted]
Selo v. Selo, 2013 WL 878959 (E.D.Mich.) [Switzerland] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
Sheikh v. Cahill, 145 Misc. 2d 171, 546 N.Y.S.2d 517 (Sup. Ct. 1989) [Canada]
Silverman v Silverman, 338 F.3d 886 (8th Cir, 2003) [Israel]

Silvestri v Oliva, 403 F.Supp.2d 378 ( D. New Jersey, 2005) [Argentina]
Slagenweit v. Slagenweit, 841 F. Supp. 264 (N.D. Iowa 1993), dismissed, 43 F.3d 1476 and dismissed, 43 F.3d 1476. [Germany]
Sorenson v Sorenson, 559 F.3d 871 (8th Cir 2009) [Australia]
Stern v Stern, --- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 1706912 (8th Cir.(Iowa)) [Isreal] [Habitual Residence]
Taylor v Hunt, 2013 WL 620934 (E.D.Tex.) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Guardian Ad Litem] [Guardian Fees] [Petition Granted]
Tenorio Ruiz v Tenorio, 392 F.3d 1247 (11th Cir.) [Mexico]

Thomson v Gnirk, 2012 WL 3598854 (D.N.H.) [Canada] [Habitual Residence]
Tlustochowicz v. Tlustochowicz, 2012 WL 3779071 (N.D.Ill.) [Poland] [Article 15] [Habitual Residence] 
Tsarbopoulos v Tsarbopoulos, 176 F.Supp.2d 1045 (E.D. Washington)  [Greece]

Valenzuela v Michel, 2013 WL 6038240 (9th Cir., 2013) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence]
Velasquez v. Funes de Velasquez, 2015 WL 1565142 [E.D. Virginia ] [El Salvador] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Vilchis v. Hall, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2014 WL 2978378 (N.D.Ill.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
Walker v Walker, 2013 WL 1110876 (N.D.Ill.) [Australia] [Habitual Residence] [Age & Maturity] [Petition Granted]
Walker v Walker, 2012 WL 5668330 (C.A.7 (Ill.) [Australia] [Habitual Residence] [Consent]
Whiting v Krassner, 391 F3d 540 ( 3rd Cir, 2004) [Canada]
Yang v Tsui, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2006 WL 2466095 (W. D. Pa) [Canada]
Yang v Tsui, --- F.3d ----, 2007 WL 2377463 (C.A.3 (Pa.)) [Canada]
Zuker v. Andrews, 2 F.Supp.2d 134 (D. Mass. 1998) [Argentina]


Habitual Residence - English Case of In re Bates

In re Bates, High Court of Justice, No. CA 122/89, Family Division, Royal Courts of Justice, London WC2, February 23, 1989 [United Kingdom]

Notice of Commencement of Proceedings

Brooke v Willis, 907 F. Supp. 57 (S.D. N. Y. 1995) [United Kingdom] [ Notice of proceedings]
Egervary v. Rooney, 80 F.Supp.2d 491 (E. D. Pa. 2000) [Hungary]
Green v Green, NYLJ, 7-6-93, P.33, Col. 2, Sup. Ct., Kings Co. (Rigler, J.)

Klam v. Klam, 797 F. Supp. 202 (E. D. N. Y. 1992) [Gemany]

Rydder v Rydder, 49 F.3d 369 (8th Cir.,1995) [Poland]


​
New York State Court Cases

Matter of MG v WZ, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2014 WL 5026267 (N.Y.Fam.Ct.) [New York Family Court] [Dominican Republic] [Habitual Residence]
Matter of R.B v. K.G., 2014 WL 5347587 (Fam Ct, 2014) [New York Family Court] [Israel] [Well Settled] [Age and Maturity]
 

Rights of Custody and Rights of Access

A.A.M. v. J.L.R.C.,--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 75049 (E.D.N.Y.) [Mexico] [Rights of Custody] [Patria Potestas]
Abbott v Abbott, --- S.Ct. ----, 2010 WL 1946730 [Chile] [Rights of Custody]
Abbott v Abbott, 495 F.Supp.2d 635 (W.D. Texas, 2007) [Chile] [Rights of Custody] 
Abbott v Abbott, 542 F.3d 1081 (5th Cir. 2008) [Chile] [Rights of Custody]
Aguirre v Calle, 2008 WL 4461931 (E. D. N. Y.)  [Colombia] [Patria Potestas Creates Rights of Custody]
Aldinger v. Segler, 263 F.Supp.2d 284 (D. Puerto Rico) [Germany] [Rights of Custody]

Antunez-Fernandes v. Connors-Fernandes, 259 F.Supp.2d 800 (N. D. Iowa 2003)  [France] [Joint parental responsibility]

In re Application of Adams ex rel. Naik v. Naik, 363 F.Supp.2d 1025 ( N.D. Illinois, 2005)  [United Kingdom] [Rights of Custody]
Avendano v Smith, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 3702401 (D.N.M.)  [Mexico] [Rights of Custody] [Patria potestas] [Grave Risk of Harm ] [Attorneys fees]
Bader v Kramer, 445 F.3d 346 (4th Cir., 2006) ("Bader I") [Germany] [Presumption of joint custody]
Bader v Kramer, 484 F.3d 666 (4th Cir., 2007) [Exercise Rights of Custody]
Cantor v Cohen, 442 F.3d 196 (4th Cir. 2006)  [ Israel]   [No jurisdiction to enforce rights of Access]
Carvajal v. Chavarria,--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 6442704 (D.Conn.) [Costa Rica] [Rights of Custody] [Consent ] [Grave risk of harm] [Petition Granted][

Croll v. Croll, 229 F.3d 133 (2d Cir.2000)  [Hong Kong] [Ne exeat not right of custody]

Doudle v. Gause, 282 F.Supp.2d 922 (N. D. Ind. 2003)   [Austria] [Rights of Custody]
Duran v Beaumont, 542 F.3d 1081, 2008 WL 2780656 (2nd Cir. (N.Y.)) [Chile] Ne Exeat Not Right of Custody] [Can enforce Rights of Access]
Duran v Beaumont, 130 S Ct 3318, 176 L Ed 2d 1216 [2010] [Chile] [Rights of Custody]
East Sussex Children Services v. Morris, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 243403 (N.D.W.Va.) [United Kingdom] [Rights of Custody] [Deposit Passport] [Petition Granted]
Felder v. Ponder, 2012 WL 3128570 (D.Mass.) [Switzerland] [Rights of Custody]
Felder v. Wetzel, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 4465591 (C.A.1 (Mass.)) [Switzerland] [Rights of Custody]
Furnes v Reeves, 362 F.3d 702 (11th Cir., 2004)  [Norway]  [ne exeat right of custody]
Garcia v Angarita, 440 F.Supp.2d 1364 (S.D. Florida, 2006) [Colombia] [patria potestas right of custody]
Application of Garcia v Varona--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 3805778 (N.D.Ga.) [Spain] [Rights of custody] [Patria potestas ] [Consent] [Abandonment]
Giampaolo v. Erneta, 390 F.Supp.2d 1269 (N.D. Georgia, 2004) [Argentina] [Rights of Custody]
Gil v. Rodriguez, 184 F.Supp.2d 1221, (M.D. Florida, 2002)  [Venezuela] [patria potestas right of custody]
Gonzalez v. Gutierrez, 311 F.3d 942 (9th Cir. 2002)    [Mexico] [Ne exeat not right of custody]
Hazbun Escaf v. Rodriquez, 200 F.Supp.2d 603 (E. D. Va. 2002)   [Colombia] [Rights of custody]
Hanley v Roy , 485 F.3d 641 (11th Cir. (Fla.) 2007)  [Ireland] [Rights of Custody]
Ibarra v Quintanilla Garcia, 476 F.Supp.2d 630 (S. D. Texas, 2007) [Mexico] [Rights of Custody]
In re DD, 440 F.Supp.2d 1283 (M.D. Florida,2006) [France] [Rights of Custody]
In re Polson, 578 F.Supp.2d 1064 (S. D. Ill. 2008) [Australia]
In re Robinson, 983 F. Supp. 1339 (D. Colo. 1997) [United Kingdom] [Rights of Custody]
Jacksic v Serif, Not Reported in F.Supp.3d, 2014 WL 6685375 (D.Ariz.) [Serbia] [Rights of Custody] [Petition denied]
Judge v Williams, 2011 WL 3100346 (E.D.N.C.) [Ireland] [Rights of Custody]
Krefter v Willis, 623 F.Supp.2d 125 (D. Mass. 2009) {Germany] [Rights of Custody]
Kufner v Kufner, 440 F.Supp.2d 491 (D.R.I., 2007)  [Germany] [Rights of Custody]

Lalo v. Malca, 318 F.Supp.2d 1152 (S.D., Florida, 2004) [Panama]  [ne exeat right of custody] [patria potestas right of custody]

Ly v Heu, 296 F.Supp.2d 1009 ( D. Minnesota, 2003) [France ] [No jurisdiction to enforce right of access]
Lynch v Mendez Lynch, 220 F.Supp.2d 1347, ( M.D. Florida, 2002)  [Argentina] [Rights of custody]
Matter of Leslie v. Noble, 377 F.Supp.2d 1232 (S.D. Florida, 2005)  [Belize] [Rights of Custody]
Norden-Powers v. Beveridge, 125 F.Supp.2d 634 (E. D. N. Y. 2000)   [Australia] [Joint parental responsibility]
Ortiz v Cantu, 2009 WL 8543610 (S.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Rights of custody] [Patria Postestas]
Ozaltin v Ozaltin, 708 F.3d 355 (2d Cir. 2013) [Turkey] [Rights of Access] [Attorney Fees]
Ozaltin v Ozaltin, 2012 WL 2026443 (S.D.N.Y.) [Turkey] [Well-Settled] [Rights of access]
Panteleris v Panteleris, 2014 WL 3053211 (N.D.Ohio) [Australia] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of Custody] [Petition granted]
Pasten v Velasquez, 462 F.Supp.2d 1206 (M.D. Alabama, 2006) [Chile] [Rights of custody]
Patrick v. Rivera-Lopez, 2012 WL 5462677 (D.Puerto Rico) [England] [Rights of Custody]
Pesin v Osorio Rodriguez, 77 F.Supp.2d 1277 ( S.D. Florida, 1999)      [Venezuela] [Rights of Custody]

Pesin v. Rodriguez, 244 F.3d 1250 (11th Cir. 2001)   [Venezuela] [Fugitive disentitlement]

Pielage v McConnell, 516 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2008) (11th Cir. 2008) [Netherlands] [Retention defined]
Radu v Toader, 2011 WL 3418368 (E.D.N.Y.) [Romania] [Rights of Custody] [Ne Exeat Rights]
Radu v Toder, 2012 WL 556174 (C.A.2 (N.Y.) [Romania] [Rights of Custody]
Roy v Roy, 432 F.Supp.2d 1297 (S.D. Florida, 2006) [Ireland] [Rights of Custody]
Saldivar v Rodela, 2012 WL 2914833 (W.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of custody] [Consent]
Sealed Appellant v Sealed Appellee 394 F.3d 338 (5th Cir. (Tex.) 2004)     [Australia] [Rights of custody]
Shalit v. Coppe, 182 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir., 1999)    [Israel] [Rights of custody]     
Shealy v. Shealy, 295 F.3d 1117 (10th Cir., 2002)  [Germany] [Equal de jure custody]
Teijeiro Fernandez v. Yeager, 121 F.Supp.2d 1118 (W. D. Mich. 2000)  [Spain] [No jurisdiction to enforce right of access]
Vale v. Avila, 2008 U.S. App. Lexis 17068 (7 Cir. 2008) [Venezuela] [Patria Posestas and Ne Exeat Right Creates Right of  Custody]
Walton v. Walton, 925 F. Supp. 453 (S.D. Miss., 1996)  [Australia] [Rights of custody]
Whallon v. Lynn, 230 F.3d 450 (1st Cir. 2000)  [Mexico] [patria potestas right of custody]
White v White, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 2284877 (C.A.4 (Va.)) [Switzerland] [Rights of Custody]
Wiezel v Wiezel-Tyrnauer 385 F.Supp.2d 240 (S. D. N. Y., 2005) [No jurisdiction to enforce right of access]

Wiggill v Janicki, 262 F.Supp.2d 687 ( S.D. West Virginia, 2003)   [England] [No jurisdiction to enforce right of access]

Wojcik v. Wojcik, 959 F.Supp.2d 413 (ED. Mich. 1997) [France] [joint custody presumption]

Yang v Tsui,  416 F.3d 199 (3d Cir.,2005) [Canada]

Yang v Tsui, 499 F.3d 259 (3d Cir., 2007) [Canada] [Rights of Custody]
 
Wrongful Removal or Retention

Belay v Getachew, 272 F.Supp.2d 553,(D. Md., 2003)  [Sweden]
Diorinou v. Mezitis, 237 F.3d 133 (2d Cir., 2001)  [Greece] 
Fabri v. Pritikin-Fabri, 221 F. Supp. 2d 859 (N.D. Ill. 2001) [Italy] 
Mozes v Mozes, 239 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir, 2001) [Israel] 
Shealy v. Shealy, 295 F.3d 1117 (10th Cir. 2002) [Germany]

  
Toren v. Toren, 191 F.3d 23 (1st Cir. 1999) [Israel]     

​
 Reported Federal and New York State Hague Convention Cases through May 20, 2015. (Alphabetical) 

Click to Visit "A Child is Missing: The International Child  Abduction Blog" - Our blog devoted to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Hague Convention Articles are reported on this website and Hague Convention cases since May 20, 2015 are reported on our blog.  



A.A.M. v. J.L.R.C.,--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 75049 (E.D.N.Y.) [Mexico] [Rights of Custody] [Patria Potestas]Abbott v Abbott, --- S.Ct. ----, 2010 WL 1946730
Abbott v Abbott, 495 F.Supp.2d 635 (W.D. Texas, 2007)
Abbott v Abbott, 542 F.3d 1081 (5th Cir. 2008)
Acosta v Acosta, 2012 WL 2178982 (D.Minn.) [Peru] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Acosta v Acosta,--- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 3970239 (C.A.8 (Minn.)) [Peru][Grave Risk of Harm] [Expert opinion]
Aguilera v. De Lara, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2014 WL 3427548 (D.Ariz.)[Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition granted]
Aguilera v. De Lara, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2014 WL 4204947 (D.Ariz.) [Mexico] [Necessary Expenses]
Aguirre v Calle, 2008 WL 4461931 (E. D. N. Y.) [Colombia] [Default] [Rights of Custody]
Alcala v Hernandez, 2014 WL 5506739 (D.S.C.) [Mexico] [Provisional Remedies] [Temporary Restraining Order] [Judicial Notice]
Alcala v. Hernandez, 2015 WL 1893291 (D.S.C.) [Mexico] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Testimony by Video]
Aldinger v Segler,  157 Fed. Appx. 317 (1st Cir.,2005) [Attorneys Fees & Costs]

Application of Adan, 437 F.3d 381 (3rd Cir. 2006)
Application of Falls v. Downe, 871 F. Supp. 100 (D. Mass., 1994)
Application of Inna Kharlamova v. Roach, 2014 WL 4983837 (WD, Washington) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Petition granted]
Application of Ponath, 829 F. Supp. 363, 367 (D. Utah 1993)
Application of Stead v Menduno, Not Reported in F.Supp.3d, 2014 WL 6819547 (D.Colo.)  [ New Zealand] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Expert Testimony]
Anderson v. Acree, 250 F.Supp.2d 876 (S.D. Ohio 2002)
Aldinger v. Segler, 263 F.Supp.2d 284 (D. Puerto Rico)
Aly v. Aden, 2013 WL 593420 (D. Mn) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Attorneys Fees & Costs Clearly Inappropriate] [Petition Granted]
Antunez-Fernandes v. Connors-Fernandes, 259 F.Supp.2d 800 (N. D. Iowa 2003)
Aranda v Serna, 2013 WL 665064 (M.D.Tenn.) [Mexico] [Well Settled ][Age and Maturity] [Petition Denied]
Arboleda v. Arenas, 311 F.Supp.2d 336 (E. D. N. Y., 2004)
 

Armiliato v. Zaric-Armiliato, 169 F.Supp.2d 230 (S. D. N. Y. 2001)
Arulpragasam v. Bronfman, 2013 WL 2249256 (E.D.N.Y.) [England] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Use of Pseudonyms in Civil Litigation]
Asvesta v Petroutsas, 580 F.3d 1000 (9th Cir 2009)
Avendano v Smith, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 3702401 (D.N.M.)  [Mexico] [Rights of Custody] [Patria potestas] [Grave Risk of Harm ] [Attorneys fees]
Avila v. Morales, 2013 WL 5499806 (D.Colo.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Telephone appearance]
Bader v Kramer, 445 F.3d 346 (4th Cir., 2006) ("Bader I")
Bader v Kramer, 484 F.3d 666 (4th Cir., 2007)
Baran v Beaty,  479 F.Supp.2d 1257 (S.D. Alabama, 2007)
Baran v Beaty, 526 F.3d 1340 (11th Cir. (Ala.))
Barr v Barr, 2011 WL 797664 (S.D.Tex.) [United Kingdom]
Barzilay v Barzilay, 536 F.3d 844 (8th Cir. 2008)
Barzilay v Barzilay, 600 F.3d 912 (8th Cir 2010)
Baxter v. Baxter, 324 F.Supp.2d 536 (D. Delaware, 2004) 
Baxter v. Baxter, 423 F.3d  363  (3rd Cir., 2005)

Bedder v Bedder, 2013 WL 504022 (S.D.Ohio) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Granted]
Bekier v. Bekier, 248 F.3d 1051 (11th Cir. 2001) 
Belay v Getachew, 272 F.Supp.2d 553,(D. Md. 2003)
Buenaver v Vasquez, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2014 WL 3058250 (E.D.N.Y.) [Colombia] [Now Settled] [Petition Granted]
Berendsen v Nichols, 938 F.Supp. 737 (D. Kan., 1996)
Berezowsky v. Ojeda, 2013 WL 150714 (S.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of Custody] [Deposit Passport] [Petition Granted]
Berezowsky v Ojeda, 2014 WL 4216286 (5th Cir, 2014) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [No Habitual Residence]
Bernal v. Gonzalez,--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 7113186 (W.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of Custody] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 16 & 17] [Petition Granted]
Biel v. Bekmukhamedova, --- F.Supp.2d ---- 2013 WL 4574161 (E.D. Louisiana.) [Luxembourg] [Younger and Colorado River Abstention]
Blanc v Morgan, 721 F.Supp.2d 749 (WD Tenn 2010)
Blondin v. Dubois, 19 F. Supp. 2d 123 (S. D. N. Y. 1998), judgment vacated, 189 F.3d 240 (2d Cir. 1999) 78 F. Supp. 2d 283, 288-93 (S. D. N. Y. 2000) ("Blondin III"), 238 F.3d 153 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) 2001) ("Blondin IV")
Bobadilla v Cordero, 2014 WL 3869998 (M.D.N.C.) Mexico] [Now Settled] [Discretion to Order Return] [Petition granted]
Bocquet v Ouzid, 225 F.Supp.2d 1337 (2003)
Boehm v Boehm, 2011 WL 863066 (M.D.Fla.)
Bowen v. Bowen, 2014 WL 2154905 (W.D.Pa.) [Northern Ireland] [Habitual Residence] [Consent] [Wishes of Child] [Petition denied]
Brennan v. Cibault, 227 A.D.2d 965, 643 N.Y.S.2d 780 (4th Dept 1996)
Broca v. Giron, 2012 WL 7660123 (E.D.N.Y.)  [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Age and Maturity]
Broca v Giron,--- Fed.Appx. ----, 2013 WL 3745985 (C.A.2 (N.Y.)) [Mexico] [Well-Settled]
Broda v Abarca, 2011 WL 900983 (D.Colo.)
Brooke v Willis, 907 F. Supp. 57 (S.D. N. Y. 1995)
Bromley v Bromley, 30 F.Supp.2d 857 (E. D. Pennsylvania, 1988)
Brosselin v Harless, 2011 WL 6130419 (W.D.Wash.) [Habitual Residence] [France]
Burch v Burch, 2013 WL 1909472 (S.D.Ind.) [Finland] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of Custody] [Petition Granted]
Bustamente v Serrano-Figueroa, 207 F.Supp.2d 1205 (D. Colorado,, 2002)
Cabrera v. Lozano, 323 F.Supp.2d 1303 (S.D. Florida, 2004)
Cantor v Cohen, 442 F.3d 196 (4th Cir. 2006)
Caro v Sanchez, 2013 WL 5300671 (D.N.J.) [Spain] [Consent] [Petition Denied]
Carnelli v Pas, 2011 WL 1983360 (D.N.J.)
Carranco v Munoz, 2013 WL 150760 (D.N.J.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Granted]
Carrasco v. Carrillo-Castro, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 1948996 (D.N.M.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence]
Carrascosa v Mcguire, 520 F.3d 249 (3d Cir. 2008)
Carvajal v. Chavarria,--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 6442704 (D.Conn.) [Costa Rica] [Rights of Custody] [Consent ] [Grave risk of harm] [Petition Granted]
Cascio v Pace, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2014 WL 197724 (N.D.Ill.) [Italy] [Rights of Custody] [Public Service Org] [Consent] [well settled] [Petition denied]
Castillo v Castillo, 597 F.Supp.2d 432 (D. Delaware, 2009)
Castro v  Martinez, 2012 WL 359901 (W.D.Tex.)) [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 20]
Cuellar v Joyce, 596 F.3d 505 (9th Cir. (Mont.))
Cuellar v Joyce, 603 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir 2010) 
Cerit v. Cerit, 188 F.Supp.2d 1239 (D.Haw.2002)
Chafin v Chafin, --- S.Ct. ----, 2013 WL 598436 (U.S.) [Scotland][ Federal & State Judicial Remedies - Appeals - Mootness]
Charalambous v Charalambous, --- F.3d ----, 2010 WL 4963063 (1st Cir.(Me.))
Charalambous v Charalambous, 744 F.Supp.2d 375 (D. Maine 2010)
Charalambous v Charalambous, 744 F.Supp.2d 379 (D. Maine 2010)
Choi v. Kim, 404 F. Supp. 495 (S. D. N. Y., 2005)
Copeland v Copeland, 134 F3d 362 (4th Cir., 1998)
Croll v. Croll, 229 F.3d 133 (2d Cir.2000)
Culculoglu v Culculoglu, 2013 WL 4045905 (D.Nev.)) [Canada] [Consent or Acquiescence] [Petition Denied]
Culculoglu v Culculoglu, 2013 WL 1413231 (D.Nev.) [Canada] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Temporary Restraining Order Granted] [Delivery of Passport to Court]
Currier v. Currier, 845 F. Supp. 916 (D.N.H.1994)
Dalsgaard v Montoya, 2011 WL 5037223 (M.D.Fla.) [Denmark] [Habitual Residence] [Wishes of the child defense]
Danipour v. McLarey, 286 F.3d 1 (1st Cir., 2002)
Darin v. Olivero-Huffman, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 1053775 (C.A.1 (Puerto Rico)) [Argentina] [Habitual Residence] [Consent] [Acquiescence] [Petition granted]
Darin v. Olivero-Huffman, 2012 WL 3542514 (D. Puerto Rico) [Argentina] [Habitual Residence] [Consent]
Daunis v. Daunis, 222 Fed.Appx. 32 (2d Cir., 2007) [Italy] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
David B. v. Helen O., 164 Misc. 2d 566, 625 N.Y.S.2d 436 (Fam. Ct. 1995) 
David S. v. Zamira S., 151 Misc. 2d 630, 574 N.Y.S.2d 429 (Fam. Ct. 1991)
Dawson v McPherson, 2014 WL 4748512 (M.D.N.C.) [United Kingdom] [Necessary Costs]
De La Vera v Holguin, 2014 WL 4979854 (D. NJ) [Spain] [Habitual Residence] [Petition granted]
Deloyve v Lee, 329 F.3d 330 (3rd Cir.,2003)
Demaj v Sakaj, 2012 WL 476168 (D.Conn.) [Italy] [Discovery]
Demaj v. Sakaj, 2012 WL 3822015 (D.Conn.) [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Evidence of Parental Alienation]
DeSilva v Pitts, 481 F.3d 1279 (10th Cir.2007)
De Vasconcelos v De Paula Batista, 2011 WL 806096 (E.D.Tex.)
Di Guiseppe v DiGuiseppe, 2008 WL 1743079 (E.D. Michigan) [Canada] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Age and Maturity]
Diabo v Delisle, 500 F.Supp.2d 159 (N.D. New York, 2007) 
Didur v Viger, 392 F.Supp.2d 1268 (D. Kansas, 2005) 
Didur v Viger, (10th Cir. 2006) No. 05-3440 D.C. No. 05-CV-2188-
JWL)

Diorinou v. Mezitis, 237 F.3d 133 (2d Cir., 2001)
Distler v Distler, 26 F.Supp.2d 723 (D. New Jersey, 1998)
Doudle v. Gause, 282 F.Supp.2d 922 (N. D. Ind. 2003)
Duarte v Bardales, 526 F.3d 563 (9th Cir. 2008)
Duran v Beaumont, 534 F.3d 142 (2nd Cir. (N.Y.))
Duran v Beaumont, 130 S Ct 3318, 176 L Ed 2d 1216 [2010] [Chile] [Rights of Custody]
East Sussex Children Services v. Morris, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 243403 (N.D.W.Va.) [United Kingdom] [Rights of Custody] [Deposit Passport] [Petition Granted]
Ebanks v Ebanks, 2007 WL 2591196 (S.D.N.Y.) [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Service of process]
E.D.T. ex rel. Adamah v. Tayson, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 4116666 (E.D.N.Y.) [United Kingdom] [Attorneys fees and Costs]
Edoho v Edoho, 2010 WL 3257480, (S.D. Texas, 2010) [Bahamas] [Well-Settled in New Environment]
Egervary v. Rooney, 80 F.Supp.2d 491 (E. D. Pa. 2000)
Elyashiv v. Elyashiv, 353 F.Supp.2d 394 (E.D.N.Y., 2005)
England v. England, 234 F.3d 268 (5th Cir. 2000)
Ermini v Vittori, 2013 WL 1703590 (S.D.N.Y.) [Italy] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Ermani v Vittori, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 3056360 (C.A.2) [Italy] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Denied]
Escaf v. Rodriquez, 191 F. Supp. 2d 685 (E. D. Va. 2002)
Estrada v. Salas-Perez, 2012 WL 4503147 (N.D.Ill.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm
Etienne v. Zuniga, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 4918791 (W.D.Wash.) [Mexico][Well-Settled in New Environment]
Fabri v. Pritikin-Fabri, 221 F. Supp. 2d 859 (N.D. Ill. 2001)
Falk v Sinclair, 692 F.Supp.2d 147 (D. Maine., 2010)
Fawcett v McRoberts, 326 F.3d 491 (4th Cir.,2003)
Feder v. Evans-Feder, 63 F.3d 217 (3d Cir.1995)
Felder v. Ponder, 2012 WL 3128570 (D.Mass.) [Switzerland] [Rights of Custody]
Felder v. Wetzel, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 4465591 (C.A.1 (Mass.)) [Switzerland] [Rights of Custody]
Fernandez-Trejo v. Alvarez-Hernandez, 2012 WL 6106418 (M.D.Fla.) [Mexico] [Rights of Custody] [Equitable Tolling] [Well-Settled]
Fernandez v. Somaru, 2012 WL 3553779 (M.D.Fla.) [Costa Rica] [Habitual Residence]
Filipczak v Filipczak, 2013 WL 692694 (2d Cir 2013)  [Poland] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Well Settled]
Flynn v. Borders, 472 F.Supp.2d 906 ( E.D. Ky. 2007)
Font Paulus ex rel. P.F.V. v. Vittini Cordero, 2012 WL 2524772 (M.D.Pa.) [Dominican Republic] [Well Settled in New Environment] [Wishes of the Child]
Foster v Foster, 654 F. Supp 2d 348 (W. D. Pennsylvania, 2009)
Fridlund v Spychaj-Fridlund, 654 F. Supp 2d 634, ( E.D. Kentucky, 2009)
Friedrich v. Friedrich, 983 F.2d 1396 (6th Cir. 1993)

Friedrich v. Friedrich, 78 F.3d 1060 (6th Cir. 1996)
Freier v. Freier,  969 F. Supp. 436, 443 (E.D.Mich.1996)
Furnes v Reeves, 362 F.3d 702 (11th Cir., 2004)
Garcia v Angarita, 440 F.Supp.2d 1364 (S.D. Florida, 2006)
Application of Garcia v Varona--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 3805778 (N.D.Ga.) [Spain] [Rights of custody] [Patria potestas ] [Consent] [Abandonment]
Gallagher v. Gallagher, --- F.Supp.3d ----, 2014 WL 7251039 (D.Mass.) [Ireland] [Consent] [Petition granted]
Gaudin v. Remis, 379 F.3d 631 (9th Cir. (Hawaii) Mar 11, 2002)
Application of Gavia v Hernandez, 2013 WL 6115725 (D. Utah) [Mexico] [Guardian ad litem] [Well-Settled] [Age and Maturity] [Petition Denied]
Gwiazdowski v. Gwiazdowska, 2015 WL 1514436 (E.D.N.Y.) [Poland] [Well settled defense]
Gallardo v. Orozco, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 3803905 (W.D.Tex) {Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Patria Potestad] [Petition Granted]
Gee v Hendroffe, 2014 WL 60325 (D.Nev.) [South Africa] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [42 U.S.C. § 11603(b)]["Located"]
Gee v Hendroffe, 2013 WL 5375294 (D.Nev.)  [South Africa] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Jurisdiction] [Venue]
Gee v. Hendroffe, 2015 WL 2151885 (S.D.Tex.) [South Africa] [Costs and Expenses]
Giampaolo v. Erneta, 390 F.Supp.2d 1269 (N.D. Georgia, 2004)
Gil v. Rodriguez 184 F.Supp.2d 1221, (M.D. Florida, 2002)
Giles v Bravo, 2012 WL 704745 (D. Nev.) [Mexico] [Well Settled in New Environment] [Acquiescence]
Gitter v Gitter,  2003 WL 22775375 (E. D. N. Y. 2003) [Habitual Residence]
Gitter v. Gitter, 396 F.3d 124 (2nd Cir.,2005)
Gonzalez v. Gutierrez, 311 F.3d 942 (9th Cir. 2002)
Gonzalez-Caballero v. Mena, 251 F.3d 789 (9th Cir. (Ariz.) 2001)
Green v Green, N.Y.L.J., 7-6-93, P.33, Col. 2, Sup. Ct., Kings Co. (Rigler, J.)
Grieve v. Tamerin, 269 F.3d 149 (2d Cir. 2001)
Guzzo v Cristofano, 2011 WL 6934108 (S.D.N.Y.)[Italy] [Habitual Residence]
Guzzo v. Cristofano, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 2476835 (C.A.2 (N.Y.))  [Italy] [Habitual Residence]
Haimdas v Haimdas, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2010 WL 2342377 (E.D.N.Y.) 
Habrzyk v Habrzyk, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 1331674 (N.D.Ill.)
Hamprecht v Hamprecht, 2013 WL 1155675 (M.D.Fla.) [Germany] [ Attorney's Fees and Costs]
Hamprecht v Hamprecht, 2012 WL 1367534 (M.D.Fla.) [Germany] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies]
Hamprecht v Hamprecht, 2012 WL 1890857 (M.D.Fla.) [Germany ] [Habitual Residence]
Haruno v Haruno, 2013 WL 5663070 (D.Nev.) [New Zealand] [Habitual Residence] [Consent]
Hazbun Escaf v. Rodriquez, 200 F.Supp.2d 603 (E. D. Va. 2002)
Hanley v Roy , 485 F.3d 641 (11th Cir. (Fla.) 2007)
Haylock v. Ebanks, 2013 WL 5410463 (E.D.La.) [Honduras] Necessary Costs and Expenses]
Headifen v. Harker, 2013 WL 2538897 (W.D.Tex.) [New Zealand] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
Hirst v. Tiberghien, 2013 WL 6827813 (D.S.C.) [United Kingdom] [Attorney's Fees]
Hirst v. Tiberghien, 2013 WL 1867343 (D.S.C.) United Kingdom] [Age & Maturity] [Guardian] [Visitation] [Petition Granted]
Hirst v Tiberhagien, 2014 WL 3687425 (D.S.C.) [United Kingdom] [Necessary Expenses] [ Motion to Reconsider Denied]
Hofmann v Sender,--- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 1955846 (C.A.2) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Consent or Acquiesence]
Holder v. Holder, 305 F.3d 854 (9th Cir., 2002)
Holder v Holder, 392 F.3d 1009 (9th Cir. 2004)
Hollis v O’ Driscoll, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 43890 (C.A.2 (N.Y.) [New Zealand] [Habitual Residence] [Costs]
Holmes v Holmes, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 3610218 (E.D.Mich.) [Ireland] [Habitual Residence]
Hynes v. Berger, 2012 WL 4889854 (D.Md.) [Germany] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Denial of Notice and Opportunity to be Heard]
Ibarra v Quintanilla Garcia, 476 F.Supp.2d 630 (S. D. Texas, 2007)
In re A.A.S., 2014 WL 840010 (S.D.N.Y.)[Dominican Republic] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Anti-injunction Act]
In re A.L.C., 2014 WL 1571274 (C.D.Cal.) [Sweden] [Habitual Residence ] [Acquiescence] [Fundamental Freedoms] [Petition granted]
In re ALC, --- Fed.Appx. ----, Not for publication, 2015 WL 1742347 (C.A.9 (Cal.)) [Sweden] [Habitual Residence]
In re Application of Adams ex rel. Naik v. Naik, 363 F.Supp.2d 1025 ( N.D. Illinois, 2005)
In re B. Del C.S.B., 525 F. Supp.2d 1182 (C.D. California, 2008)
In re Bates, High Court of Justice, No. CA 122/89, Family Division, Royal Courts of Justice, London WC2, February 23, 1989
In re DD, 440 F.Supp.2d 1283 (M.D. Florida,2006)
In re Koc, 181 F.Supp.2d 136 (E. D.  N.Y. 2001) 
In re Morris, 55 F.Supp.2d 1156 (D. Colo. 1999)
In re One Infant Child, 2014 WL 704037 (S.D.N.Y.) [Singapore] [Attorney Fees and necessary expenses]
In re Polson, 578 F.Supp.2d 1064 (S. D. Ill. 2008)
In re Robinson, 983 F. Supp. 1339 (D. Colo. 1997)
Jakubik v Schmirer, 2013 WL 3465857 (S.D.N.Y.) [Hungary] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Intervention By Child Subject of Proceeding]
Jacksic v Serif, Not Reported in F.Supp.3d, 2014 WL 6685375 (D.Ariz.) [Serbia] [Rights of Custody] [Petition denied]
In re D.T.J., 2013 WL 3866636 (S.D.N.Y.) [Hungary] [Well Settled] [Age & Maturity] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Denied]
Jenkins v Jenkins, 569 F.3d 549 (6 Cir 2009)
Jensie v Jensie, 2012 WL 5178168 (E.D.Ky.) [Sweden] [Habitual Residence]
Johnson v Johnson, 2011 WL 569876 (S.D.N.Y.)
Journe v. Journe, 911 F. Supp. 43 (D. Puerto Rico, 1995)
Judge v Williams, 2011 WL 3100346 (E.D.N.C.)
Khan v. Fatima, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 1560398 (C.A.7 (Ill.)) [Canada] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies -Rule 52 -Duty to Make Findings of Fact]
Kijowska v. Haines, 463 F.3d 583 (C.A.7 (Ill.),2006)
Khalip v Khalip, 2011 WL 1882514 (E.D. Mich.)
Kanth v. Kanth, 79 F.Supp.2d 1317 (D. Utah 1999)
Karkkainen v Kovalchuk, 445 F.3d 280 (3rd Cir. (Pa.) 2006)
Karpenko v Leendertz, --- F.3d ----, 2010 WL 3326131 (3rd Cir. (Pa.) 2010)
Klam v. Klam, 797 F. Supp. 202 (E. D. N. Y. 1992) 
Koch v Koch, 416 F.Supp.2d 645 ( E. D. Wisconsin, 2006)
Koch v Koch, 450 F.3d 703 (7th Cir.,2006)
Krefter v Willis, 623 F.Supp.2d 125 (D. Mass. 2009)
Kufner v Kufner, 440 F.Supp.2d 491 (D. R. I., 2007)
Kufner v Kufner, 519 F.3d 533 (1st Cir. 2008)
Lachman v Lachman,  2008 WL 5054198 (E.D.N.Y.) [England] [Habitual Residence]
Laguna v Avila, 2008 WL 1986253 (E. D. N. Y.) [Colombia] [Video Link Testimony] [Wishes of Child]
Lakeman v Weed, 2011 WL 824588 (D.Minn.)
Langa v Langa, --- Fed.Appx. ----, 2014 WL 60110 (C.A.3 (N.J.))[South Africa] [Habitual Residence]

Lalo v. Malca, 318 F.Supp.2d 1152 (S.D., Florida, 2004)
Larbie v Larbie, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 3089773 (C.A.5 (Tex.) [United Kingdom] [Moot Appeal ][Consent and Acquiescence] [Habitual Residence]
Larrategui v. Laborde, 2014 WL 128048 (E.D.Cal.)[Argentina] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Denied]
Larrategui v Laborde, 2014 WL 2154477 (E.D.Cal.) [Argentina] [Fees and Costs] [Not clearly inappropriate]
Lawrence v. Lewis, Slip Copy, 2015 WL 1299285 (S.D.Ohio) [United Kingdom] [Temporary Restraining Order]
Leser v Berridge,--- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 6811035 (C.A.10 (Colo.)) [Czech Republic] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Moot]
Lieberman v Tabachnik, 625 F.Supp.2d 1109 (D. Colorado 2009)
Levesque v Levesque, 816 F. Supp. 662 (D. Kansas, 1993)
Locicero v. Lurashi, 321 F. Supp. 2d 295 (D. Puerto Rico, 2004)
Lockhart v Smith, 2011 WL 4402361 (D.Me.) [Canada] [Wishes of the Child]
Londano v Gonzalez, 2013 WL 1934043, (D. Massachusetts) [Colombia] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Temporary Restraining Order]
Londono v Gonzalez, 2013 WL 6093782 (D. Mass)  [Colombia] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
Lopez v. Alcala, 547 F.Supp.2d 1255 (M. D. Fla. 2008)
Lopez v Villareal, 2012 WL 458490 (D.Nev.)) [Mexico] [Consent or Acquiescence]
Lops v. Lops, 140 F.3d 927 (11th Cir. 1998)
In re Application of Lozano, 2011 WL 3667444 (S.D.N.Y.) [United Kingdom] [Well-Settled in New Environment]
Lozano v. Alvarez, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 4479007 (C.A.2 (N.Y.)) [United Kingdom] [Well-Settled Defense] [Equitable Tolling]
Luedtke v Luedtke Thomsen, 2012 WL 2562405 (S.D.Ind.) [Switzerland] [Habitual Residence]
Lutman v Lutman, 2010 WL 3398985 (M.D.Pa.) [Isreal] [Habitual Residence]
Ly v. Heu, 296 F.Supp.2d 1009 (D. Minn. 2003)
Lynch v Mendez Lynch, 220 F. Supp.2d 1347, ( M.D. Florida, 2002)
Lyon v Lyon, 2012 WL 1970363 (D.Kan.) [England] [Consent and Acquiescence]
Lyon v. Moreland-Lyon, 2012 WL 5384558 (D.Kan.) [England] [Attorneys Fees]
March v Levine, 136 F. Supp.2d 831, (M.D. Tennessee,2000)
March v. Levine, 249 F.3d 462 (6th Cir. 2001)
Marquez v Castillo, 2014 WL 5782812 (M.D.Fla.) [Mexico] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Temporary Restraining Order]
Marquez v Castillo, 2014 WL 6883134 ( M.D. Florida)  [Mexico] [Habitual Residence]
Matas-Vidal v. Libbey-Aguilera, 2013 WL 3995300 (D.Utah) [Mexico] [TRO Granted] [Well-Settled] [Age and Maturity] [Petition Denied]
Matovski v Matovski, 2007 WL 2600862 (S. D. N. Y., 2007) [Australia] [Well Settled In New Environment] [Wishes of the Child]
Matter of Leslie v. Noble, 377 F.Supp.2d 1232 (S.D. Florida, 2005)
Matter of Mahmoud, 1997 WL 43524 (E. D. N. Y.) [England] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies]
Matter of Mohsen, 715 F. Supp. 1063 (D. Wyo. 1989)
Matter of MG v WZ, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2014 WL 5026267 (N.Y.Fam.Ct.) [New York Family Court] [Dominican Republic] [Habitual Residence]
Matter of R.B v. K.G., 2014 WL 5347587 (Fam Ct, 2014) [New York Family Court] [Israel] [Well Settled] [Age and Maturity]
Matter of S.E.O. and Y.O., 2013 WL 4564746 (S.D.N.Y.)) [Turkey] [Costs and Expenses] [Clearly Inappropriate]
Matter of SLC, 2014 WL 2801053 (M.D.Fla.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Petition granted] 
Margain v Ruiz-Bours, Not for publication, 2015 WL 500685 (9th Cir., 2015) [Mexico] [Now Settled Defense]
Mauvais v Herissee, 2014 WL 1454452 (D.Mass.)) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition granted]
Mauvais v. Herisse, 2013 WL 6383930 (D.Mass.) [Canada] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Temporary Restraining Order]
Mauvis v Herisse, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 5659412 (C.A.1 (Mass.)[Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Granted]
Maxwell v Maxwell, 588 F.3d 245 (4th Cir.(N.C.) 2009)
Maynard v. Maynard, 484 F.Supp.2d 654,  (E .D. Mich., 2007)
McCurdy v Shreve-McCurdy, 2011 WL 1457158 (E.D.Mich.) [
Mckenzie v McKenzie, 168 F.Supp.2d 47 (2001)
Mendez v. May, --- F.3d ----2015 WL 627215 (1st Cir.,2015) [Argentina] [Habitual Residence]
Mendoza v. Pascual, 2015 WL 1880309 (S.D.Ga.) [Mexico] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Temporary Restraining Order]
Mendoza v Silva, 2014 WL 658068 (N.D.Iowa) [Mexico] [ Attorneys Fees] [Clearly inappropriate]
Mendoza v Silva, 2013 WL 6491479 (N.D.Iowa) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Consent or acquiescence] [video testimony] [Petition Granted] [Stay pending appeal denied]
Menechem v Menechem, 246 F.Supp.2d 437 (D. Md., 2003)
Meredith v. Meredith, 759 F. Supp. 1432, 1433 (D.Ariz.1991)
Mero v Prieto, 557 F.Supp.2d 357 (E.D.N.Y.)
In re Mikovic v Mikovic, 541 F.Supp.2d 1264 (M.D. Fla, 2007)
Miller v Miller, 240 F.3d 392, (4th Cir.,2001)
Miltiadous v Tetervak, 686 F.Supp.2d 544, 686 F.Supp.2d 544 ( E.D. Pennsylvania)
Montero-Garcia v. Montero, 2013 WL 6048992 (W.D.N.C.) [Dominican Republic] [Attorneys Fees]
Moura v Cunha, --- F.Supp.3d ----, 2014 WL 7251039 (D.Mass.) [Brazil] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition granted]
Mlynarski v. Pawezka, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 1150310 (D. Mass, 2013) [Poland] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Granted]
Morgan v. Morgan, 289 F.Supp.2d 1067 (N.D. Iowa 2003)
Morton v Morton, 982 F. Supp. 675 (D. Nebraska, 1997)
Mota v. Castillo, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 3330176 (C.A.2 (N.Y.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence]
Mozes v Mozes, 239 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir, 2001) 
Mezo v. Elmergawi, 855 F. Supp. 59 (E. D. N. Y. 1994)
Muhlemkamp v Blizzard, 521 F Supp 2d 1140 (E.D. Washington)
Mlynarski v. Pawezka, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 1150310 (D. Mass, 2013) [Poland] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Granted]
Munoz v. Rivera, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 563419 (W.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Granted]
Murphy v. Sloan, 2013 WL 4725120 (N.D. California) [Ireland] [Temporary Restraining Order] [No Security Required] [Deposit Passports]
Murphy v Sloan, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 4179961 (C.A.9 (Cal.)) [Ireland] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
Navani v Shahani, 496 F.3d 1121 (10th Cir., 2007)
Neergaard v Colon, 2014 WL 936691 (D.Mass.)[Singapore] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Granted]
Neergaard-Colon v Neergaard, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 2111307 (C.A.1 (Mass.)) [Singapore] [Habitual Residence] [Remanded]
Nelson v Petterle, 2011 WL 1048107 (E.D.Cal.) [
Neves v Neves, 637 F. Supp 2d 322 (W. D. North Carolina, 2009)
Nicolson v Pappalardo, 674 F.Supp.2d 295, (D. Maine, 2010)
Nicolson v Pappalardo, 605 F.3d 100 (1st Cir. (Me.))
Nixon v Nixon, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 7972481 (D.N.M.) [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Ngassa v Mpafe, 488 F.Supp.2d 514 (D. Maryland, 2007)
Norinder v Fuentes, --- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 3966153 (7th Cir.(Ill.))[Sweden] [Discovery] [Habitual Residence] [Attorneys Fees]
Norden-Powers v. Beveridge, 125 F.Supp.2d 634 (E. D. N. Y. 2000)
Nunez-Escudero v. Tice-Menley, 58 F.3d 374 (8th Cir.1995)
Oddy v Morris, 2012 WL 464227 (D.Hawaii) [United Kingdom] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Ohlander v. Larson, 114 F.3d 1531 (10th Cir.1997)
Ordon Ez v. Tacuri,  2009 WL 2928903 (E. D. N. Y. 2009) [Ecuador] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Video link Testimony]
Ortiz v Cantu, 2009 WL 8543610 (S.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Rights of custody] [Patria Postestas]
Ortiz v. Martinez, 2014 WL 1409446 (N.D.Ill.)  [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition denied]
Ostos v Vega, 2015 WL 569124 (N.D. Texas, Dallas Division) [Mexico] [Motion to dismiss] [Maintain Statues Quo] [Guardian Ad Litem] [Expedited Discovery]
Ozaltin v Ozaltin, 708 F.3d 355 (2d Cir. 2013) [Turkey] [Rights of Access] [Attorney Fees]
Ozaltin v Ozaltin, 2012 WL 2026443 (S.D.N.Y.) [Turkey] [Well-Settled] [Rights of access]
Ozgul v. Ozgul, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 3981238 (D.Colo.) [Germany] [Habitual Residence]
Panteleris v Panteleris, 2014 WL 3053211 (N.D.Ohio) [Australia] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of Custody] [Petition granted]
Panteleris v. Panteleris, --- Fed.Appx. ----, 2015 WL 468197(6th Cir., 2015) [Australia] [Habitual Residence]
Papakosmas v Papakosmas, 483 F.3d 617 (9th Cir.(Cal.) 2007)
Pasten v Velasquez, 462 F.Supp.2d 1206 (M.D. Alabama, 2006)
Patrick v. Rivera-Lopez, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 388053 (C.A.1 (Puerto Rico)) [Puerto Rico] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies - Bond] [Rights of Custody]
Patrick v. Rivera-Lopez, 2012 WL 5462677 (D.Puerto Rico) [England] [Rights of Custody]
Paulus ex rel. P.F.V. v. Cordero, 2013 WL 432769 (M.D.Pa.) [Dominican Republic] [Attorney Fees and Costs] [Pro Bono Counsel]
Paz v Paz, 169 F.Supp.2d 254 (S.D. New York, 2001)
Pesin v Osorio Rodriguez, 77 F.Supp.2d 1277 ( S.D. Florida, 1999) 
Pesin v. Rodriguez, 244 F.3d 1250 (11th Cir. 2001)

People ex rel. Ron v. Levi, 719 N.Y.S.2d 365 (App. Div. 2001)
Philippopoulos, v. Philippopoulou, 461 F.Supp.2d 1321 ( N.D. Georgia, 2006)
Pielage v McConnell, 516 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2008)
Pignoloni v Gallagher, 2014 WL 642596 (2d Cir 2014) [Italy] [Consent] [Petition denied]
Pignoloni v Gallagher, Slip Copy, 2012 WL 5904440 (E.D.N.Y.) [Italy] [Consent]
Pliego v Hayes, 2014 WL 6674560 (W.D.Ky.)[Turkey] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Expert Testimony][Privilege]
Pliego v. Hayes, 2015 WL 1893426 (W.D.Ky.) [Turkey] [Costs and Expenses]
Ponce v Sanchez, 2011 WL 6820332 (D.Colo.) [Mexico] [Attorney Fees]
Prevot v Prevot , 59 F.3d 556 (6th Cir, 1995)
Prouse v. Thoreson, 2012 WL 5199182 (W.D.Wis.) [Italy] [Habitual Residence]
Radu v Toader, 2011 WL 3418368 (E.D.N.Y.)
Radu v Toder, 2012 WL 556174 (C.A.2 (N.Y.) [Romania] [Rights of Custody]

Raijmakers-Eghaghe v. Haro, 131 F.Supp.2d 953 (E. D. Mich. 2001)
Ramirez v Buyauskas, 2012 WL 606746 (E.D.Pa.) [Mexico] ["Patria potestas'] [Well-settled in New Environment] [Wishes of the Child]
Rana v Multani, Slip Copy, 2015 WL 2330163 (S.D.N.Y.) [Canada] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies]
Redmond v Redmond, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 3821595 (C.A.7 (Ill.))[Ireland] [Habitual Residence]
Rehder v Rehder, 2014 WL 6982530 ( W.D. Wash) [Germany] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of Custody] [Petition granted]
Reyes v Jeffcoat, 2012 WL 4009641 (D.S.C.) [Venezuela] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Evidence]
Rial v Rijo, 2010 WL 1643995 (S. D. N. Y.) [Spain] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Rigby v Damant, 486 F.Supp.2d 222 (D. Mass. 2009)
Rigby v Damant, 486 F.3d 692 (1st Cir. 2007)

Rivera Rivas v. Segovia, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 5394778 (W.D.Ark.) [El Salvador] [Well-Settled in New Environment]
Robert v Tesson, 507 F.3d 981 (6th Cir., 2008)
Roche v Hartz, 2011 WL 841556 (N.D.Ohio)
Rodriguez v. Sieler, 2012 WL 5430369 (D.Mont.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 20]
Romero-Mejia v. Ivers, 2013 WL 1412237 (E.D.Wash.) [Mexico] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies ][Temporary Restraining Order]
Rovirosa v. Paetau, 2012 WL 6087481 (S.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Patria Postestas]
Rowe v Vargason, 2011 WL 4529341 (D. Minn.) [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Well Settled in New Environment] [Conditional order]
Rowe v Vargason, 2011 WL 6151523 (D.Minn.) [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Australia]

Roy v Roy, 432 F.Supp.2d 1297 (S.D. Florida, 2006) affirmed sub nom Hanley v Roy , supra.
R.S. v. D.O., 2012 WL 874833 (N.Y.Sup.) [Italy] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies]
Rydder v Rydder, 49 F.3d 369 (8th Cir.,1995)
Saldivar v Rodela, 2012 WL 2914833 (W.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of custody] [Consent]
Salvidar v Rodella, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 4497507 (W.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Attorneys Fees]
Salinier v. Moore, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 3515699 (D.Colo.) [France] [Attorneys Fees and Costs]
Salazar v Maimon, 2014 WL 1688197 (5th Cir., 2014) [Venezuela] [Attorneys Fees and Necessary Expenses]
San Martin v. Moquillaza, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2014 WL 3924646 (E.D.Tex.) [Peru] [Habitual Residence] [Petition granted]
Sanchez-Londono v. Gonzalez, 752 F.3d 533 (1st Cir., 2014) [Colombia] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
Sanchez v. R.G.L.,--- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 684606 (C.A.5 (Tex.)) [Mexico] [Proper Respondent] [Child’s Right to Appeal] [Guardian ad litem] [Effect of asylum pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1158. ]
Sanchez v Sanchez, 2012 WL 3204183 (W.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Well-Settled] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies]
Sasson v. Sasson, 327 F.Supp.2d 489 (D. New Jersey, 2004)
Sealed Appellant v Sealed Appellee 394 F.3d 338 (5th Cir. (Tex.) 2004)
Sealed Appellee v Sealed Appellant, --- Fed.Appx. ----, 2014 WL 3585835 (C.A.5 (Tex.))[Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Granted]
Seaman v Patterson, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 124223 (M.D.Ga.)
Seaman v. Peterson, 2014 WL 4377582, --- F.3d ---- (11th Cir., 2014) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Petition granted]
Selo v. Selo, 2013 WL 878959 (E.D.Mich.) [Switzerland] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
Shalit v. Coppe, 182 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir., 1999)
Shealy v. Shealy, 295 F.3d 1117 (10th Cir., 2002)
Sheikh v. Cahill, 145 Misc. 2d 171, 546 N.Y.S.2d 517 (Sup. Ct. 1989)
Silverman v. Silverman, 267 F.3d 788 (8th Cir. 2001)
Silverman v Silverman, 338 F.3d 886 (8th Cir, 2003)
Silvestri v Oliva, 403 F.Supp.2d 378 ( D. New Jersey, 2005)
Singh v Pierpont, 2014 WL 6471374 (D. Hawaii) [Canada] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Res Judicata]
Simcox v Simcox, 511 F.3d 594 (C.A.6 (Ohio))
Skolnick v Wainer, 2013 WL 6732656 (D.Conn.) [Singapore] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Motion to Dismiss] [Consent or acquiescence]
Skolnick v. Wainer, 2013 WL 5329112 (E.D.N.Y.)) [Singapore] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Jurisdiction][Venue]
Slagenweit v. Slagenweit, 841 F. Supp. 264 (N.D. Iowa 1993), dismissed, 43 F.3d 1476 and dismissed, 43 F.3d 1476.
Slight v. Noonkester, 2014 WL 282642 (D.Mont.) [Ireland] [Wrongful Retention] [Chasing order] [Well-Settled] [Petition Denied]
Smedley v Smedley, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 5647426 (C.A.4 (N.C.) [Germany] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Comity] [Petition Granted]
Souratgar v Fair, 2012 WL 6700214 (S.D. N.Y., 2012) [Singapore] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Souratgar v. Fair, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 2631375 (C.A.2 (N.Y.))[Singapore] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Fundamental Freedoms]
Sorenson v Sorenson, 559 F.3d 871 (8th Cir 2009)
State ex rel Geiser v Valentine, 11/16/2007 NYLJ 30, (col. 3) (Sup. Ct, Richmond Co., Minardo, J.) 

Steffen F. v. Severina P., 966 F.Supp.2d 922 (E. Ariz. 1997)
Stern v Stern, --- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 1706912 (8th Cir.(Iowa))
Stirzaker v. Beltran, 2010 WL 1418388 (D.Idaho) [Mexico][Rights of Custody][Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 20]
Suarez v Castrillo, 2011 WL 2669198 (D.Colo.)
Tavares v Morales, 2014 WL 2038318 (S.D.N.Y.) [Spain] [Now Settled] [Petition Denied]
Taveras v. Taveras,  397 F. Supp. 908, (S.D. Ohio, 2005)
Tavaras v Tavaras, 477 F. 3d 767 (6th Cir., 2006)
Taveras ex rel. L.A.H. v. Morales, --- Fed.Appx. ----, 2015 WL 2263023 (C.A.2 (N.Y.)) (summary order) [Spain] [Now Settled]
Taylor v Hunt, 2013 WL 620934 (E.D.Tex.) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Guardian Ad Litem] [Guardian Fees] [Petition Granted]
Taylor v Taylor, 2012 WL 6631395 (C.A.11 (Fla.)) [United Kingdom] [Grave Risk of Harm] 
Teijeiro Fernandez v. Yeager, 121 F.Supp.2d 1118 (W. D. Mich. 2000)
Tenorio Ruiz v Tenorio, 392 F.3d 1247 (11th Cir.)
Thomson v Gnirk, 2012 WL 3598854 (D.N.H.) [Canada] [Habitual Residence]
Tlustochowicz v. Tlustochowicz, 2012 WL 3779071 (N.D.Ill.) [Poland] [Article 15] [Habitual Residence]
Toren v. Toren, 191 F.3d 23 (1st Cir. 1999)
Trundig v Trundig, 686 F.Supp.2d 570 ( M.D. North Carolina, 2010) 
Tsarbopoulos v Tsarbopoulos, 176 F.Supp.2d 1045 (E. D. Washington, 2001)
Tucker v Ellenby, 2011 WL 5361154 (S.D.Fla.) [Belize] [Yunger and Colorado River Abstention]
Uzoh v Uzoh, 2012 WL 1565345 (N.D.Ill.)) [England] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Unclean hands]
Vale v. Avila, 2008 U.S. App. Lexis 17068 (7 Cir. 2008)
Valenzuela v Michel, 2013 WL 6038240 (9th Cir., 2013) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence]
Van De Sande v. Van De Sande, 431 F.3d 567 (7th Cir., 2005)
Van Driessche v. Ohio-Esezeoboh, 466 F.Supp.2d 828 (S.D. Tex.,2006)
Vasconcelos v. Batista, 2013 WL 600200 (C.A.5 (Tex.)) [Brazil] [Age and Maturity]
Vasquez v Colores,--- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 3366380 (8th Cir.(Minn.)
Vasquez v Estrada, 2011 WL 196164 (N.D.Tex.) [Mexico][Grave Risk of Harm]
Velasquez v Green, 2012 WL 2885662 (E.D.Tex.)) [Canada] [Well-Settled in New Environment] [Age and Maturity]
Velasquez v Velasquez, 2014 WL 7272934 (E.D.Va.) [El Salvador] [Provisional Remedies] [Temporary Restraining order]
Velasquez v. Funes de Velasquez, 2015 WL 1565142 [E.D. Virginia ] [El Salvador] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Vasquez v Vasquez, 2013 WL 7045041 (N.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Consent] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Denied]
Vilchis v. Hall, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2014 WL 2978378 (N.D.Ill.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
Viteri v Pflucker, 550 F.Supp.2d 829 (ND Illinois 2008)
Von Kennel Gaudin v. Remis, 282 F.3d 1178 (9th Cir. 2002)
Vujicevic v. Vujicevic, 2013 WL 2627132 (W.D.Wash.) [Croatia] [Age & Maturity] [Petition Denied]
Vujicevic v Vujicevic, 2012 WL 4948640 (S.D.N.Y.) [Croatia] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Notice & Opportunity to Be Heard]
Vujicevic v Vujicevic, 2012 WL 5896766 (S.D.N.Y.) [Croatia] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] Service of Process]
Walker v. Kitt, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 5237262 (N.D.Ill.) [Israel] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 20]
Walker v Walker, 2013 WL 1110876 (N.D.Ill.) [Australia] [Habitual Residence] [Age & Maturity] [Petition Granted]
Walker v Walker, 2012 WL 5668330 (C.A.7 (Ill.) [Australia] [Habitual Residence] [Consent]
Walker v Walker, 2011 WL 5008533 (N.D.Ill.) [Australia] [Habitual Residence] [Abandonment and Consent]
In re Walsh, 31 F.Supp.2d 200 (D. Mass. 1998)
In re Walsh, 53 F.Supp.2d 91 (D. Mass. 1999)  
Walsh v. Walsh, 221 F.3d 204 (1st Cir. 2000)
Walton v. Walton, 925 F. Supp. 453 (S.D. Miss., 1996)
Wanninger v. Wanninger, 850 F. Supp. 78 (D. Mass, 1994)
West v Dobrev, 2013 WL 5813749 (10th Cir, 2013) [France] [Belgium] [Summary Determination] 
Whallon v. Lynn, 230, F.3d 450 (1st Cir. (Mass.) 2000)
Whallon v. Lynn, 356 F.3d 138 (1st Cir.,2004)
White v White, 2012 WL 3041660 (S.D.N.Y.)  [Germany] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Rooker-Feldman Doctrine] [Res Judicata] [Collateral Estoppel][Failure to State a Claim]
White v. White, 556 Fed. Appx. 10 (2d Cir., 2014) [Fed & State Judicial Remedies] [Petition Denied]
White v White, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 2284877 (C.A.4 (Va.)) [Switzerland] [Rights of Custody]
White v White, 893 F.Supp.2d 755 (E.D. Va, 2013) [Switzerland] [Attorneys Fees and Costs]
Whiting v Krassner, 391 F.3d 540 ( 3rd Cir, 2004)
Wiezel v. Wiezel-Tyranauer, 385 F.Supp.2d 240 (S. D. N. Y., 2005)
Wiggill v Janicki, 262 F.Supp.2d 687 ( S.D. West Virginia, 2003)
Witherspoon v Orange County Dept. of Social Services, 646 F. Supp 2d 1176, (C.D. California, 2009)
Wood v Wood, 2013 WL 1907492, (E. D. Washington) [United Kingdom] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies ][Temporary Restraining Order] [Deposit Passport with Court]
Wojcik v. Wojcik, 959 F.Supp.2d 413 (ED. Mich. 1997)
Yaman v. Yaman, 2013 WL 322204 (D.N.H.) [Turkey] [Well-Settled] [Equitable Tolling]
Yaman v. Yaman, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 4827587 (C.A.1 (N.H.)) [Turkey] [Now Settled] [Equitable Tolling] [Article 18] [Guardian Ad Litem] [Petition Denied]
Yang v Tsui, 416 F.3d 199 (3d Cir.,2005)
Yang v Tsui, 499 F.3d 259 (3d Cir., 2007)
Zajaczkowski v. Zajaczkowska, 932 F. Supp. 128 (D. Maryland) 
Zuker v. Andrews, 2 F.Supp.2d 134 (D. Mass. 1998)

 
 Reported Federal Hague Convention Cases and New York State Hague Convention cases are organized by name, citation, subject matter and country, with comprehensive summaries of each individual case.        
                       

 Unreported Federal Cases decided under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction are listed in a separate Alphabetical table of cases. They are organized by name, citation, subject matter and country, and have either comprehensive summaries or slip copies of each opinion.    

 

Library of All Reported Hague Convention Cases Arranged Alphabetically - Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction
 Go to Library of All Reported Hague Convention Cases and Citations - Arranged By Country and Subject Matter


A.A.M. v. J.L.R.C.,--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 75049 (E.D.N.Y.) [Mexico] [Rights of Custody] [Patria Potestas]
Abbott v Abbott, --- S.Ct. ----, 2010 WL 1946730
Abbott v Abbott, 495 F.Supp.2d 635 (W.D. Texas, 2007)
Abbott v Abbott, 542 F.3d 1081 (5th Cir. 2008)
Acosta v Acosta, 2012 WL 2178982 (D.Minn.) [Peru] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Acosta v Acosta,--- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 3970239 (C.A.8 (Minn.)) [Peru][Grave Risk of Harm] [Expert opinion]
Aguilera v. De Lara, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2014 WL 3427548 (D.Ariz.)[Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition granted]
Aguilera v. De Lara, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2014 WL 4204947 (D.Ariz.) [Mexico] [Necessary Expenses]
Aguirre v Calle, 2008 WL 4461931 (E. D. N. Y.) [Colombia] [Default] [Rights of Custody]
Alcala v Hernandez, 2014 WL 5506739 (D.S.C.) [Mexico] [Provisional Remedies] [Temporary Restraining Order] [Judicial Notice]
Alcala v. Hernandez, 2015 WL 1893291 (D.S.C.) [Mexico] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Testimony by Video]
Aldinger v Segler,  157 Fed. Appx. 317 (1st Cir.,2005) [Attorneys Fees & Costs]

Application of Adan, 437 F.3d 381 (3rd Cir. 2006)
Application of Falls v. Downe, 871 F. Supp. 100 (D. Mass., 1994)
Application of Inna Kharlamova v. Roach, 2014 WL 4983837 (WD, Washington) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Petition granted]
Application of Ponath, 829 F. Supp. 363, 367 (D. Utah 1993)
Application of Stead v Menduno, Not Reported in F.Supp.3d, 2014 WL 6819547 (D.Colo.)  [ New Zealand] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Expert Testimony]
Anderson v. Acree, 250 F.Supp.2d 876 (S.D. Ohio 2002)
Aldinger v. Segler, 263 F.Supp.2d 284 (D. Puerto Rico)
Aly v. Aden, 2013 WL 593420 (D. Mn) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Attorneys Fees & Costs Clearly Inappropriate] [Petition Granted]
Antunez-Fernandes v. Connors-Fernandes, 259 F.Supp.2d 800 (N. D. Iowa 2003)
Aranda v Serna, 2013 WL 665064 (M.D.Tenn.) [Mexico] [Well Settled ][Age and Maturity] [Petition Denied]
Arboleda v. Arenas, 311 F.Supp.2d 336 (E. D. N. Y., 2004)
 

Armiliato v. Zaric-Armiliato, 169 F.Supp.2d 230 (S. D. N. Y. 2001)
Arulpragasam v. Bronfman, 2013 WL 2249256 (E.D.N.Y.) [England] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Use of Pseudonyms in Civil Litigation]
Asvesta v Petroutsas, 580 F.3d 1000 (9th Cir 2009)
Avendano v Smith, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 3702401 (D.N.M.)  [Mexico] [Rights of Custody] [Patria potestas] [Grave Risk of Harm ] [Attorneys fees]
Avila v. Morales, 2013 WL 5499806 (D.Colo.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Telephone appearance]
Bader v Kramer, 445 F.3d 346 (4th Cir., 2006) ("Bader I")
Bader v Kramer, 484 F.3d 666 (4th Cir., 2007)
Baran v Beaty,  479 F.Supp.2d 1257 (S.D. Alabama, 2007)
Baran v Beaty, 526 F.3d 1340 (11th Cir. (Ala.))
Barr v Barr, 2011 WL 797664 (S.D.Tex.) [United Kingdom]
Barzilay v Barzilay, 536 F.3d 844 (8th Cir. 2008)
Barzilay v Barzilay, 600 F.3d 912 (8th Cir 2010)
Baxter v. Baxter, 324 F.Supp.2d 536 (D. Delaware, 2004) 

Baxter v. Baxter, 423 F.3d  363  (3rd Cir., 2005)

Bedder v Bedder, 2013 WL 504022 (S.D.Ohio) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Granted]
Bekier v. Bekier, 248 F.3d 1051 (11th Cir. 2001) 

Belay v Getachew, 272 F.Supp.2d 553,(D. Md. 2003)
Buenaver v Vasquez, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2014 WL 3058250 (E.D.N.Y.) [Colombia] [Now Settled] [Petition Granted]
Berendsen v Nichols, 938 F.Supp. 737 (D. Kan., 1996)
Berezowsky v. Ojeda, 2013 WL 150714 (S.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of Custody] [Deposit Passport] [Petition Granted]
Berezowsky v Ojeda, 2014 WL 4216286 (5th Cir, 2014) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [No Habitual Residence]
Bernal v. Gonzalez,--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 7113186 (W.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of Custody] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 16 & 17] [Petition Granted]
Biel v. Bekmukhamedova, --- F.Supp.2d ---- 2013 WL 4574161 (E.D. Louisiana.) [Luxembourg] [Younger and Colorado River Abstention]
Blanc v Morgan, 721 F.Supp.2d 749 (WD Tenn 2010)
Blondin v. Dubois, 19 F. Supp. 2d 123 (S. D. N. Y. 1998), judgment vacated, 189 F.3d 240 (2d Cir. 1999) 78 F. Supp. 2d 283, 288-93 (S. D. N. Y. 2000) ("Blondin III"), 238 F.3d 153 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) 2001) ("Blondin IV")
Bobadilla v Cordero, 2014 WL 3869998 (M.D.N.C.) Mexico] [Now Settled] [Discretion to Order Return] [Petition granted]
Bocquet v Ouzid, 225 F.Supp.2d 1337 (2003)
Boehm v Boehm, 2011 WL 863066 (M.D.Fla.)
Bowen v. Bowen, 2014 WL 2154905 (W.D.Pa.) [Northern Ireland] [Habitual Residence] [Consent] [Wishes of Child] [Petition denied]
Brennan v. Cibault, 227 A.D.2d 965, 643 N.Y.S.2d 780 (4th Dept 1996)
Broca v. Giron, 2012 WL 7660123 (E.D.N.Y.)  [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Age and Maturity]
Broca v Giron,--- Fed.Appx. ----, 2013 WL 3745985 (C.A.2 (N.Y.)) [Mexico] [Well-Settled]
Broda v Abarca, 2011 WL 900983 (D.Colo.)
Brooke v Willis, 907 F. Supp. 57 (S.D. N. Y. 1995)
Bromley v Bromley, 30 F.Supp.2d 857 (E. D. Pennsylvania, 1988)
Brosselin v Harless, 2011 WL 6130419 (W.D.Wash.) [Habitual Residence] [France]
Burch v Burch, 2013 WL 1909472 (S.D.Ind.) [Finland] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of Custody] [Petition Granted]
Bustamente v Serrano-Figueroa, 207 F.Supp.2d 1205 (D. Colorado,, 2002)
Cabrera v. Lozano, 323 F.Supp.2d 1303 (S.D. Florida, 2004)
Cantor v Cohen, 442 F.3d 196 (4th Cir. 2006)
Caro v Sanchez, 2013 WL 5300671 (D.N.J.) [Spain] [Consent] [Petition Denied]
Carnelli v Pas, 2011 WL 1983360 (D.N.J.)
Carranco v Munoz, 2013 WL 150760 (D.N.J.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Granted]
Carrasco v. Carrillo-Castro, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 1948996 (D.N.M.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence]
Carrascosa v Mcguire, 520 F.3d 249 (3d Cir. 2008)
Carvajal v. Chavarria,--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 6442704 (D.Conn.) [Costa Rica] [Rights of Custody] [Consent ] [Grave risk of harm] [Petition Granted]
Cascio v Pace, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2014 WL 197724 (N.D.Ill.) [Italy] [Rights of Custody] [Public Service Org] [Consent] [well settled] [Petition denied]
Castillo v Castillo, 597 F.Supp.2d 432 (D. Delaware, 2009)
Castro v  Martinez, 2012 WL 359901 (W.D.Tex.)) [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 20]
Cuellar v Joyce, 596 F.3d 505 (9th Cir. (Mont.))
Cuellar v Joyce, 603 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir 2010) 

Cerit v. Cerit, 188 F.Supp.2d 1239 (D.Haw.2002)
Chafin v Chafin, --- S.Ct. ----, 2013 WL 598436 (U.S.) [Scotland][ Federal & State Judicial Remedies - Appeals - Mootness]
Charalambous v Charalambous, --- F.3d ----, 2010 WL 4963063 (1st Cir.(Me.))
Charalambous v Charalambous, 744 F.Supp.2d 375 (D. Maine 2010)
Charalambous v Charalambous, 744 F.Supp.2d 379 (D. Maine 2010)
Choi v. Kim, 404 F. Supp. 495 (S. D. N. Y., 2005)
Copeland v Copeland, 134 F3d 362 (4th Cir., 1998)
Croll v. Croll, 229 F.3d 133 (2d Cir.2000)
Culculoglu v Culculoglu, 2013 WL 4045905 (D.Nev.)) [Canada] [Consent or Acquiescence] [Petition Denied]
Culculoglu v Culculoglu, 2013 WL 1413231 (D.Nev.) [Canada] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Temporary Restraining Order Granted] [Delivery of Passport to Court]

Currier v. Currier, 845 F. Supp. 916 (D.N.H.1994)
Dalsgaard v Montoya, 2011 WL 5037223 (M.D.Fla.) [Denmark] [Habitual Residence] [Wishes of the child defense]

Danipour v. McLarey, 286 F.3d 1 (1st Cir., 2002)
Darin v. Olivero-Huffman, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 1053775 (C.A.1 (Puerto Rico)) [Argentina] [Habitual Residence] [Consent] [Acquiescence] [Petition granted]
Darin v. Olivero-Huffman, 2012 WL 3542514 (D. Puerto Rico) [Argentina] [Habitual Residence] [Consent]
Daunis v. Daunis, 222 Fed.Appx. 32 (2d Cir., 2007) [Italy] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
David B. v. Helen O., 164 Misc. 2d 566, 625 N.Y.S.2d 436 (Fam. Ct. 1995) 

David S. v. Zamira S., 151 Misc. 2d 630, 574 N.Y.S.2d 429 (Fam. Ct. 1991)
Dawson v McPherson, 2014 WL 4748512 (M.D.N.C.) [United Kingdom] [Necessary Costs]
De La Vera v Holguin, 2014 WL 4979854 (D. NJ) [Spain] [Habitual Residence] [Petition granted]
Deloyve v Lee, 329 F.3d 330 (3rd Cir.,2003)
Demaj v Sakaj, 2012 WL 476168 (D.Conn.) [Italy] [Discovery]
Demaj v. Sakaj, 2012 WL 3822015 (D.Conn.) [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Evidence of Parental Alienation]
DeSilva v Pitts, 481 F.3d 1279 (10th Cir.2007)
De Vasconcelos v De Paula Batista, 2011 WL 806096 (E.D.Tex.)
Di Guiseppe v DiGuiseppe, 2008 WL 1743079 (E.D. Michigan) [Canada] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Age and Maturity]
Diabo v Delisle, 500 F.Supp.2d 159 (N.D. New York, 2007) 
 
Didur v Viger, 392 F.Supp.2d 1268 (D. Kansas, 2005) 

Didur v Viger, (10th Cir. 2006) No. 05-3440 D.C. No. 05-CV-2188-
JWL)

Diorinou v. Mezitis, 237 F.3d 133 (2d Cir., 2001)
Distler v Distler, 26 F.Supp.2d 723 (D. New Jersey, 1998)
Doudle v. Gause, 282 F.Supp.2d 922 (N. D. Ind. 2003)
Duarte v Bardales, 526 F.3d 563 (9th Cir. 2008)
Duran v Beaumont, 534 F.3d 142 (2nd Cir. (N.Y.))
Duran v Beaumont, 130 S Ct 3318, 176 L Ed 2d 1216 [2010] [Chile] [Rights of Custody]
East Sussex Children Services v. Morris, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 243403 (N.D.W.Va.) [United Kingdom] [Rights of Custody] [Deposit Passport] [Petition Granted]
Ebanks v Ebanks, 2007 WL 2591196 (S.D.N.Y.) [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Service of process]
E.D.T. ex rel. Adamah v. Tayson, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 4116666 (E.D.N.Y.) [United Kingdom] [Attorneys fees and Costs]
Edoho v Edoho, 2010 WL 3257480, (S.D. Texas, 2010) [Bahamas] [Well-Settled in New Environment]
Egervary v. Rooney, 80 F.Supp.2d 491 (E. D. Pa. 2000)
Elyashiv v. Elyashiv, 353 F.Supp.2d 394 (E.D.N.Y., 2005)
England v. England, 234 F.3d 268 (5th Cir. 2000)
Ermini v Vittori, 2013 WL 1703590 (S.D.N.Y.) [Italy] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Ermani v Vittori, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 3056360 (C.A.2) [Italy] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Denied]
Escaf v. Rodriquez, 191 F. Supp. 2d 685 (E. D. Va. 2002)
Estrada v. Salas-Perez, 2012 WL 4503147 (N.D.Ill.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm
Etienne v. Zuniga, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 4918791 (W.D.Wash.) [Mexico][Well-Settled in New Environment]
Fabri v. Pritikin-Fabri, 221 F. Supp. 2d 859 (N.D. Ill. 2001)
Falk v Sinclair, 692 F.Supp.2d 147 (D. Maine., 2010)

Fawcett v McRoberts, 326 F.3d 491 (4th Cir.,2003)
Feder v. Evans-Feder, 63 F.3d 217 (3d Cir.1995)
Felder v. Ponder, 2012 WL 3128570 (D.Mass.) [Switzerland] [Rights of Custody]
Felder v. Wetzel, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 4465591 (C.A.1 (Mass.)) [Switzerland] [Rights of Custody]
Fernandez-Trejo v. Alvarez-Hernandez, 2012 WL 6106418 (M.D.Fla.) [Mexico] [Rights of Custody] [Equitable Tolling] [Well-Settled]
Fernandez v. Somaru, 2012 WL 3553779 (M.D.Fla.) [Costa Rica] [Habitual Residence]
Filipczak v Filipczak, 2013 WL 692694 (2d Cir 2013)  [Poland] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Well Settled]
Flynn v. Borders, 472 F.Supp.2d 906 ( E.D. Ky. 2007)
Font Paulus ex rel. P.F.V. v. Vittini Cordero, 2012 WL 2524772 (M.D.Pa.) [Dominican Republic] [Well Settled in New Environment] [Wishes of the Child]
Foster v Foster, 654 F. Supp 2d 348 (W. D. Pennsylvania, 2009)
Fridlund v Spychaj-Fridlund, 654 F. Supp 2d 634, ( E.D. Kentucky, 2009)
Friedrich v. Friedrich, 983 F.2d 1396 (6th Cir. 1993)

Friedrich v. Friedrich, 78 F.3d 1060 (6th Cir. 1996)
Freier v. Freier,  969 F. Supp. 436, 443 (E.D.Mich.1996)
Furnes v Reeves, 362 F.3d 702 (11th Cir., 2004)
Garcia v Angarita, 440 F.Supp.2d 1364 (S.D. Florida, 2006)
Application of Garcia v Varona--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 3805778 (N.D.Ga.) [Spain] [Rights of custody] [Patria potestas ] [Consent] [Abandonment]
Gallagher v. Gallagher, --- F.Supp.3d ----, 2014 WL 7251039 (D.Mass.) [Ireland] [Consent] [Petition granted]
Gaudin v. Remis, 379 F.3d 631 (9th Cir. (Hawaii) Mar 11, 2002)
Application of Gavia v Hernandez, 2013 WL 6115725 (D. Utah) [Mexico] [Guardian ad litem] [Well-Settled] [Age and Maturity] [Petition Denied]
Gwiazdowski v. Gwiazdowska, 2015 WL 1514436 (E.D.N.Y.) [Poland] [Well settled defense]
Gallardo v. Orozco, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 3803905 (W.D.Tex) {Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Patria Potestad] [Petition Granted]
Gee v Hendroffe, 2014 WL 60325 (D.Nev.) [South Africa] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [42 U.S.C. § 11603(b)]["Located"]
Gee v Hendroffe, 2013 WL 5375294 (D.Nev.)  [South Africa] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Jurisdiction] [Venue]
Gee v. Hendroffe, 2015 WL 2151885 (S.D.Tex.) [South Africa] [Costs and Expenses]
Giampaolo v. Erneta, 390 F.Supp.2d 1269 (N.D. Georgia, 2004)
Gil v. Rodriguez 184 F.Supp.2d 1221, (M.D. Florida, 2002)
Giles v Bravo, 2012 WL 704745 (D. Nev.) [Mexico] [Well Settled in New Environment] [Acquiescence]
Gitter v Gitter,  2003 WL 22775375 (E. D. N. Y. 2003) [Habitual Residence]
Gitter v. Gitter, 396 F.3d 124 (2nd Cir.,2005)
Gonzalez v. Gutierrez, 311 F.3d 942 (9th Cir. 2002)
Gonzalez-Caballero v. Mena, 251 F.3d 789 (9th Cir. (Ariz.) 2001)
Green v Green, N.Y.L.J., 7-6-93, P.33, Col. 2, Sup. Ct., Kings Co. (Rigler, J.)
Grieve v. Tamerin, 269 F.3d 149 (2d Cir. 2001)
Guzzo v Cristofano, 2011 WL 6934108 (S.D.N.Y.)[Italy] [Habitual Residence]
Guzzo v. Cristofano, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 2476835 (C.A.2 (N.Y.))  [Italy] [Habitual Residence]
Haimdas v Haimdas, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2010 WL 2342377 (E.D.N.Y.) 
Habrzyk v Habrzyk, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 1331674 (N.D.Ill.)
Hamprecht v Hamprecht, 2013 WL 1155675 (M.D.Fla.) [Germany] [ Attorney's Fees and Costs]
Hamprecht v Hamprecht, 2012 WL 1367534 (M.D.Fla.) [Germany] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies]
Hamprecht v Hamprecht, 2012 WL 1890857 (M.D.Fla.) [Germany ] [Habitual Residence]
Haruno v Haruno, 2013 WL 5663070 (D.Nev.) [New Zealand] [Habitual Residence] [Consent]
Hazbun Escaf v. Rodriquez, 200 F.Supp.2d 603 (E. D. Va. 2002)
Hanley v Roy , 485 F.3d 641 (11th Cir. (Fla.) 2007)
Haylock v. Ebanks, 2013 WL 5410463 (E.D.La.) [Honduras] Necessary Costs and Expenses]
Headifen v. Harker, 2013 WL 2538897 (W.D.Tex.) [New Zealand] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
Hirst v. Tiberghien, 2013 WL 6827813 (D.S.C.) [United Kingdom] [Attorney's Fees]
Hirst v. Tiberghien, 2013 WL 1867343 (D.S.C.) United Kingdom] [Age & Maturity] [Guardian] [Visitation] [Petition Granted]
Hirst v Tiberhagien, 2014 WL 3687425 (D.S.C.) [United Kingdom] [Necessary Expenses] [ Motion to Reconsider Denied]
Hofmann v Sender,--- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 1955846 (C.A.2) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Consent or Acquiesence]
Holder v. Holder, 305 F.3d 854 (9th Cir., 2002)
Holder v Holder, 392 F.3d 1009 (9th Cir. 2004)
Hollis v O’ Driscoll, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 43890 (C.A.2 (N.Y.) [New Zealand] [Habitual Residence] [Costs]
Holmes v Holmes, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 3610218 (E.D.Mich.) [Ireland] [Habitual Residence]
Hynes v. Berger, 2012 WL 4889854 (D.Md.) [Germany] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Denial of Notice and Opportunity to be Heard]
Ibarra v Quintanilla Garcia, 476 F.Supp.2d 630 (S. D. Texas, 2007)
In re A.A.S., 2014 WL 840010 (S.D.N.Y.)[Dominican Republic] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Anti-injunction Act]
In re A.L.C., 2014 WL 1571274 (C.D.Cal.) [Sweden] [Habitual Residence ] [Acquiescence] [Fundamental Freedoms] [Petition granted]
In re ALC, --- Fed.Appx. ----, Not for publication, 2015 WL 1742347 (C.A.9 (Cal.)) [Sweden] [Habitual Residence]
In re Application of Adams ex rel. Naik v. Naik, 363 F.Supp.2d 1025 ( N.D. Illinois, 2005)
In re B. Del C.S.B., 525 F. Supp.2d 1182 (C.D. California, 2008)
In re Bates, High Court of Justice, No. CA 122/89, Family Division, Royal Courts of Justice, London WC2, February 23, 1989
In re DD, 440 F.Supp.2d 1283 (M.D. Florida,2006)
In re Koc, 181 F.Supp.2d 136 (E. D.  N.Y. 2001) 

In re Morris, 55 F.Supp.2d 1156 (D. Colo. 1999)
In re One Infant Child, 2014 WL 704037 (S.D.N.Y.) [Singapore] [Attorney Fees and necessary expenses]
In re Polson, 578 F.Supp.2d 1064 (S. D. Ill. 2008)

In re Robinson, 983 F. Supp. 1339 (D. Colo. 1997)
Jakubik v Schmirer, 2013 WL 3465857 (S.D.N.Y.) [Hungary] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Intervention By Child Subject of Proceeding]
Jacksic v Serif, Not Reported in F.Supp.3d, 2014 WL 6685375 (D.Ariz.) [Serbia] [Rights of Custody] [Petition denied]
In re D.T.J., 2013 WL 3866636 (S.D.N.Y.) [Hungary] [Well Settled] [Age & Maturity] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Denied]
Jenkins v Jenkins, 569 F.3d 549 (6 Cir 2009)
Jensie v Jensie, 2012 WL 5178168 (E.D.Ky.) [Sweden] [Habitual Residence]
Johnson v Johnson, 2011 WL 569876 (S.D.N.Y.)
Journe v. Journe, 911 F. Supp. 43 (D. Puerto Rico, 1995)
Judge v Williams, 2011 WL 3100346 (E.D.N.C.)
Khan v. Fatima, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 1560398 (C.A.7 (Ill.)) [Canada] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies -Rule 52 -Duty to Make Findings of Fact]
Kijowska v. Haines, 463 F.3d 583 (C.A.7 (Ill.),2006)
Khalip v Khalip, 2011 WL 1882514 (E.D. Mich.)
Kanth v. Kanth, 79 F.Supp.2d 1317 (D. Utah 1999)
Karkkainen v Kovalchuk, 445 F.3d 280 (3rd Cir. (Pa.) 2006)
Karpenko v Leendertz, --- F.3d ----, 2010 WL 3326131 (3rd Cir. (Pa.) 2010)
Klam v. Klam, 797 F. Supp. 202 (E. D. N. Y. 1992) 

Koch v Koch, 416 F.Supp.2d 645 ( E. D. Wisconsin, 2006)
Koch v Koch, 450 F.3d 703 (7th Cir.,2006)
Krefter v Willis, 623 F.Supp.2d 125 (D. Mass. 2009)
Kufner v Kufner, 440 F.Supp.2d 491 (D. R. I., 2007)
Kufner v Kufner, 519 F.3d 533 (1st Cir. 2008)
Lachman v Lachman,  2008 WL 5054198 (E.D.N.Y.) [England] [Habitual Residence]
Laguna v Avila, 2008 WL 1986253 (E. D. N. Y.) [Colombia] [Video Link Testimony] [Wishes of Child]
Lakeman v Weed, 2011 WL 824588 (D.Minn.)
Langa v Langa, --- Fed.Appx. ----, 2014 WL 60110 (C.A.3 (N.J.))[South Africa] [Habitual Residence]

Lalo v. Malca, 318 F.Supp.2d 1152 (S.D., Florida, 2004)
Larbie v Larbie, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 3089773 (C.A.5 (Tex.) [United Kingdom] [Moot Appeal ][Consent and Acquiescence] [Habitual Residence]
Larrategui v. Laborde, 2014 WL 128048 (E.D.Cal.)[Argentina] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Denied]
Larrategui v Laborde, 2014 WL 2154477 (E.D.Cal.) [Argentina] [Fees and Costs] [Not clearly inappropriate]
Lawrence v. Lewis, Slip Copy, 2015 WL 1299285 (S.D.Ohio) [United Kingdom] [Temporary Restraining Order]
Leser v Berridge,--- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 6811035 (C.A.10 (Colo.)) [Czech Republic] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Moot]
Lieberman v Tabachnik, 625 F.Supp.2d 1109 (D. Colorado 2009)
Levesque v Levesque, 816 F. Supp. 662 (D. Kansas, 1993)
Locicero v. Lurashi, 321 F. Supp. 2d 295 (D. Puerto Rico, 2004)
Lockhart v Smith, 2011 WL 4402361 (D.Me.) [Canada] [Wishes of the Child]
Londano v Gonzalez, 2013 WL 1934043, (D. Massachusetts) [Colombia] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Temporary Restraining Order]
Londono v Gonzalez, 2013 WL 6093782 (D. Mass)  [Colombia] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
Lopez v. Alcala, 547 F.Supp.2d 1255 (M. D. Fla. 2008)
Lopez v Villareal, 2012 WL 458490 (D.Nev.)) [Mexico] [Consent or Acquiescence]
Lops v. Lops, 140 F.3d 927 (11th Cir. 1998)
In re Application of Lozano, 2011 WL 3667444 (S.D.N.Y.) [United Kingdom] [Well-Settled in New Environment]
Lozano v. Alvarez, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 4479007 (C.A.2 (N.Y.)) [United Kingdom] [Well-Settled Defense] [Equitable Tolling]
Luedtke v Luedtke Thomsen, 2012 WL 2562405 (S.D.Ind.) [Switzerland] [Habitual Residence]
Lutman v Lutman, 2010 WL 3398985 (M.D.Pa.) [Isreal] [Habitual Residence]
Ly v. Heu, 296 F.Supp.2d 1009 (D. Minn. 2003)
Lynch v Mendez Lynch, 220 F. Supp.2d 1347, ( M.D. Florida, 2002)
Lyon v Lyon, 2012 WL 1970363 (D.Kan.) [England] [Consent and Acquiescence]
Lyon v. Moreland-Lyon, 2012 WL 5384558 (D.Kan.) [England] [Attorneys Fees]
March v Levine, 136 F. Supp.2d 831, (M.D. Tennessee,2000)
March v. Levine, 249 F.3d 462 (6th Cir. 2001)
Marquez v Castillo, 2014 WL 5782812 (M.D.Fla.) [Mexico] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Temporary Restraining Order]
Marquez v Castillo, 2014 WL 6883134 ( M.D. Florida)  [Mexico] [Habitual Residence]
Matas-Vidal v. Libbey-Aguilera, 2013 WL 3995300 (D.Utah) [Mexico] [TRO Granted] [Well-Settled] [Age and Maturity] [Petition Denied]
Matovski v Matovski, 2007 WL 2600862 (S. D. N. Y., 2007) [Australia] [Well Settled In New Environment] [Wishes of the Child]
Matter of Leslie v. Noble, 377 F.Supp.2d 1232 (S.D. Florida, 2005)
Matter of Mahmoud, 1997 WL 43524 (E. D. N. Y.) [England] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies]
Matter of Mohsen, 715 F. Supp. 1063 (D. Wyo. 1989)
Matter of MG v WZ, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2014 WL 5026267 (N.Y.Fam.Ct.) [New York Family Court] [Dominican Republic] [Habitual Residence]
Matter of R.B v. K.G., 2014 WL 5347587 (Fam Ct, 2014) [New York Family Court] [Israel] [Well Settled] [Age and Maturity]
Matter of S.E.O. and Y.O., 2013 WL 4564746 (S.D.N.Y.)) [Turkey] [Costs and Expenses] [Clearly Inappropriate]
Matter of SLC, 2014 WL 2801053 (M.D.Fla.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Petition granted] 
Margain v Ruiz-Bours, Not for publication, 2015 WL 500685 (9th Cir., 2015) [Mexico] [Now Settled Defense]
Mauvais v Herissee, 2014 WL 1454452 (D.Mass.)) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition granted]
Mauvais v. Herisse, 2013 WL 6383930 (D.Mass.) [Canada] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Temporary Restraining Order]
Mauvis v Herisse, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 5659412 (C.A.1 (Mass.)[Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Granted]
Maxwell v Maxwell, 588 F.3d 245 (4th Cir.(N.C.) 2009)
Maynard v. Maynard, 484 F.Supp.2d 654,  (E .D. Mich., 2007)
McCurdy v Shreve-McCurdy, 2011 WL 1457158 (E.D.Mich.) [

Mckenzie v McKenzie, 168 F.Supp.2d 47 (2001)
Mendez v. May, --- F.3d ----2015 WL 627215 (1st Cir.,2015) [Argentina] [Habitual Residence]
Mendoza v. Pascual, 2015 WL 1880309 (S.D.Ga.) [Mexico] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Temporary Restraining Order]
Mendoza v Silva, 2014 WL 658068 (N.D.Iowa) [Mexico] [ Attorneys Fees] [Clearly inappropriate]
Mendoza v Silva, 2013 WL 6491479 (N.D.Iowa) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Consent or acquiescence] [video testimony] [Petition Granted] [Stay pending appeal denied]
Menechem v Menechem, 246 F.Supp.2d 437 (D. Md., 2003)
Meredith v. Meredith, 759 F. Supp. 1432, 1433 (D.Ariz.1991)
Mero v Prieto, 557 F.Supp.2d 357 (E.D.N.Y.)
In re Mikovic v Mikovic, 541 F.Supp.2d 1264 (M.D. Fla, 2007)
 

Miller v Miller, 240 F.3d 392, (4th Cir.,2001)
Miltiadous v Tetervak, 686 F.Supp.2d 544, 686 F.Supp.2d 544 ( E.D. Pennsylvania)
Montero-Garcia v. Montero, 2013 WL 6048992 (W.D.N.C.) [Dominican Republic] [Attorneys Fees]
Moura v Cunha, --- F.Supp.3d ----, 2014 WL 7251039 (D.Mass.) [Brazil] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition granted]
Mlynarski v. Pawezka, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 1150310 (D. Mass, 2013) [Poland] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Granted]
Morgan v. Morgan, 289 F.Supp.2d 1067 (N.D. Iowa 2003)
Morton v Morton, 982 F. Supp. 675 (D. Nebraska, 1997)
Mota v. Castillo, --- F.3d ----, 2012 WL 3330176 (C.A.2 (N.Y.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence]
Mozes v Mozes, 239 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir, 2001) 

Mezo v. Elmergawi, 855 F. Supp. 59 (E. D. N. Y. 1994)
Muhlemkamp v Blizzard, 521 F Supp 2d 1140 (E.D. Washington)
Mlynarski v. Pawezka, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 1150310 (D. Mass, 2013) [Poland] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Granted]
Munoz v. Rivera, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 563419 (W.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Granted]
Murphy v. Sloan, 2013 WL 4725120 (N.D. California) [Ireland] [Temporary Restraining Order] [No Security Required] [Deposit Passports]
Murphy v Sloan, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 4179961 (C.A.9 (Cal.)) [Ireland] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
Navani v Shahani, 496 F.3d 1121 (10th Cir., 2007)
Neergaard v Colon, 2014 WL 936691 (D.Mass.)[Singapore] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Granted]
Neergaard-Colon v Neergaard, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 2111307 (C.A.1 (Mass.)) [Singapore] [Habitual Residence] [Remanded]
Nelson v Petterle, 2011 WL 1048107 (E.D.Cal.) [
Neves v Neves, 637 F. Supp 2d 322 (W. D. North Carolina, 2009)
Nicolson v Pappalardo, 674 F.Supp.2d 295, (D. Maine, 2010)
Nicolson v Pappalardo, 605 F.3d 100 (1st Cir. (Me.))
Nixon v Nixon, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 7972481 (D.N.M.) [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Ngassa v Mpafe, 488 F.Supp.2d 514 (D. Maryland, 2007)
Norinder v Fuentes, --- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 3966153 (7th Cir.(Ill.))[Sweden] [Discovery] [Habitual Residence] [Attorneys Fees]
Norden-Powers v. Beveridge, 125 F.Supp.2d 634 (E. D. N. Y. 2000)
Nunez-Escudero v. Tice-Menley, 58 F.3d 374 (8th Cir.1995)
Oddy v Morris, 2012 WL 464227 (D.Hawaii) [United Kingdom] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Ohlander v. Larson, 114 F.3d 1531 (10th Cir.1997)
Ordon Ez v. Tacuri,  2009 WL 2928903 (E. D. N. Y. 2009) [Ecuador] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Video link Testimony]
Ortiz v Cantu, 2009 WL 8543610 (S.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Rights of custody] [Patria Postestas]
Ortiz v. Martinez, 2014 WL 1409446 (N.D.Ill.)  [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition denied]
Ostos v Vega, 2015 WL 569124 (N.D. Texas, Dallas Division) [Mexico] [Motion to dismiss] [Maintain Statues Quo] [Guardian Ad Litem] [Expedited Discovery]
Ozaltin v Ozaltin, 708 F.3d 355 (2d Cir. 2013) [Turkey] [Rights of Access] [Attorney Fees]
Ozaltin v Ozaltin, 2012 WL 2026443 (S.D.N.Y.) [Turkey] [Well-Settled] [Rights of access]
Ozgul v. Ozgul, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 3981238 (D.Colo.) [Germany] [Habitual Residence]
Panteleris v Panteleris, 2014 WL 3053211 (N.D.Ohio) [Australia] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of Custody] [Petition granted]
Panteleris v. Panteleris, --- Fed.Appx. ----, 2015 WL 468197(6th Cir., 2015) [Australia] [Habitual Residence]
Papakosmas v Papakosmas, 483 F.3d 617 (9th Cir.(Cal.) 2007)
Pasten v Velasquez, 462 F.Supp.2d 1206 (M.D. Alabama, 2006)
Patrick v. Rivera-Lopez, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 388053 (C.A.1 (Puerto Rico)) [Puerto Rico] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies - Bond] [Rights of Custody]
Patrick v. Rivera-Lopez, 2012 WL 5462677 (D.Puerto Rico) [England] [Rights of Custody]
Paulus ex rel. P.F.V. v. Cordero, 2013 WL 432769 (M.D.Pa.) [Dominican Republic] [Attorney Fees and Costs] [Pro Bono Counsel]
Paz v Paz, 169 F.Supp.2d 254 (S.D. New York, 2001)
Pesin v Osorio Rodriguez, 77 F.Supp.2d 1277 ( S.D. Florida, 1999) 

Pesin v. Rodriguez, 244 F.3d 1250 (11th Cir. 2001)

People ex rel. Ron v. Levi, 719 N.Y.S.2d 365 (App. Div. 2001)
Philippopoulos, v. Philippopoulou, 461 F.Supp.2d 1321 ( N.D. Georgia, 2006)
Pielage v McConnell, 516 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2008)
Pignoloni v Gallagher, 2014 WL 642596 (2d Cir 2014) [Italy] [Consent] [Petition denied]
Pignoloni v Gallagher, Slip Copy, 2012 WL 5904440 (E.D.N.Y.) [Italy] [Consent]
Pliego v Hayes, 2014 WL 6674560 (W.D.Ky.)[Turkey] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Expert Testimony][Privilege]
Pliego v. Hayes, 2015 WL 1893426 (W.D.Ky.) [Turkey] [Costs and Expenses]
Ponce v Sanchez, 2011 WL 6820332 (D.Colo.) [Mexico] [Attorney Fees]
Prevot v Prevot , 59 F.3d 556 (6th Cir, 1995)
Prouse v. Thoreson, 2012 WL 5199182 (W.D.Wis.) [Italy] [Habitual Residence]
Radu v Toader, 2011 WL 3418368 (E.D.N.Y.)
Radu v Toder, 2012 WL 556174 (C.A.2 (N.Y.) [Romania] [Rights of Custody]

Raijmakers-Eghaghe v. Haro, 131 F.Supp.2d 953 (E. D. Mich. 2001)
Ramirez v Buyauskas, 2012 WL 606746 (E.D.Pa.) [Mexico] ["Patria potestas'] [Well-settled in New Environment] [Wishes of the Child]
Rana v Multani, Slip Copy, 2015 WL 2330163 (S.D.N.Y.) [Canada] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies]
Redmond v Redmond, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 3821595 (C.A.7 (Ill.))[Ireland] [Habitual Residence]
Rehder v Rehder, 2014 WL 6982530 ( W.D. Wash) [Germany] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of Custody] [Petition granted]
Reyes v Jeffcoat, 2012 WL 4009641 (D.S.C.) [Venezuela] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Evidence]
Rial v Rijo, 2010 WL 1643995 (S. D. N. Y.) [Spain] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Rigby v Damant, 486 F.Supp.2d 222 (D. Mass. 2009)
Rigby v Damant, 486 F.3d 692 (1st Cir. 2007)

Rivera Rivas v. Segovia, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 5394778 (W.D.Ark.) [El Salvador] [Well-Settled in New Environment]
Robert v Tesson, 507 F.3d 981 (6th Cir., 2008)
Roche v Hartz, 2011 WL 841556 (N.D.Ohio)
Rodriguez v. Sieler, 2012 WL 5430369 (D.Mont.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 20]
Romero-Mejia v. Ivers, 2013 WL 1412237 (E.D.Wash.) [Mexico] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies ][Temporary Restraining Order]
Rovirosa v. Paetau, 2012 WL 6087481 (S.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Patria Postestas]
Rowe v Vargason, 2011 WL 4529341 (D. Minn.) [Australia] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Well Settled in New Environment] [Conditional order]
Rowe v Vargason, 2011 WL 6151523 (D.Minn.) [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Australia]

Roy v Roy, 432 F.Supp.2d 1297 (S.D. Florida, 2006) affirmed sub nom Hanley v Roy , supra.
R.S. v. D.O., 2012 WL 874833 (N.Y.Sup.) [Italy] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies]
Rydder v Rydder, 49 F.3d 369 (8th Cir.,1995)
Saldivar v Rodela, 2012 WL 2914833 (W.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Rights of custody] [Consent]
Salvidar v Rodella, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 4497507 (W.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Attorneys Fees]
Salinier v. Moore, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 3515699 (D.Colo.) [France] [Attorneys Fees and Costs]
Salazar v Maimon, 2014 WL 1688197 (5th Cir., 2014) [Venezuela] [Attorneys Fees and Necessary Expenses]
San Martin v. Moquillaza, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2014 WL 3924646 (E.D.Tex.) [Peru] [Habitual Residence] [Petition granted]
Sanchez-Londono v. Gonzalez, 752 F.3d 533 (1st Cir., 2014) [Colombia] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
Sanchez v. R.G.L.,--- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 684606 (C.A.5 (Tex.)) [Mexico] [Proper Respondent] [Child’s Right to Appeal] [Guardian ad litem] [Effect of asylum pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1158. ]
Sanchez v Sanchez, 2012 WL 3204183 (W.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Well-Settled] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies]
Sasson v. Sasson, 327 F.Supp.2d 489 (D. New Jersey, 2004)
Sealed Appellant v Sealed Appellee 394 F.3d 338 (5th Cir. (Tex.) 2004)
Sealed Appellee v Sealed Appellant, --- Fed.Appx. ----, 2014 WL 3585835 (C.A.5 (Tex.))[Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Granted]
Seaman v Patterson, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 124223 (M.D.Ga.)
Seaman v. Peterson, 2014 WL 4377582, --- F.3d ---- (11th Cir., 2014) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Petition granted]
Selo v. Selo, 2013 WL 878959 (E.D.Mich.) [Switzerland] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
Shalit v. Coppe, 182 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir., 1999)
Shealy v. Shealy, 295 F.3d 1117 (10th Cir., 2002)
Sheikh v. Cahill, 145 Misc. 2d 171, 546 N.Y.S.2d 517 (Sup. Ct. 1989)
Silverman v. Silverman, 267 F.3d 788 (8th Cir. 2001)

Silverman v Silverman, 338 F.3d 886 (8th Cir, 2003)
Silvestri v Oliva, 403 F.Supp.2d 378 ( D. New Jersey, 2005)
Singh v Pierpont, 2014 WL 6471374 (D. Hawaii) [Canada] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Res Judicata]
Simcox v Simcox, 511 F.3d 594 (C.A.6 (Ohio))
Skolnick v Wainer, 2013 WL 6732656 (D.Conn.) [Singapore] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Motion to Dismiss] [Consent or acquiescence]
Skolnick v. Wainer, 2013 WL 5329112 (E.D.N.Y.)) [Singapore] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Jurisdiction][Venue]
Slagenweit v. Slagenweit, 841 F. Supp. 264 (N.D. Iowa 1993), dismissed, 43 F.3d 1476 and dismissed, 43 F.3d 1476.
Slight v. Noonkester, 2014 WL 282642 (D.Mont.) [Ireland] [Wrongful Retention] [Chasing order] [Well-Settled] [Petition Denied]
Smedley v Smedley, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 5647426 (C.A.4 (N.C.) [Germany] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Comity] [Petition Granted]
Souratgar v Fair, 2012 WL 6700214 (S.D. N.Y., 2012) [Singapore] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Souratgar v. Fair, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 2631375 (C.A.2 (N.Y.))[Singapore] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Fundamental Freedoms]
Sorenson v Sorenson, 559 F.3d 871 (8th Cir 2009)
State ex rel Geiser v Valentine, 11/16/2007 NYLJ 30, (col. 3) (Sup. Ct, Richmond Co., Minardo, J.) 

Steffen F. v. Severina P., 966 F.Supp.2d 922 (E. Ariz. 1997)
Stern v Stern, --- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 1706912 (8th Cir.(Iowa))
Stirzaker v. Beltran, 2010 WL 1418388 (D.Idaho) [Mexico][Rights of Custody][Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 20]
Suarez v Castrillo, 2011 WL 2669198 (D.Colo.)
Tavares v Morales, 2014 WL 2038318 (S.D.N.Y.) [Spain] [Now Settled] [Petition Denied]

Taveras v. Taveras,  397 F. Supp. 908, (S.D. Ohio, 2005)
Tavaras v Tavaras, 477 F. 3d 767 (6th Cir., 2006)
Taveras ex rel. L.A.H. v. Morales, --- Fed.Appx. ----, 2015 WL 2263023 (C.A.2 (N.Y.)) (summary order) [Spain] [Now Settled]
Taylor v Hunt, 2013 WL 620934 (E.D.Tex.) [Canada] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Guardian Ad Litem] [Guardian Fees] [Petition Granted]
Taylor v Taylor, 2012 WL 6631395 (C.A.11 (Fla.)) [United Kingdom] [Grave Risk of Harm] 

Teijeiro Fernandez v. Yeager, 121 F.Supp.2d 1118 (W. D. Mich. 2000)
Tenorio Ruiz v Tenorio, 392 F.3d 1247 (11th Cir.)
Thomson v Gnirk, 2012 WL 3598854 (D.N.H.) [Canada] [Habitual Residence]
Tlustochowicz v. Tlustochowicz, 2012 WL 3779071 (N.D.Ill.) [Poland] [Article 15] [Habitual Residence]
Toren v. Toren, 191 F.3d 23 (1st Cir. 1999)
Trundig v Trundig, 686 F.Supp.2d 570 ( M.D. North Carolina, 2010) 
 
Tsarbopoulos v Tsarbopoulos, 176 F.Supp.2d 1045 (E. D. Washington, 2001)
Tucker v Ellenby, 2011 WL 5361154 (S.D.Fla.) [Belize] [Yunger and Colorado River Abstention]
Uzoh v Uzoh, 2012 WL 1565345 (N.D.Ill.)) [England] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Unclean hands]
Vale v. Avila, 2008 U.S. App. Lexis 17068 (7 Cir. 2008)
Valenzuela v Michel, 2013 WL 6038240 (9th Cir., 2013) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence]
Van De Sande v. Van De Sande, 431 F.3d 567 (7th Cir., 2005)
Van Driessche v. Ohio-Esezeoboh, 466 F.Supp.2d 828 (S.D. Tex.,2006)
Vasconcelos v. Batista, 2013 WL 600200 (C.A.5 (Tex.)) [Brazil] [Age and Maturity]
Vasquez v Colores,--- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 3366380 (8th Cir.(Minn.)
Vasquez v Estrada, 2011 WL 196164 (N.D.Tex.) [Mexico][Grave Risk of Harm]
Velasquez v Green, 2012 WL 2885662 (E.D.Tex.)) [Canada] [Well-Settled in New Environment] [Age and Maturity]
Velasquez v Velasquez, 2014 WL 7272934 (E.D.Va.) [El Salvador] [Provisional Remedies] [Temporary Restraining order]
Velasquez v. Funes de Velasquez, 2015 WL 1565142 [E.D. Virginia ] [El Salvador] [Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Vasquez v Vasquez, 2013 WL 7045041 (N.D.Tex.) [Mexico] [Consent] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Petition Denied]
Vilchis v. Hall, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2014 WL 2978378 (N.D.Ill.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Petition Denied]
Viteri v Pflucker, 550 F.Supp.2d 829 (ND Illinois 2008)
Von Kennel Gaudin v. Remis, 282 F.3d 1178 (9th Cir. 2002)
Vujicevic v. Vujicevic, 2013 WL 2627132 (W.D.Wash.) [Croatia] [Age & Maturity] [Petition Denied]
Vujicevic v Vujicevic, 2012 WL 4948640 (S.D.N.Y.) [Croatia] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Notice & Opportunity to Be Heard]
Vujicevic v Vujicevic, 2012 WL 5896766 (S.D.N.Y.) [Croatia] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] Service of Process]
Walker v. Kitt, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2012 WL 5237262 (N.D.Ill.) [Israel] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Article 20]
Walker v Walker, 2013 WL 1110876 (N.D.Ill.) [Australia] [Habitual Residence] [Age & Maturity] [Petition Granted]
Walker v Walker, 2012 WL 5668330 (C.A.7 (Ill.) [Australia] [Habitual Residence] [Consent]
Walker v Walker, 2011 WL 5008533 (N.D.Ill.) [Australia] [Habitual Residence] [Abandonment and Consent]

In re Walsh, 31 F.Supp.2d 200 (D. Mass. 1998)
In re Walsh, 53 F.Supp.2d 91 (D. Mass. 1999)  
Walsh v. Walsh, 221 F.3d 204 (1st Cir. 2000)
Walton v. Walton, 925 F. Supp. 453 (S.D. Miss., 1996)
Wanninger v. Wanninger, 850 F. Supp. 78 (D. Mass, 1994)
West v Dobrev, 2013 WL 5813749 (10th Cir, 2013) [France] [Belgium] [Summary Determination] 

Whallon v. Lynn, 230, F.3d 450 (1st Cir. (Mass.) 2000)
Whallon v. Lynn, 356 F.3d 138 (1st Cir.,2004)
White v White, 2012 WL 3041660 (S.D.N.Y.)  [Germany] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies] [Rooker-Feldman Doctrine] [Res Judicata] [Collateral Estoppel][Failure to State a Claim]
White v. White, 556 Fed. Appx. 10 (2d Cir., 2014) [Fed & State Judicial Remedies] [Petition Denied]
White v White, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 2284877 (C.A.4 (Va.)) [Switzerland] [Rights of Custody]
White v White, 893 F.Supp.2d 755 (E.D. Va, 2013) [Switzerland] [Attorneys Fees and Costs]
Whiting v Krassner, 391 F.3d 540 ( 3rd Cir, 2004)
Wiezel v. Wiezel-Tyranauer, 385 F.Supp.2d 240 (S. D. N. Y., 2005)
Wiggill v Janicki, 262 F.Supp.2d 687 ( S.D. West Virginia, 2003)
Witherspoon v Orange County Dept. of Social Services, 646 F. Supp 2d 1176, (C.D. California, 2009)
Wood v Wood, 2013 WL 1907492, (E. D. Washington) [United Kingdom] [Federal & State Judicial Remedies ][Temporary Restraining Order] [Deposit Passport with Court]
Wojcik v. Wojcik, 959 F.Supp.2d 413 (ED. Mich. 1997)
Yaman v. Yaman, 2013 WL 322204 (D.N.H.) [Turkey] [Well-Settled] [Equitable Tolling]
Yaman v. Yaman, --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 4827587 (C.A.1 (N.H.)) [Turkey] [Now Settled] [Equitable Tolling] [Article 18] [Guardian Ad Litem] [Petition Denied]
Yang v Tsui, 416 F.3d 199 (3d Cir.,2005)
Yang v Tsui, 499 F.3d 259 (3d Cir., 2007)
Zajaczkowski v. Zajaczkowska, 932 F. Supp. 128 (D. Maryland) 
Zuker v. Andrews
, 2 F.Supp.2d 134 (D. Mass. 1998)
Unpublished Federal and New York State Hague Convention Cases through May 20, 2015. (Alphabetical) 

Click to Visit "A Child is Missing: The International Child  Abduction Blog" - Our blog devoted to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Hague Convention Articles are reported on this website and Hague Convention cases since May 20, 2015 are reported on our blog.  

​Caution
 Should be Exercised in Citing Opinions Designated As "unpublished," "not for publication," "non-precedential," "not precedent"

Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule, 28 U.S.C.A. 32.1 (a) now provide that a court may not prohibit or restrict the citation of federal judicial opinions, orders, judgments, or other written dispositions that have been: (i) designated as "unpublished," "not for publication," "non-precedential," "not precedent," or the like; and (ii) issued on or after January 1, 2007.

Rule 32.1(a) applies only to unpublished opinions issued on or after January 1, 2007. The citation of unpublished opinions issued before January 1, 2007, continues to be governed by the local rules of the circuits, which counsel is advised to refer to before citing such opinions. See Advisory Committee Notes.
Under Rule 32.1(b), a party who cites an opinion of a federal court must provide a copy of that opinion to the court of appeals and to the other parties, unless that opinion is available in a publicly accessible electronic database -- such as a commercial database maintained by a legal research service or a database maintained by a court. A party who is required under Rule 32.1(b) to provide a copy of an opinion must file and serve the copy with the brief or other paper in which the opinion is cited. Rule 32.1(b) applies to all unpublished opinions, regardless of when they were issued.

Rule 32.1 was added April. 12, 2006, effective December 1, 2006 and is a new rule addressing the citation of judicial opinions, orders, judgments, or other written dispositions that have been designated by a federal court as "unpublished," "not for publication," "non-precedential," "not precedent," or the like. Rule 32.1 addresses only the citation of federal judicial dispositions that have been designated as "unpublished" or "non-precedential" -- whether or not those dispositions have been published in some way or are precedential in some sense. Every court of appeals has allowed unpublished opinions to be cited in some circumstances, such as to support a contention of issue preclusion or claim preclusion. But the circuits have differed dramatically with respect to the restrictions that they have placed on the citation of unpublished opinions for their persuasive value. Some circuits have freely permitted such citation, others have discouraged it but permitted it in limited circumstances, and still others have forbidden it altogether.

See also Local Rule U.S. Ct. of App. 2nd Cir. 0.23, 28 U.S.C.A.
0.23. Dispositions by Summary Order
(a) Use of Summary Orders
The demands of contemporary case loads require the court to be conscious of the need to utilize judicial time effectively. Accordingly, in those cases in which decision is unanimous and each judge of the panel believes that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion (i.e., a ruling having precedential effect), the ruling may be by summary order instead of by opinion.
(b) Precedential Effect of Summary Orders
Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect.
(c) Citation of Summary Orders
(1) Citation to summary orders filed after January 1, 2007, is permitted.
(A) In a brief or other paper in which a litigant cites a summary order, in each paragraph in which a citation appears, at least one citation must either be to the Federal Appendix or be accompanied by the notation: "(summary order)."
(B) Unless the summary order is available in an electronic database which is publicly accessible without payment of fee (such as the database available athttp://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/), the party citing the summary order must file and serve a copy of that summary order together with the paper in which the summary order is cited. If no copy is served by reason of the availability of the order on such a database, the citation must include reference to that database and the docket number of the case in which the order was entered.


Alonzo v. Claudino, 2007 WL 475340 (M.D.N.C) [Honduras][ Habitual Residence]
Andreopoullos v Koutroulos, 2009 WL 1850928 (D. Colo.))[Greece] [Wishes of Child]
Application of Hirtz v Hirtz, 2004 WL 1588227 (E. D. Pa.) [Germany] [Attorneys Fees and Costs]
Application of Nicholson v. Nicholson, 1997 WL 446432 (D. Kan.) [Germany] [Habitual Residence]
Axford v Axford, 2009 WL 2030755 (E.D.Pa.))[England] [Surrender Passports]
Burns v Burns, No. Civ. A. 96-6268 (E.D. Pa., Dec 6, 1996) [United Kingdom] [Full Faith & Credit]
Casimiro v Chavez, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2006 WL 2938713 (N.D.Ga. 2007) [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Wishes of the Child]
Chechel v Brignol, 2010 WL 2510391 (M.D.Fla.) [Ukraine] [Consent]
Clausier v. Mueller, 2004 WL 906514 (N. D. Tex.) [France][ Habitual Residence]
Clarke v Clarke, 2008 WL 5191682 (E.D.Pa.))[Australia] [Attorneys Fees]
Cook v Scott, 2008 WL 2947692 (E.D.Mich.) [England] [Rights of Custody]
Copeland v Copeland, 134 F3d 362 (4th Cir., 1998) [France] [Colorado River Abstention]
Etienne v. Zuniga, 2010 WL 2262341 (W.D.Wash.) [Mexico] [Well-Settled in New Environment]
Fernandez v Bailey, 2010 WL 2773569 (E.D.Mo.) [Panama] [Rights of Custody] [Ne Exeat right]
Flynn v Boarders, 2007 WL 862548 (M. D. Kentucky) [Ireland] [Attorneys Fees and Costs]
Freiderich v Thompson, 1999 WL 33951234 (M. D. N. C.)[ Germany] [Attorneys Fees and Costs]
Gatica v. Martinez, 2010 WL 6744790 (S.D.Fla.) [Mexico] [Rights of Custody] [Patria Potestas] [Wishes of the child]
Gatica v. Martinez, 2011 WL 2110291 (S.D.Fla.)[Mexico] [Rights of Custody] [Patria Potestas] [Wishes of the child]
Grammes v Grammes, 2003 WL 22518715 (E. D. Pa.)) [Canada][ Habitual Residence]
Grijalva v. Escayola, 2006 WL 3827539 (M.D. Fla.) [Mexico] [Rights of Custody-Exercise]
Halaf v Halaf, 08-CV-4958, Decided 02/24/09--3/2/2009 N.Y.L.J. 22, (col. 3) [Israel] [Habitual Residence]
Haro v. Woltz, Slip Copy, 2010 WL 3279381 (E.D.Wis.) [Mexico] [Habitual Residence] [Sufficient age and maturity]
Harris v Harris, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2003 WL 23162326 (E.D.Pa.) [Czech Republic] [Habitual Residence]
Hirts v Hirts, 153 Fed. Appx. 137 (3d Cir. 2005) [Germany] [Attorneys Fees and Costs]
In re E.D.T. ex rel. Adamah v. Tayson, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2010 WL 2265308 (E.D.N.Y.) [United Kingdom] [Habitual residence]
In re Interest of Zarate, No. 96 C 50394, N.D. Ill., Dec 23, 1996 [Mexico] [Rights of Custody]
In re Krishna v. Krishna, 1997 WL 195439 N. D. Cal.) [ Australia] [Grave risk of harm] [Consent]
In re Roux v. Roux, 2007 WL 329138 (D. Ariz. 2007) [Canada] [Rights of Custody] [Dual Habitual Residence]
In re Skrodzki, 2007 WL 1965391 (E.D.N.Y., 2007) [Poland] [Rights of Custody]
Isaac v. Rice, 1998 WL 527107 (N. D. Miss.) [Israel] [Sufficient Age and Maturity]
Jaet v Sisto 2009 WL 35270 (slip copy) SD Fla 2009)[Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Janzik v Shand, (N.D., Ilinois, November 22, 2000) [Germany] [No Jurisdiction to Enforce Rights of Access]
Jimenez v Lozano, 2007 WL 527499 (W. D. Wash.) [Mexico] [Rights of Custody]
Kofler v. Kofler, 2007 WL 2081712 (W.D. Ark., 2007) [Germany] [Wishes of the Child] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Lebiedzinski v Crane, 2005 WL 906368 (D. Alaska) [Poland] [Attorneys Fees and Costs]
Leites v Mendiburu, 2008 WL 114954 (M.D. Fla.) [Argentina] [Wishes of Child] [Grave Risk of Harm]
Lockhart v. Smith, 2006 WL 3091295 (D.Me. 2006) [Canada] [Well Settled in New Environment]
Matter of Ago v Odu, 2009 WL 2169857 (M.D.Fla.)) [Italy] [Wishes of the Child]
McCubbin v McCubbin, 2006 WL 1797922 (W. D .Mo.) [Australia] [Habitual Residence]
Mohammad v Guuleed, 2009 WL 1229986 (E. D. Wis.))[England] [Child Age 16]
Morrison v Dietz, 2008 WL 4280030  (W. D. La.) [Mexico] [Expert testimony] [equitable Tolling]
Olagues v Kousharian, 177 Fed. Appx. 537 (9th Cir. 2006) [New Zealand] [Moot]
Olesen-Frayne v. Olesen, 2009 WL 3048451 (M.D.Fla.) [United Kingdom] [Attorneys Fees]
Olguin v Santana, 2004 WL 1752444 (E. D. N. Y.) [Mexico] [Grave Risk of Harm] [Rights of Custody - Exercise of Rights]
Ostevoll v. Ostevoll, 2000 WL 1611123 (S.D. Ohio) [Norway][ Failure to Prosecute. Motion to Change Venue]
Paz v. De Paz, 47 Fed. Appx. 22 (2d Cir.,2002) [not selected for publication in the Federal Reporter] [New Zealand] [Habitual Residence]
Poliero v Centenaro, Slip Copy, 2009 WL 2947193  (E. D. N. Y. 2009) [Italy] [Surrender Passport]
Prinz v Faso, 2004 WL 1071761 (W. D. N. Y.) [Habitual Residence] [Germany]
Riley v. Gooch, 2010 WL 373993 (D.Or.) [Germany] [Habitual Residence]
Robert v. Tesson , 2005 WL 1652620 (S.D. Ohio) [France] [Habitual Residence]
Robert v Tesson, 2006 WL 1401651 (S. D. Ohio) [France] [Habitual Residence]
Samholt v Samholt, 2006 WL 2128061 (M. D. N. C.) [Habitual Residence] [Sweden]
Silverman v. Silverman, 2004 WL 2066778 (D. Minn) [Attorneys Fees and Costs]
Sita-Mambwene v. Keeton, 2009 WL 2836430 (E.D.Mo.) [Germany] [Equitable Tolling] [Well Settled in New Environment]
Small v. Clark, 2006 WL 2024955 (M.D. Fla.) [Belize] [Habitual Residence]
Smyth v Blatt,--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2009 WL 3786244 (E. D. N. Y.) [Switzerland] [Wishes of the Child] [Grave Risk of Harm] This opinion has been removed from electronic and print publication at the request of the court.
Stewart v Marrun, 2009 WL 1530820 (E.D.Tex.)) [Canada] [Great Risk of Harm]
Tabacchi v. Harrison, 2000 WL 190576 (D. Ill) [Italy] [Consent]
Valverde v. Rivas, 2008 WL 4185831 (D.Ariz.))[Mexico] [Well Settled]
Villata v Massie, No. 4:99cv 312-RH (N. D. Fla. Oct. 27, 1999) [Chile] [Habitual Residence]
Wasniewski v Grzelak-Johannsen, 2007 WL 2344760 (N.D. Ohio) [Poland] [Habitual Residence]
Yang v Tsui, --- F.Supp.2d ----, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2006 WL 2466095 (W. D. Pa) [Taiwan] [Habitual Residence] [Wishes of the Child]
Yocom v Yocom [Not reported in F. Supp. 2d] 2005 WL 1863422 [Habitual Residence] [Germany]


Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Recent Decisions & Articles
    • Recent Decisions, Legislation and Court Rules
    • New York Law Journal Articles by Joel R. Brandes
    • Articles Published in NYSBA Family Law Review and Journal
    • Bits and Bytes™ Issues - New York Divorce and Family Law Newsletter
    • Table of Contents of this website
    • Joel R. Brandes Letters to the Editor
    • Recent International Child Abduction Cases
    • Books by Joel R. Brandes
    • Adoption Information Articles
    • Child Abuse & Prevention Articles
    • Common Law Marriage Articles
    • Child Visitation Supervisors
    • Domestic Violence Articles
    • Engagement gifts Articles
    • Family Court Proceedings Articles
    • Grandparent and Non-Parent Visitation Articles
    • Professional Conduct Articles
    • Income Tax and Capital Gains Tax Articles
    • Spousal Support Articles
  • Divorce Information
    • Antenuptial, Prenuptial, Nuptial and Post Nuptial Agreements
    • Child Custody, Visitation (Parental Access) & Parental Alienation
    • Child Support
    • Counsel Fee Awards
    • Degrees & Licenses
    • Emergency Court Applications
    • Enforcement of Judgments & Orders
    • Equitable Distribution of Marital Property
    • Equitable Distribution Law for Trial Counsel
    • Equitable Distribution Decisions Chart to January 1, 2023
    • Exclusive Occupancy of Marital Home
    • Frequently Asked Questions About Marriage, Divorce, Separation and Custody
    • Grounds for Divorce
    • Legal Fees, Liens & Sanctions
    • Litigation & Procedure
    • Maintenance Awards until 2016
    • Maintenance Awards on or after January 22, 2016
    • Maintenance, Special Relief & Spousal Support
    • Maintenance and Child Support New York Court System Tools
    • Marital Property, Separate Property and Property Distribution
    • Motion Practice
    • Modification of Maintenance and Child Support Orders and Judgments
    • Orders of Protection
    • Qualified Domestic Relations Orders
    • Retirement Benefits
    • Right to Counsel in Matrimonial Action
    • Role of the Attorney for the Child
    • Special Relief (life, health, accident, medical and dental insurance)
    • Social Security Benefits for Divorced Spouses
    • Table of Effective dates of Revisions to Domestic Relations Law §§ 236, 237, and 240
    • Trial and Trial Testimony
    • Trial and Trial Testimony 2023 Update
    • Trial of a Divorce and Custody Action Website
    • Trial Evidence for Divorce and Family Law
    • Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction & Enforcement Act Overview
    • Valuation Aids
  • Appellate Practice
    • Important Practice Updates from the Appellate Divisions
    • Instructions for taking an Appeal to the Appellate Division
    • Taking an Appeal from Supreme Court under NYCSEF
    • Who is served with the notice of appeal?
    • Registration and Consent to Efiling by Respondents
    • Preserving the Right to Appeal
    • Appellate Division is Single Statewide Court
    • Appeals to the Appellate Division as of Right from the Supreme Court
    • Permissible Appellant—“Aggrieved party” and Mootness doctrine
    • Permissible Appellant - Appealable Judgment or Order
    • Permissible Appellant - Appeal from Order denying motion with leave to renew or without prejudice
    • Appeals : Appellate Review of Non-final Orders in Matrimonial Actions
    • Appeals : Fundamental and Harmless Error
    • Appeals : Matrimonial Presumptions and the Burden of Proof
    • Appeals : Stare Decisis, Precedent and Dicta
    • Appeals : Understanding the Support Magistrate Objection Process
    • Appeals to the Appellate Division from Family Court
    • Perfecting the Appeal to the Appellate Division - Methods
    • Perfecting the Appeal to the Appellate Division - Appellate Division Bound by Record
    • Perfecting the Appeal to the Appellate Division - Order and Settle the Transcript
    • Method of Settlement of the Transcript
    • Appeals to Appellate Division from Supreme Court by permission
    • Form of Record and Briefs - Parties, Docket Number, Method of Reproduction
    • ​Form of Briefs and Appendices - CPLR
    • What must be in the Reproduced Full Record
    • What is the Judgment-roll?
    • What must be in the Appendix.
    • What must be in Briefs
    • Time, number and manner of filing of records, appendices and briefs
    • Cross appeals - Briefing Schedule, Joint Record, Content of Briefs, Time for Service
    • Extension of time to perfect appeal
    • Concurrent appeals, Appeals from a single order or judgment. Consolidation of Appeals.
    • First Department Requirement of note of issue
    • Stay of Enforcement of Order or Judgment Pending Appeal
    • Practice in the Appellate Division: What Laws Govern
    • Practice Rules of the Appellate Divison: Joint & Local Rules
    • Practice in the Appellate Division First Department New and Amended Local Rules June 25, 2021
    • Practice in the Appellate Division, First Department, Frequently asked questions
    • Practice in the Appellate Divison: Motions in the First Department
    • Practice in the Appellate Divison: Motions in the Second Department
    • Practice in the Appellate Division: Motions in the Third Department
    • Practice In The Appellate Division:Motions in the Fourth Department
    • Instructions for Taking an Appeal Frequently Asked Questions
    • Instructions for Perfecting an Appeal to the Appellate Division
    • Instructions to Perfect an Appeal in the Third Department
    • Instructions to perfect an appeal in the Fourth Department
    • Appellate Division Fourth Department Q & A
    • Universal E-filing in the Fourth Department
    • Standards of Appellate Review in Matrimonial Actions
    • Standards of Appellate Review of Custody Determinations
    • Standards of Appellate Review of Custody Determinations - Changed Circumstances during pendency of appeal
    • Standards of Review : Fugative disentitlement doctrine in custody and child support appealsw Page
    • Mandatory Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Digital submission in Non-Efiled Matters
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department New and Amended Local Rules
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Formatting Specifications
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Frequently Asked Questions
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Second Department Technical Guidelines
    • Mandatory Electronic filing (e-filing): Second Department
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Motions Frequently Asked Questions
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Second Department - Motions -22 NYCRR 670.4 (d)
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Third Department - Digital Copies - 22 NYCRR 850.4 (a)
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Third Department Motion FAQs
    • Mandatory Electronic filing (e-filing): Fourth Department
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Fourth Department Motion FAQS
    • Electronic filing Authorization in matrimonial actions
    • E-filing Rules and Forms of the Appellate Division
    • Joel R. Brandes Reported Appeals
    • Court of Appeals Rules of Practice
    • How to take an Appeal to the Court of Appeals
    • Appeals as of Right to the Court of Appeals
    • Motions for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeals
    • Guidelines for Preparing a Motion for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeal
    • Rule 500.11 Review Alternate Procedure for Selected Appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Appealability and Reviewability in the Court of Appeals
    • What is a Final Determination appealable to Court of Appeals?
    • The "Necessarily Affects" Requirement of the Court of Appeals
    • Filing of record material and briefs in normal course appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Contents of Records, Appendices and Exhibits in Normal Course Appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Content and form of Briefs in Normal Course Appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Frequently Asked Questions for Civil and Criminal Appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Civil Motions in the Court of Appeals Frequently Asked Questions
    • Court-Pass - Court of Appeals Digital Filing Frequently Asked Questions
    • Court of Appeals Portal for uploading companion digital submissions
    • Court of Appeals Court Pass Public Access and Search
  • Trial of a Divorce and Custody Action
  • ​New York Court System Links for Lawyers
  • New York Court Rules
  • Electronic Filing in Supreme Court Rules and FAQ's
  • Removal of NYCSEF Consent 22 NYCRR 202.16-c
  • Sending Documents to the Court Using EDDS
  • Family Court Official Forms
  • New York Courts Case Search Page for E-filed Case Files
  • New York Court System Site Map
  • New York Court Websites and Decisions
  • International Child Abduction Laws and Information
  • Hague International Child Abduction Convention cases from 2011 to date.
  • Table of Reported and Unreported Hague Convention Cases from 1988 until 2010
  • Who we are
  • Joel R. Brandes Curriculum vitae
  • Make an Appointment for a Consultation
  • Subscribe to Bits and Bytes™
  • Terms of Use Privacy Policy
  • Consultation Fee Payment
  • Untitled
  • New Page