The Law Firm of Joel R. Brandes, P.C.
  • Home
  • Recent Decisions & Articles
    • Recent Decisions, Legislation and Court Rules
    • New York Law Journal Articles by Joel R. Brandes
    • Articles Published in NYSBA Family Law Review and Journal
    • Bits and Bytes™ Issues - New York Divorce and Family Law Newsletter
    • Table of Contents of this website
    • Joel R. Brandes Letters to the Editor
    • Recent International Child Abduction Cases
    • Books by Joel R. Brandes
    • Adoption Information Articles
    • Child Abuse & Prevention Articles
    • Common Law Marriage Articles
    • Child Visitation Supervisors
    • Domestic Violence Articles
    • Engagement gifts Articles
    • Family Court Proceedings Articles
    • Grandparent and Non-Parent Visitation Articles
    • Professional Conduct Articles
    • Income Tax and Capital Gains Tax Articles
    • Spousal Support Articles
  • Divorce Information
    • Antenuptial, Prenuptial, Nuptial and Post Nuptial Agreements
    • Child Custody, Visitation (Parental Access) & Parental Alienation
    • Child Support
    • Counsel Fee Awards
    • Degrees & Licenses
    • Emergency Court Applications
    • Enforcement of Judgments & Orders
    • Equitable Distribution of Marital Property
    • Equitable Distribution Law for Trial Counsel
    • Equitable Distribution Decisions Chart to January 1, 2023
    • Exclusive Occupancy of Marital Home
    • Frequently Asked Questions About Marriage, Divorce, Separation and Custody
    • Grounds for Divorce
    • Legal Fees, Liens & Sanctions
    • Litigation & Procedure
    • Maintenance Awards until 2016
    • Maintenance Awards on or after January 22, 2016
    • Maintenance, Special Relief & Spousal Support
    • Maintenance and Child Support New York Court System Tools
    • Marital Property, Separate Property and Property Distribution
    • Motion Practice
    • Modification of Maintenance and Child Support Orders and Judgments
    • Orders of Protection
    • Qualified Domestic Relations Orders
    • Retirement Benefits
    • Right to Counsel in Matrimonial Action
    • Role of the Attorney for the Child
    • Special Relief (life, health, accident, medical and dental insurance)
    • Social Security Benefits for Divorced Spouses
    • Table of Effective dates of Revisions to Domestic Relations Law §§ 236, 237, and 240
    • Trial and Trial Testimony
    • Trial and Trial Testimony 2023 Update
    • Trial of a Divorce and Custody Action Website
    • Trial Evidence for Divorce and Family Law
    • Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction & Enforcement Act Overview
    • Valuation Aids
  • Appellate Practice
    • Important Practice Updates from the Appellate Divisions
    • Instructions for taking an Appeal to the Appellate Division
    • Taking an Appeal from Supreme Court under NYCSEF
    • Who is served with the notice of appeal?
    • Registration and Consent to Efiling by Respondents
    • Preserving the Right to Appeal
    • Appellate Division is Single Statewide Court
    • Appeals to the Appellate Division as of Right from the Supreme Court
    • Permissible Appellant—“Aggrieved party” and Mootness doctrine
    • Permissible Appellant - Appealable Judgment or Order
    • Permissible Appellant - Appeal from Order denying motion with leave to renew or without prejudice
    • Appeals : Appellate Review of Non-final Orders in Matrimonial Actions
    • Appeals : Fundamental and Harmless Error
    • Appeals : Matrimonial Presumptions and the Burden of Proof
    • Appeals : Stare Decisis, Precedent and Dicta
    • Appeals : Understanding the Support Magistrate Objection Process
    • Appeals to the Appellate Division from Family Court
    • Perfecting the Appeal to the Appellate Division - Methods
    • Perfecting the Appeal to the Appellate Division - Appellate Division Bound by Record
    • Perfecting the Appeal to the Appellate Division - Order and Settle the Transcript
    • Method of Settlement of the Transcript
    • Appeals to Appellate Division from Supreme Court by permission
    • Form of Record and Briefs - Parties, Docket Number, Method of Reproduction
    • ​Form of Briefs and Appendices - CPLR
    • What must be in the Reproduced Full Record
    • What is the Judgment-roll?
    • What must be in the Appendix.
    • What must be in Briefs
    • Time, number and manner of filing of records, appendices and briefs
    • Cross appeals - Briefing Schedule, Joint Record, Content of Briefs, Time for Service
    • Extension of time to perfect appeal
    • Concurrent appeals, Appeals from a single order or judgment. Consolidation of Appeals.
    • First Department Requirement of note of issue
    • Stay of Enforcement of Order or Judgment Pending Appeal
    • Practice in the Appellate Division: What Laws Govern
    • Practice Rules of the Appellate Divison: Joint & Local Rules
    • Practice in the Appellate Division First Department New and Amended Local Rules June 25, 2021
    • Practice in the Appellate Division, First Department, Frequently asked questions
    • Practice in the Appellate Divison: Motions in the First Department
    • Practice in the Appellate Divison: Motions in the Second Department
    • Practice in the Appellate Division: Motions in the Third Department
    • Practice In The Appellate Division:Motions in the Fourth Department
    • Instructions for Taking an Appeal Frequently Asked Questions
    • Instructions for Perfecting an Appeal to the Appellate Division
    • Instructions to Perfect an Appeal in the Third Department
    • Instructions to perfect an appeal in the Fourth Department
    • Appellate Division Fourth Department Q & A
    • Universal E-filing in the Fourth Department
    • Standards of Appellate Review in Matrimonial Actions
    • Standards of Appellate Review of Custody Determinations
    • Standards of Appellate Review of Custody Determinations - Changed Circumstances during pendency of appeal
    • Standards of Review : Fugative disentitlement doctrine in custody and child support appealsw Page
    • Mandatory Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Digital submission in Non-Efiled Matters
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department New and Amended Local Rules
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Formatting Specifications
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Frequently Asked Questions
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Second Department Technical Guidelines
    • Mandatory Electronic filing (e-filing): Second Department
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Motions Frequently Asked Questions
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Second Department - Motions -22 NYCRR 670.4 (d)
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Third Department - Digital Copies - 22 NYCRR 850.4 (a)
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Third Department Motion FAQs
    • Mandatory Electronic filing (e-filing): Fourth Department
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Fourth Department Motion FAQS
    • Electronic filing Authorization in matrimonial actions
    • E-filing Rules and Forms of the Appellate Division
    • Joel R. Brandes Reported Appeals
    • Court of Appeals Rules of Practice
    • How to take an Appeal to the Court of Appeals
    • Appeals as of Right to the Court of Appeals
    • Motions for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeals
    • Guidelines for Preparing a Motion for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeal
    • Rule 500.11 Review Alternate Procedure for Selected Appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Appealability and Reviewability in the Court of Appeals
    • What is a Final Determination appealable to Court of Appeals?
    • The "Necessarily Affects" Requirement of the Court of Appeals
    • Filing of record material and briefs in normal course appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Contents of Records, Appendices and Exhibits in Normal Course Appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Content and form of Briefs in Normal Course Appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Frequently Asked Questions for Civil and Criminal Appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Civil Motions in the Court of Appeals Frequently Asked Questions
    • Court-Pass - Court of Appeals Digital Filing Frequently Asked Questions
    • Court of Appeals Portal for uploading companion digital submissions
    • Court of Appeals Court Pass Public Access and Search
  • Trial of a Divorce and Custody Action
  • ​New York Court System Links for Lawyers
  • New York Court Rules
  • Electronic Filing in Supreme Court Rules and FAQ's
  • Removal of NYCSEF Consent 22 NYCRR 202.16-c
  • Sending Documents to the Court Using EDDS
  • Family Court Official Forms
  • New York Courts Case Search Page for E-filed Case Files
  • New York Court System Site Map
  • New York Court Websites and Decisions
  • International Child Abduction Laws and Information
  • Hague International Child Abduction Convention cases from 2011 to date.
  • Table of Reported and Unreported Hague Convention Cases from 1988 until 2010
  • Who we are
  • Joel R. Brandes Curriculum vitae
  • Make an Appointment for a Consultation
  • Subscribe to Bits and Bytes™
  • Terms of Use Privacy Policy
  • Consultation Fee Payment
  • Untitled
  • New Page

Fundamental and Harmless Error


                                          Appellate Review:Fundamental and Harmless Error
          In Newton v McFarlane,1 the Family Court stated only its conclusion - that the mother had established changed circumstances and that awarding custody to the mother was in the child's best interests - but no decision was ever issued. The Appellate Division, citing CPLR 4213[b] observed that “[i]nherent in the proposition that a reviewing court will give deference to the findings made by the hearing court is that the hearing court issued either a written or oral decision setting forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law... No deference can be given to a decision which does not exist or to findings which were not made.”
           A trial court decision in a matrimonial or family court matter must comply with CPLR 42 3 (b) which requires that the decision of the court must state the facts it deems essential. 2 The mechanics of complying with this mandate requires the trial court to (1) determine the facts; (2) determine the applicable law; (3) apply the law to its findings of
facts and (4) then exercise its discretion in reaching its conclusion. Based upon its findings of fact and conclusions of law a judgment or order is then entered. Court rules require that findings of fact and conclusions of law be in a separate paper from the judgment.3
           Many lawyers appeal from a trial court decision on the ground that the trial court made numerous evidentiary errors, and are confounded when the Appellate Division affirms the judgment. This occurs when the errors are harmless error. On the other hand, reversal is required when the error is a fundamental error. In this article we will discuss the distinction between fundamental error and harmless error in matrimonial and family court matters.
           When a trial court makes evidentiary errors or rulings which operate to deny an indi idual his fundamental right to a fair trial, an appellate court must reverse the judgment and grant a new trial, without regard to any evaluation as to whether the errors contributed to the result, and even in the absence of an objection. This is called a “fundamental error”.4
          The denial of the right to assistance of counsel is a fundamental error. In Moloney v. Moloney, 5
the court held that the deprivation of a party's fundamental right to counsel in a custody or visitation proceeding required reversal, without regard to the merits of the unrepresented party's position. In DiBella v DiBella, 6
the Appellate Divison held that the deprivation of a party’s statutory right to counsel requires reversal, without regard to the merits of the unrepresented party’s position. In the absence of the requisite statutory advisement of her right to counsel or a valid waiver of such right the mother was deprived of her fundamental right to counsel.
           It is a fundamental error for a party to be denied due process.7 In Pringle v Pringle8 reversal was required because the hearing conducted by the Hearing Examiner failed to comply with the rudiments of due process. The Appellate Division observed that a hearing to determine an application for modification of a support order is governed by the rules of evidence. Unsworn testimony is inadmissible and unverified financial data cannot serve as a
basis for a Family Court order for support. The colloquy among counsel and the Hearing Examiner was not a substitute for testimony.  The failure of a court to advise a respondent of his right to counsel before respondent
partially admitted the allegations in a PINS petition was been held to be reversible error as a denial of due process.9
          In Matter of King v King,10 a custody proceeding, the court held that although a movant seeking to vacate a default is generally required to demonstrate both that there was a reasonable excuse for his failure to appear and a meritorious defense no showing is required where a party’s fundamental due process rights have been denied. Notice is a fundamental component of due process. In the absence of notice to the wife, Family Court’s sua sponte consideration of extraneous allegations violated the wife’s due process rights.
          The denial of the right to testify and to present witnesses is the denial of a fundamental right. In Matter of Liska J v Benjamin K, 11 a custody proceeding, the father was deprived of procedural due process when Family Court excluded testimony as to his fitness as a parent. As a result, the father was prevented from addressing all of the relevant factors,
including who should be the primary custodian and what he did to foster a relationship between the child and the mother. The father’s stepfather was precluded from testifying as to his observations of the father as a parent. The Appellate Division held the court’s failure to allow the father a full and fair opportunity to present evidence, coupled with the court’s own limitations on its decision, constituted a fundamental due process error requiring reversal of
Family Court’s order.
          The denial of the right to cross-examine witnesses and the right to confer with counsel are fundamental errors requiring reversal. In Matter of Dominic B.,12 the courts failure to afford the mother the opportunity to cross-examine a key witness, a caseworker for petitioner, constituted a denial of her fundamental right to due process. In Matter of Turner v Valdespino,13 Family Court violated the mothers fundamental due process rights when it instructed her not to consult with her attorney during recesses, which resulted in her being unable to speak to her attorney over extended periods of time. Family Courts conduct deprived the mother of due process.
          The failure to advise a party of the right to counsel in a proceeding where he is entitled to the assignment of counsel is reversable error. In Matter of Tyler D,14 the Appellate Division held that the failure to apprise a respondent in a PINS proceeding of the right to remain silent constituted reversible error, even if the respondent consented to
the disposition in the presence of counsel or fails to seek to withdraw his or her admissions based on the failure.
The inability of a trial court to state any facts in support of its determination after the case was remitted by the Appellate Division to it for the purpose of formulating findings of fact constituted fundamental error.15
          At the other end of the spectrum there is harmless error. CPLR 2002 codifies the ‘harmless error” rule in New York. It provides that: “An error in a ruling of the court shall be disregarded if a substantial right of a party is not prejudiced.”
           Under CPLR 2002 the erroneous admission of improper evidence is harmless error, and not a basis for reversal if the outcome probably would have been the same even if the evidence had been excluded. Where the trial court erroneously excludes competent and relevant evidence, reversal is appropriate only if the excluded evidence probably would have been a "substantial influence" in producing a different result.16  For example, reversal was not required where improperly admitted evidence was of a “quibbling nature. "17 The reading of deposition transcript into evidence was harmless error where it’s contents were merely duplicative of evidence that had been independently admitted.18
           In Wilbur v Wilbur, 19 the parties’ stipulated to prevent the court from considering the fault of either party prior to the commencement of the divorce action. Trial Term, in that portion of its decision dealing with maintenance, pointed out that it was plaintiff’s “initiative to break up the marriage”. The Appellate Division held that in light of the parties’ stipulation, this was improper. However, the error was harmless since Trial Term’s decision demonstrated a careful analysis of all of the relevant statutory factors and since the amount awarded was fair and appropriate.
 It has been held that an error is harmless where the admissible evidence amply supports the court's determination, and it does not appear from the record that the court relied upon that inadmissible evidence in making its determination.20
           Error in admitting a document is harmless where it does not appear that the court relied on the document, and
the other evidence adduced at the hearing supports the court's determination.21 
           In Matter of Lane v Lane, 22 the Appellate Division held that Family Court erred in admitting the statements made to the court-appointed psychologist by the son's half-sister about abuse she and another half-sister had suffered at the hands of the mother. Although previous allegations of abuse or neglect made by a child are admissible in custody or
visitation proceedings if they are corroborated, the half-sister's statements to the forensic evaluator were largely uncorroborated. However, the error was harmless, as there was a sound and substantial basis in the record for the Family Court's determination, without consideration of the statements, that it was not in the son's best interests to have
unsupervised contact with his mother.
           Where a Law Guardian's report contained inadmissible hearsay, the error was harmless where there was no indication that the court relied upon the report in making its determination and the admissible evidence at the hearing supported the court's determination.23
           However, although individual errors might be deemed harmless when considered separately, a new trial will be ordered when these errors, considered collectively, cause substantial prejudice to a party,24 or are unduly prejudicial. 25
                                                                      Conclusion
 As we have seen, there is a substantial difference between fundamental error and harmless error. An attorney considering an appeal must consider this distinction when advising a client whether or not to take an appeal from an adverse order or judgment.

1 Newton v McFarlane, 2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 04386, 2019 WL 2363541, at *6 (2 Dept., 2019)
2 CPLR § 4213
3 22 NYCRR § 202.50
4  Rodriguez v Cato, 63 AD2d 922, 406 NYS2d 100 [1st Dept 1978]. 
5  Moloney v Moloney, 19 AD3d 496, 798 NYS2d 455 [2d Dept 2005]
6  DiBella v DiBella, 161 AD3d 1239, 75 NYS3d 371 [3d Dept 2018]
7 See Pringle v Pringle, 296 AD2d 828, 744 NYS2d 784 [4th Dept 2002]
8 Id
9 See Matter of Mark S., 144 AD2d 1010, 534 NYS2d 53 [4th Dept 1988]; Matter of Damian C., 161 AD2d 1206, 556 NYS2d 429 [4th Dept 1990]. 
10  King v King, 167 AD3d 1272, 91 NYS3d 283 [3d Dept 2018]
11  Liska J. v Benjamin K., 2019 WL 2835000 [3d Dept, 2019]
12  In re Dominic B., 138 AD3d 1395, 30 NYS3d 769 [4th Dept 2016]
13  Turner v Valdespino, 140 AD3d 974, 34 NYS3d 124 [2d Dept 2016]
14 Matter of Tyler D. (Anonymous), 166 AD3d 612, 87 NYS3d 338 [2d Dept 2018]
15 Rosenblatt-Roth v Rosenblatt-Roth, 78 AD2d 771, 433 NYS2d 652 [4th Dept 1980]
16  See, e.g., Khan v Galvin, 206 AD2d 776, 615 NYS2d 111 [3d Dept 1994]; Walker v
State, 111 AD2d 164, 488 NYS2d 793 [2d Dept 1985].
17 Fishman v Scheuer, 39 NY2d 502, 349 NE2d 815 [1976]
18 Green Is. Assoc. v Lawler, Matusky & Skelly Engineers, 170 AD2d 854, 566 NYS2d
715 [3d Dept 1991]
19 Wilbur v Wilbur, 116 AD2d 953, 498 NYS2d 525 [3d Dept 1986]
20  In re Michael G., 300 AD2d 1144, 752 NYS2d 772 [4th Dept 2002]
21  See In re Sherri M.K., 292 AD2d 868, 869, 739 NYS2d 325 [4th Dept 2002]; Matter of
Barone v Milks, 289 AD2d 931, 734 NYS2d 763 [4th Dept 2001]; Liza C. v Noel C., 207
AD2d 974, 616 NYS2d 819 [4th Dept 1994].
22  Lane v Lane, 68 AD3d 995, 892 NYS2d 130 [2d Dept 2009]
23  See, Matter of Barone v Milks, Supra.
24 Platovsky v City of New York, 275 AD2d 699, 700, 713 NYS2d 358, 360 [2d Dept
2000]
25 McGloin v Golbi, 49 AD3d 610, 611, 853 NYS2d 378, 379 [2d Dept 2008]
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Recent Decisions & Articles
    • Recent Decisions, Legislation and Court Rules
    • New York Law Journal Articles by Joel R. Brandes
    • Articles Published in NYSBA Family Law Review and Journal
    • Bits and Bytes™ Issues - New York Divorce and Family Law Newsletter
    • Table of Contents of this website
    • Joel R. Brandes Letters to the Editor
    • Recent International Child Abduction Cases
    • Books by Joel R. Brandes
    • Adoption Information Articles
    • Child Abuse & Prevention Articles
    • Common Law Marriage Articles
    • Child Visitation Supervisors
    • Domestic Violence Articles
    • Engagement gifts Articles
    • Family Court Proceedings Articles
    • Grandparent and Non-Parent Visitation Articles
    • Professional Conduct Articles
    • Income Tax and Capital Gains Tax Articles
    • Spousal Support Articles
  • Divorce Information
    • Antenuptial, Prenuptial, Nuptial and Post Nuptial Agreements
    • Child Custody, Visitation (Parental Access) & Parental Alienation
    • Child Support
    • Counsel Fee Awards
    • Degrees & Licenses
    • Emergency Court Applications
    • Enforcement of Judgments & Orders
    • Equitable Distribution of Marital Property
    • Equitable Distribution Law for Trial Counsel
    • Equitable Distribution Decisions Chart to January 1, 2023
    • Exclusive Occupancy of Marital Home
    • Frequently Asked Questions About Marriage, Divorce, Separation and Custody
    • Grounds for Divorce
    • Legal Fees, Liens & Sanctions
    • Litigation & Procedure
    • Maintenance Awards until 2016
    • Maintenance Awards on or after January 22, 2016
    • Maintenance, Special Relief & Spousal Support
    • Maintenance and Child Support New York Court System Tools
    • Marital Property, Separate Property and Property Distribution
    • Motion Practice
    • Modification of Maintenance and Child Support Orders and Judgments
    • Orders of Protection
    • Qualified Domestic Relations Orders
    • Retirement Benefits
    • Right to Counsel in Matrimonial Action
    • Role of the Attorney for the Child
    • Special Relief (life, health, accident, medical and dental insurance)
    • Social Security Benefits for Divorced Spouses
    • Table of Effective dates of Revisions to Domestic Relations Law §§ 236, 237, and 240
    • Trial and Trial Testimony
    • Trial and Trial Testimony 2023 Update
    • Trial of a Divorce and Custody Action Website
    • Trial Evidence for Divorce and Family Law
    • Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction & Enforcement Act Overview
    • Valuation Aids
  • Appellate Practice
    • Important Practice Updates from the Appellate Divisions
    • Instructions for taking an Appeal to the Appellate Division
    • Taking an Appeal from Supreme Court under NYCSEF
    • Who is served with the notice of appeal?
    • Registration and Consent to Efiling by Respondents
    • Preserving the Right to Appeal
    • Appellate Division is Single Statewide Court
    • Appeals to the Appellate Division as of Right from the Supreme Court
    • Permissible Appellant—“Aggrieved party” and Mootness doctrine
    • Permissible Appellant - Appealable Judgment or Order
    • Permissible Appellant - Appeal from Order denying motion with leave to renew or without prejudice
    • Appeals : Appellate Review of Non-final Orders in Matrimonial Actions
    • Appeals : Fundamental and Harmless Error
    • Appeals : Matrimonial Presumptions and the Burden of Proof
    • Appeals : Stare Decisis, Precedent and Dicta
    • Appeals : Understanding the Support Magistrate Objection Process
    • Appeals to the Appellate Division from Family Court
    • Perfecting the Appeal to the Appellate Division - Methods
    • Perfecting the Appeal to the Appellate Division - Appellate Division Bound by Record
    • Perfecting the Appeal to the Appellate Division - Order and Settle the Transcript
    • Method of Settlement of the Transcript
    • Appeals to Appellate Division from Supreme Court by permission
    • Form of Record and Briefs - Parties, Docket Number, Method of Reproduction
    • ​Form of Briefs and Appendices - CPLR
    • What must be in the Reproduced Full Record
    • What is the Judgment-roll?
    • What must be in the Appendix.
    • What must be in Briefs
    • Time, number and manner of filing of records, appendices and briefs
    • Cross appeals - Briefing Schedule, Joint Record, Content of Briefs, Time for Service
    • Extension of time to perfect appeal
    • Concurrent appeals, Appeals from a single order or judgment. Consolidation of Appeals.
    • First Department Requirement of note of issue
    • Stay of Enforcement of Order or Judgment Pending Appeal
    • Practice in the Appellate Division: What Laws Govern
    • Practice Rules of the Appellate Divison: Joint & Local Rules
    • Practice in the Appellate Division First Department New and Amended Local Rules June 25, 2021
    • Practice in the Appellate Division, First Department, Frequently asked questions
    • Practice in the Appellate Divison: Motions in the First Department
    • Practice in the Appellate Divison: Motions in the Second Department
    • Practice in the Appellate Division: Motions in the Third Department
    • Practice In The Appellate Division:Motions in the Fourth Department
    • Instructions for Taking an Appeal Frequently Asked Questions
    • Instructions for Perfecting an Appeal to the Appellate Division
    • Instructions to Perfect an Appeal in the Third Department
    • Instructions to perfect an appeal in the Fourth Department
    • Appellate Division Fourth Department Q & A
    • Universal E-filing in the Fourth Department
    • Standards of Appellate Review in Matrimonial Actions
    • Standards of Appellate Review of Custody Determinations
    • Standards of Appellate Review of Custody Determinations - Changed Circumstances during pendency of appeal
    • Standards of Review : Fugative disentitlement doctrine in custody and child support appealsw Page
    • Mandatory Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Digital submission in Non-Efiled Matters
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department New and Amended Local Rules
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Formatting Specifications
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Frequently Asked Questions
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Second Department Technical Guidelines
    • Mandatory Electronic filing (e-filing): Second Department
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Motions Frequently Asked Questions
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Second Department - Motions -22 NYCRR 670.4 (d)
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Third Department - Digital Copies - 22 NYCRR 850.4 (a)
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Third Department Motion FAQs
    • Mandatory Electronic filing (e-filing): Fourth Department
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Fourth Department Motion FAQS
    • Electronic filing Authorization in matrimonial actions
    • E-filing Rules and Forms of the Appellate Division
    • Joel R. Brandes Reported Appeals
    • Court of Appeals Rules of Practice
    • How to take an Appeal to the Court of Appeals
    • Appeals as of Right to the Court of Appeals
    • Motions for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeals
    • Guidelines for Preparing a Motion for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeal
    • Rule 500.11 Review Alternate Procedure for Selected Appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Appealability and Reviewability in the Court of Appeals
    • What is a Final Determination appealable to Court of Appeals?
    • The "Necessarily Affects" Requirement of the Court of Appeals
    • Filing of record material and briefs in normal course appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Contents of Records, Appendices and Exhibits in Normal Course Appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Content and form of Briefs in Normal Course Appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Frequently Asked Questions for Civil and Criminal Appeals to the Court of Appeals
    • Civil Motions in the Court of Appeals Frequently Asked Questions
    • Court-Pass - Court of Appeals Digital Filing Frequently Asked Questions
    • Court of Appeals Portal for uploading companion digital submissions
    • Court of Appeals Court Pass Public Access and Search
  • Trial of a Divorce and Custody Action
  • ​New York Court System Links for Lawyers
  • New York Court Rules
  • Electronic Filing in Supreme Court Rules and FAQ's
  • Removal of NYCSEF Consent 22 NYCRR 202.16-c
  • Sending Documents to the Court Using EDDS
  • Family Court Official Forms
  • New York Courts Case Search Page for E-filed Case Files
  • New York Court System Site Map
  • New York Court Websites and Decisions
  • International Child Abduction Laws and Information
  • Hague International Child Abduction Convention cases from 2011 to date.
  • Table of Reported and Unreported Hague Convention Cases from 1988 until 2010
  • Who we are
  • Joel R. Brandes Curriculum vitae
  • Make an Appointment for a Consultation
  • Subscribe to Bits and Bytes™
  • Terms of Use Privacy Policy
  • Consultation Fee Payment
  • Untitled
  • New Page