The Law Firm of Joel R. Brandes, P.C.
  • Home
  • Recent Decisions
  • Recent Legislation and Rules
  • Appeals to the Appellate Divison
    • Instructions for taking an Appeal to the Appellate Division
    • Who is served with the notice of appeal?
    • Registration and Consent to Efiling by Respondents Within 20 days of being served the notification of docket number
    • Preserving the Right to Appeal
    • Appellate Division is Single Statewide Court
    • Appeals to the Appellate Division as of Right from the Supreme Court
    • Permissible Appellant—“Aggrieved party” and Mootness doctrine
    • Permissible Appellant - Appealable Judgment or Order
    • Permissible Appellant - Appeal from Order denying motion with leave to renew or without prejudice
    • Appeals : Appellate Review of Non-final Orders in Matrimonial Actions
    • Appeals : Fundamental and Harmless Error
    • Appeals : Matrimonial Presumptions and the Burden of Proof
    • Appeals : Stare Decisis, Precedent and Dicta
    • Appeals : Understanding the Support Magistrate Objection Process
    • Appeals to the Appellate Division from Family Court
    • Perfecting the Appeal to the Appellate Division - Methods
    • Perfecting the Appeal to the Appellate Division - Appellate Division Bound by Record
    • Perfecting the Appeal to the Appellate Division - Order and Settle the Transcript
    • Method of Settlement of the Transcript
    • Appeals to Appellate Division from Supreme Court by permission
    • Form of Record and Briefs - Parties, Docket Number, Method of Reproduction
    • ​Form of Briefs and Appendices - CPLR
    • What must be in the Reproduced Full Record
    • What is the Judgment-roll?
    • What must be in the Appendix.
    • What must be in Briefs
    • Time, number and manner of filing of records, appendices and briefs
    • Cross appeals - Briefing Schedule, Joint Record, Content of Briefs, Time for Service
    • Extension of time to perfect appeal
    • Concurrent appeals, Appeals from a single order or judgment. Consolidation of Appeals.
    • First Department Requirement of note of issue
    • Stay of Enforcement of Order or Judgment Pending Appeal
    • Practice in the Appellate Division: What Laws Govern
    • Practice Rules of the Appellate Divison: Joint & Local Rules
    • Practice in the Appellate Division First Department New and Amended Local Rules June 25, 2021
    • Practice in the Appellate Division, First Department, Frequently asked questions
    • Practice in the Appellate Divison: Motions in the First Department
    • Practice in the Appellate Divison: Motions in the Second Department
    • Practice in the Appellate Division: Motions in the Third Department
    • Practice In The Appellate Division:Motions in the Fourth Department
    • Instructions for Taking an Appeal Frequently Asked Questions
    • Instructions for Perfecting an Appeal to the Appellate Division
    • Instructions to Perfect an Appeal in the Third Department
    • Instructions to perfect an appeal in the Fourth Department
    • Appellate Division Fourth Department Q & A
    • Universal E-filing in the Fourth Department
    • Standards of Appellate Review in Matrimonial Actions
    • Standard of Review— Appellate review of Custody Determinations
    • Standard of Review of Custody Determinations - Effect of Changed Circumstances During Pendency of Appeal
    • Standards of Review : Fugative disentitlement doctrine in custody and child support appealsw Page
    • Mandatory Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Digital submission in Non-Efiled Matters - June 1, 2020
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department New and Amended Local Rules Updated June 25, 2021
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Formatting Specifications
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Frequently Asked Questions
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Second Department Technical Guidelines
    • Mandatory Electronic filing (e-filing): Second Department
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Motions Frequently Asked Questions
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Second Department - Motions -22 NYCRR 670.4 (d)
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Third Department - Digital Copies - 22 NYCRR 850.4 (a)
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Third Department Motion FAQs
    • Mandatory Electronic filing (e-filing): Fourth Department
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Fourth Department Motion FAQS
    • Electronic filing Authorization in matrimonial actions
    • E-filing Rules and Forms of the Appellate Division
    • Joel R. Brandes Reported Appeals
  • Court of Appeals Rules of Practice
  • How to take an Appeal to the Court of Appeals
  • I. Appeals as of Right
  • II. Motions for Leave to Appeal
  • III. Guidelines for Preparing a Motion for Leave to AppeaNew Page
  • IV. Rule 500.11 Review Aternate Procedure for Selected Appeals
  • V. Appealability and Reviewability
  • VI. What is a Final Determination
  • VII. The "Necessarily Affects" Requirement
  • Filing of record material and briefs in normal course appeals and required copies
  • Contents of Records, appendices and exhibits in normal course appeals
  • Content and form of Briefs in normal course appeals
  • Civil and Criminal Appeals Frequently Asked Questions
  • Civil Motions Frequently Asked Questions
  • Court-Pass - Digital Filing Frequently Asked Questions
  • Court of Appeals Portal for uploading companion digital submissions
  • Court of Appeals Court Pass Public Access and Search
  • New York Divorce Law
    • Agreements Before & During Marriage
    • Custody & Visitation
    • Child Support Awards
    • Counsel Fee Awards
    • Enforcement of Judgments & Orders
    • Equitable Distribution
    • Equitable Distribution Law for Trial Counsel
    • Equitable Distribution Decisions Chart
    • Exclusive Occupancy of Marital Home
    • Grounds for Divorce
    • Maintenance Awards until 2016
    • Maintenance Awards after January 22, 2016
    • Modification of Maintenance and Child Support Orders and Judgments
    • Orders of Protection
    • Special Relief - Insurance
    • Spousal Support Awards
    • Table of Effective dates of Revisions to Domestic Relations Law §§ 236, 237, and 240
    • Timetable For Service of Motion Papers
    • Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction & Enforcement Act
  • Additional Articles and Information about New York Divorce & Family Law
    • Adoption Information
    • Antenuptial and Post Nuptial Agreements
    • Child Abuse & Prevention
    • Child Custody & Parental Alienation Information
    • Child Support
    • Common Law Marriage
    • Child Visitation Supervisors
    • Degrees & Licenses
    • Domestic Violence
    • Emergency Court Applications
    • Engagement gifts
    • Evidence Law
    • Family Court Proceedings
    • Federal Law Divorce Resources (Pension and Social Security)
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Grandparent and Non-Parent Visitation
    • Grounds for Divorce
    • Legal Fees, Liens & Sanctions
    • Litigation & Procedure
    • Maintenance and Child Support New York Court System Tools
    • Maintenance, Special Relief & Spousal Support
    • Marital Property and Property Distribution
    • New York Motion Practice
    • Professional Conduct
    • Retirement Benefits
    • Questions about Income Tax
    • Right to Counsel in Matrimonial Action
    • Role of the Attorney for the Child
    • Valuation Aids
  • ​New York Court System Links for Lawyers
  • New York Court Rules
  • New York Court Websites and Decisions
  • Electronic Filing in Supreme Court Rules and FAQ's
  • Using EDDS Electronic Delivery to Courts
  • New York Courts Case Search Page for E-filed Case Files
  • New York Court System Site Map
  • Family Court Official Forms
  • International Child Abduction Remedies
    • International Child Abduction
    • Hague International Child Abduction Convention cases from 2011 to date.
    • Hague international Child Abduction Table of Reported and Unreported Cases from 1988 until 2010
  • Site Map of The Law Firm of Joel R. Brandes PC website
  • Make an Appointment for a Consultation
    • Consultation Fee Payment
  • Joel R. Brandes Curriculum vitae
  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • About Us
  • Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Standard of Review - Appellate Review of Custody Determinations

​Standard of Review— Appellate review of Custody Determinations
 
          The general rule is that custody determinations are ordinarily a matter of discretion for the hearing court1 and its decision is entitled to great weight.2 In a matter which turns almost entirely on assessments of the credibility of the witnesses and particularly on the assessment of the character and temperament of the parent, the findings of the nisi prius Court are to be accorded the greatest respect.3
          The weighing of the various factors in a custody dispute requires an evaluation of the testimony, character and sincerity of all the parties involved. Generally, such an evaluation can best be made by the trial court which has direct access to the parties and can supplement that information with whatever professionally prepared reports are necessary. Appellate courts should be reluctant to substitute their own evaluation of these subjective factors for that of the nisi prius court, and if they do, should articulate the reasons for so doing.4
          It has been held that while the hearing court's determination, based as it is upon a firsthand assessment of the parties, their credibility, their character, and temperaments, should be accorded great deference on appeal,5 the authority of this Appellate Division is as broad as that of the hearing court.6
          The discretion of the hearing court is not absolute and may be set aside where it lacks “sound and substantial basis in the testimony” or is “opposed to everything presented to the Court.”7 Despite the deference to the findings of the hearing Judge, the hearing court's determination will be reversed where it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record.8
          The question of custody of children, is ordinarily a matter of discretion for the Trial Court and only rarely can be upset by the Court of Appeals on review.9
          The function of the Court of Appeals, when the Appellate Division reverses a custody award made by Supreme Court, is, to decide, taking into consideration the various factors on which custody awards depend, which determination of the courts below comports more nearly with the weight of the evidence. In that evaluation respect is to be accorded the Trial Judge's advantage, not available to appellate Judges, in being able to observe the demeanor of the witnesses.10
          Where the Trial Court has conducted a full evidentiary hearing, the findings are to be afforded great weight and are not lightly to be set aside.11
          Nevertheless, the overriding concern where custody is in issue must be the best interests of the child.12 An appellate court would be seriously remiss if, simply in deference to the findings of a trial judge, it allowed a custody determination to stand where it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record and, is contrary to the weight of the credible evidence.13
 
Endnotes

1 Gage v. Gage, 167 A.D.2d 332, 561 N.Y.S.2d 299 (2d Dep't 1990).

2 Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 173, 451 N.Y.S.2d 658, 436 N.E.2d 1260 (1982); Diane L. v. Richard L., 151 A.D.2d 760, 761, 542 N.Y.S.2d 783 (2d Dep't 1989).

3 Matter of Irene O., 38 N.Y.2d 776, 381 N.Y.S.2d 865, 345 N.E.2d 337 (1975); Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 451 N.Y.S.2d 658, 436 N.E.2d 1260 (1982); Doty v. Doty, 124 A.D.2d 323, 508 N.Y.S.2d 106 (3d Dep't 1986); Ira K. v. Frances K., 115 A.D.2d 699, 497 N.Y.S.2d 685 (2d Dep't 1985); Gloria S. v. Richard B., 80 A.D.2d 72, 437 N.Y.S.2d 411 (2d Dep't 1981).

4 Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 173–74, 451 N.Y.S.2d 658, 436 N.E.2d 1260 (1982).

5 Louise E.S. v. W. Stephen S., 64 N.Y.2d 946, 488 N.Y.S.2d 637, 477 N.E.2d 1091 (1985); Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 451 N.Y.S.2d 658, 436 N.E.2d 1260 (1982); Skolnick v. Skolnick, 142 A.D.2d 570, 530 N.Y.S.2d 235 (2d Dep't 1988).

6 Krebsbach v. Gallagher, 181 A.D.2d 363, 364, 587 N.Y.S.2d 346 (2d Dep't 1992); Matter of Louise E. S. v W. Stephen S., supra; Leistner v. Leistner, 137 A.D.2d 499, 524 N.Y.S.2d 243 (2d Dep't 1988).

7 In Krebsbach v. Gallagher, 181 A.D.2d 363, 587 N.Y.S.2d 346 (2d Dep't 1992), the Appellate Division reversed an order of the Family Court which granted the father's petition for sole custody of the parties' two sons as the determination was contrary to the best interests of the children and lacked a sound and substantial basis in the record. The parties were married in 1979. Pursuant to the parties' 1987 separation agreement, which was amended in 1988, and incorporated in the parties' 1988 divorce judgment, they shared joint custody and the children's primary residence was with the mother. The father had visitation every Tuesday afternoon until 8:30 p.m., two of every four week-ends, the month of August and one half of the major holidays and school vacations. The mother remarried in 1988. The father remarried in 1990. In 1989, the father petitioned the Court for sole custody. Forensic examinations were conducted and a hearing on custody was commenced in 1990. After several days of testimony, the parties stipulated to adjourn the hearing pending therapy sessions with a court-appointed psychiatrist. The hearing resumed in 1992. Thereafter, Family Court transferred custody to the father. The Appellate Division It is well settled, furthermore, that the courts will not disrupt sibling relationships unless there is an overwhelming need to do so. It further held that, contrary to the Family Court's determination, the mother was a loving and caring parent who, with her second husband, established a comfortable and stable family environment within which to raise the children. The evidence showed the children were doing well in school, enjoyed playing with their friends in the neighborhood in which they lived and were active in extracurricular activities and loved their stepbrothers. Both boys, during an in-camera interview, indicated a preference to stay with their mother. There was nothing in the record to indicate that the mother intentionally interfered with visitation or that her conduct rose to such level that she should be deprived of custody. There was no evidence that the mother and her second husband attempted to alienate the boys from their father. The Court-appointed psychologist testified that the mother's parenting skills improved during the course of therapy. In contrast, the father was manipulative and had a controlling personality and was not content unless he had his own way. Both the psychologist and the Law Guardian recommended against a change of custody. The Appellate Division held that Family Court's disregard for the recommendations of these two impartial observers were inexplicable in this case.

8 Krebsbach v. Gallagher, 181 A.D.2d 363, 364, 587 N.Y.S.2d 346 (2d Dep't 1992); Gloria S. v. Richard B., 80 A.D.2d 72, 76, 437 N.Y.S.2d 411 (2d Dep't 1981); see also, Skolnick v. Skolnick, 142 A.D.2d 570, 530 N.Y.S.2d 235 (2d Dep't 1988).

9 In re T. (State Report Title: In re Darlene T.), 28 N.Y.2d 391, 322 N.Y.S.2d 231, 271 N.E.2d 215 (1971); Bunim v. Bunim, 298 N.Y. 391, 83 N.E.2d 848 (1949).

10 Louise E.S. v. W. Stephen S., 64 N.Y.2d 946, 488 N.Y.S.2d 637, 477 N.E.2d 1091 (1985).

11 Ira K. v. Frances K., 115 A.D.2d 699, 497 N.Y.S.2d 685 (2d Dep't 1985).

12 See Domestic Relations Law, §§70, 240; Obey v. Degling, 37 N.Y.2d 768, 375 N.Y.S.2d 91, 337 N.E.2d 601 (1975); Bennett v. Jeffreys, 40 N.Y.2d 543, 387 N.Y.S.2d 821, 356 N.E.2d 277 (1976); Barry W. v. Barbara K., 55 A.D.2d 607, 389 N.Y.S.2d 624 (2d Dep't 1976).

13 Gloria S. v. Richard B., 80 A.D.2d 72, 437 N.Y.S.2d 411 (2d Dep't 1981); Skolnick v. Skolnick, 142 A.D.2d 570, 530 N.Y.S.2d 235 (2d Dep't 1988).

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Recent Decisions
  • Recent Legislation and Rules
  • Appeals to the Appellate Divison
    • Instructions for taking an Appeal to the Appellate Division
    • Who is served with the notice of appeal?
    • Registration and Consent to Efiling by Respondents Within 20 days of being served the notification of docket number
    • Preserving the Right to Appeal
    • Appellate Division is Single Statewide Court
    • Appeals to the Appellate Division as of Right from the Supreme Court
    • Permissible Appellant—“Aggrieved party” and Mootness doctrine
    • Permissible Appellant - Appealable Judgment or Order
    • Permissible Appellant - Appeal from Order denying motion with leave to renew or without prejudice
    • Appeals : Appellate Review of Non-final Orders in Matrimonial Actions
    • Appeals : Fundamental and Harmless Error
    • Appeals : Matrimonial Presumptions and the Burden of Proof
    • Appeals : Stare Decisis, Precedent and Dicta
    • Appeals : Understanding the Support Magistrate Objection Process
    • Appeals to the Appellate Division from Family Court
    • Perfecting the Appeal to the Appellate Division - Methods
    • Perfecting the Appeal to the Appellate Division - Appellate Division Bound by Record
    • Perfecting the Appeal to the Appellate Division - Order and Settle the Transcript
    • Method of Settlement of the Transcript
    • Appeals to Appellate Division from Supreme Court by permission
    • Form of Record and Briefs - Parties, Docket Number, Method of Reproduction
    • ​Form of Briefs and Appendices - CPLR
    • What must be in the Reproduced Full Record
    • What is the Judgment-roll?
    • What must be in the Appendix.
    • What must be in Briefs
    • Time, number and manner of filing of records, appendices and briefs
    • Cross appeals - Briefing Schedule, Joint Record, Content of Briefs, Time for Service
    • Extension of time to perfect appeal
    • Concurrent appeals, Appeals from a single order or judgment. Consolidation of Appeals.
    • First Department Requirement of note of issue
    • Stay of Enforcement of Order or Judgment Pending Appeal
    • Practice in the Appellate Division: What Laws Govern
    • Practice Rules of the Appellate Divison: Joint & Local Rules
    • Practice in the Appellate Division First Department New and Amended Local Rules June 25, 2021
    • Practice in the Appellate Division, First Department, Frequently asked questions
    • Practice in the Appellate Divison: Motions in the First Department
    • Practice in the Appellate Divison: Motions in the Second Department
    • Practice in the Appellate Division: Motions in the Third Department
    • Practice In The Appellate Division:Motions in the Fourth Department
    • Instructions for Taking an Appeal Frequently Asked Questions
    • Instructions for Perfecting an Appeal to the Appellate Division
    • Instructions to Perfect an Appeal in the Third Department
    • Instructions to perfect an appeal in the Fourth Department
    • Appellate Division Fourth Department Q & A
    • Universal E-filing in the Fourth Department
    • Standards of Appellate Review in Matrimonial Actions
    • Standard of Review— Appellate review of Custody Determinations
    • Standard of Review of Custody Determinations - Effect of Changed Circumstances During Pendency of Appeal
    • Standards of Review : Fugative disentitlement doctrine in custody and child support appealsw Page
    • Mandatory Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Digital submission in Non-Efiled Matters - June 1, 2020
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department New and Amended Local Rules Updated June 25, 2021
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Formatting Specifications
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Frequently Asked Questions
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Second Department Technical Guidelines
    • Mandatory Electronic filing (e-filing): Second Department
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): First Department Motions Frequently Asked Questions
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Second Department - Motions -22 NYCRR 670.4 (d)
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Third Department - Digital Copies - 22 NYCRR 850.4 (a)
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Third Department Motion FAQs
    • Mandatory Electronic filing (e-filing): Fourth Department
    • Electronic filing (e-filing): Fourth Department Motion FAQS
    • Electronic filing Authorization in matrimonial actions
    • E-filing Rules and Forms of the Appellate Division
    • Joel R. Brandes Reported Appeals
  • Court of Appeals Rules of Practice
  • How to take an Appeal to the Court of Appeals
  • I. Appeals as of Right
  • II. Motions for Leave to Appeal
  • III. Guidelines for Preparing a Motion for Leave to AppeaNew Page
  • IV. Rule 500.11 Review Aternate Procedure for Selected Appeals
  • V. Appealability and Reviewability
  • VI. What is a Final Determination
  • VII. The "Necessarily Affects" Requirement
  • Filing of record material and briefs in normal course appeals and required copies
  • Contents of Records, appendices and exhibits in normal course appeals
  • Content and form of Briefs in normal course appeals
  • Civil and Criminal Appeals Frequently Asked Questions
  • Civil Motions Frequently Asked Questions
  • Court-Pass - Digital Filing Frequently Asked Questions
  • Court of Appeals Portal for uploading companion digital submissions
  • Court of Appeals Court Pass Public Access and Search
  • New York Divorce Law
    • Agreements Before & During Marriage
    • Custody & Visitation
    • Child Support Awards
    • Counsel Fee Awards
    • Enforcement of Judgments & Orders
    • Equitable Distribution
    • Equitable Distribution Law for Trial Counsel
    • Equitable Distribution Decisions Chart
    • Exclusive Occupancy of Marital Home
    • Grounds for Divorce
    • Maintenance Awards until 2016
    • Maintenance Awards after January 22, 2016
    • Modification of Maintenance and Child Support Orders and Judgments
    • Orders of Protection
    • Special Relief - Insurance
    • Spousal Support Awards
    • Table of Effective dates of Revisions to Domestic Relations Law §§ 236, 237, and 240
    • Timetable For Service of Motion Papers
    • Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction & Enforcement Act
  • Additional Articles and Information about New York Divorce & Family Law
    • Adoption Information
    • Antenuptial and Post Nuptial Agreements
    • Child Abuse & Prevention
    • Child Custody & Parental Alienation Information
    • Child Support
    • Common Law Marriage
    • Child Visitation Supervisors
    • Degrees & Licenses
    • Domestic Violence
    • Emergency Court Applications
    • Engagement gifts
    • Evidence Law
    • Family Court Proceedings
    • Federal Law Divorce Resources (Pension and Social Security)
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Grandparent and Non-Parent Visitation
    • Grounds for Divorce
    • Legal Fees, Liens & Sanctions
    • Litigation & Procedure
    • Maintenance and Child Support New York Court System Tools
    • Maintenance, Special Relief & Spousal Support
    • Marital Property and Property Distribution
    • New York Motion Practice
    • Professional Conduct
    • Retirement Benefits
    • Questions about Income Tax
    • Right to Counsel in Matrimonial Action
    • Role of the Attorney for the Child
    • Valuation Aids
  • ​New York Court System Links for Lawyers
  • New York Court Rules
  • New York Court Websites and Decisions
  • Electronic Filing in Supreme Court Rules and FAQ's
  • Using EDDS Electronic Delivery to Courts
  • New York Courts Case Search Page for E-filed Case Files
  • New York Court System Site Map
  • Family Court Official Forms
  • International Child Abduction Remedies
    • International Child Abduction
    • Hague International Child Abduction Convention cases from 2011 to date.
    • Hague international Child Abduction Table of Reported and Unreported Cases from 1988 until 2010
  • Site Map of The Law Firm of Joel R. Brandes PC website
  • Make an Appointment for a Consultation
    • Consultation Fee Payment
  • Joel R. Brandes Curriculum vitae
  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • About Us
  • Terms of Use and Privacy Policy